The potential purchase of 36 F-35A fighter jets from Lockheed Martin is under scrutiny by Swiss politicians amid rising trade tensions. Calls to cancel or reconsider the deal, valued at up to 7.3 billion Swiss francs, have intensified following President Trump’s imposition of significant tariffs on Switzerland. This development reflects growing political pressure and economic concerns in response to the US trade actions. The fate of the jet order remains uncertain as discussions and debates continue within Switzerland’s political landscape.
Read More
Spain’s decision to forgo the F-35, choosing instead to either upgrade its existing Eurofighter fleet or invest in the Future Combat Air System (FCAS), marks a significant shift in its defense strategy. This choice is more than just a procurement decision; it’s a statement about Spain’s priorities and its view of the current geopolitical landscape.
Given Spain already operates the Eurofighter, it’s logical to anticipate further investment in this platform. Upgrading the Eurofighters to extend their operational lifespan is a pragmatic move, providing a reliable and familiar air defense capability while the FCAS project matures. It’s a way to maintain a relevant air force without the immediate financial and political commitments associated with acquiring a new, potentially contentious, aircraft.… Continue reading
India has declined a U.S. offer to purchase F-35 fighter jets, preferring joint design and domestic manufacturing instead of direct acquisitions. This rejection comes amid increasing trade tensions, particularly due to the U.S.’s proposed tariffs on Indian goods, prompting India to seek ways to reduce its trade surplus with Washington. Despite the rejection of the F-35, a strategic shift towards self-reliance in defense, diplomatic channels remain open, with India still planning to host a Quad leaders’ summit. The government’s focus remains on its “Make in India” initiative, prioritizing technology sharing and production within India for future military collaborations.
Read More
Iran says it has replaced air defences damaged in Israel war, and well, that’s a statement that’s certainly generating some… let’s say, *mixed* reactions. The internet, as always, is buzzing with opinions, skepticism being a major flavor. You can almost hear the collective eyeroll of many as they consider the implications. This is especially true given how the original systems performed, or rather, *didn’t* perform. Some are quick to point out the systems may have been about as useful as a screen door on a submarine.
The immediate question springing to mind is, “Replaced with what?” The implication of the initial claim is one thing, but the devil, as they say, is in the details.… Continue reading
The Netherlands will send F-35 fighter jets to Poland from September 1 to December 1 to safeguard military supply routes to Ukraine, joining Norwegian F-35s in patrolling NATO airspace over Eastern Europe. This deployment is part of NATO’s rapid response alert posture, responding to potential airspace violations, and follows a request from NATO’s Supreme Allied Command Europe. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans stated that these actions protect military equipment destined for Ukraine. Meanwhile, Poland is in the early stages of integrating its own F-35 fleet, with pilots recently completing training in the United States.
Read More
Israel Strikes Six Airports in Iran, Targets Fighter Jets and Missile Sites – Now, this is a developing situation, and from what I can gather, it’s escalating rapidly. Apparently, Israel has launched strikes targeting six airports within Iran. The focus seems to be on military objectives, specifically fighter jets and missile sites. It’s hard to ignore the recurring significance of the number six in this context; it certainly grabs your attention. This has really brought into sharp focus how important air superiority is. Iran was never really in a position to challenge Israel in terms of air power, but now, with these strikes, and if their own air defenses are compromised, it puts Iran at a considerable disadvantage.… Continue reading
In a secret collaboration, the US and Israel modified Israeli F-35I Adir warplanes to increase their range without compromising stealth capabilities or requiring mid-air refueling. This modification, confirmed by US officials, allowed Israel to conduct a surprise attack on Iran from its own bases. The alteration involved adding external fuel tanks, a complex undertaking given the F-35’s sensitive design, and represents a significant advancement for the aircraft. This development will likely be closely scrutinized by other potential F-35 buyers, as well as adversaries like China and Russia.
Read More
A UK High Court case examines the legality of continued UK arms sales to Israel, specifically concerning F-35 components. The government maintains that no evidence supports claims of genocide in Gaza or intentional targeting of civilians by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), asserting no domestic legal obligation exists to enforce international humanitarian law on other states. Government lawyers argue the F-35 carve-out from export restrictions was necessary to maintain international peace and security, while Al-Haq counters that this action violates UK domestic and international legal obligations. The case hinges on the interpretation of international law’s application within UK domestic law and whether government decisions on foreign policy are justiciable.
Read More
European allies are reconsidering their commitment to the Lockheed Martin F-35, prompting exploration of alternative sixth-generation fighter programs. Australia and Canada, facing trade tensions with the U.S. and considering alternatives to the F-35, have shown interest in joining the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP), a UK, Italy, and Japan collaborative effort. GCAP aims to field a next-generation fighter by the mid-2030s, featuring advanced technologies like AI co-pilots and potentially directed-energy weapons. Australia’s existing F-35As and both nations’ Commonwealth ties make their participation in GCAP feasible.
Read More
Retired Lt.-Gen. Yvan Blondin, a former advocate for the F-35, now argues against solely relying on the American-made jets due to the unpredictable nature of the U.S. government under past administrations. He cites the U.S.’s complete control over the F-35’s operation as a significant risk for Canada’s national security. Blondin proposes a diversified approach, incorporating a mix of F-35s and European-made aircraft like the Rafale or Gripen, to mitigate this risk and enhance Canada’s defense capabilities. This would allow for a more robust and independent air force. He emphasizes the need for Canada to develop a defense strategy that accounts for the evolving geopolitical landscape.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood