Following his election victory, Donald Trump has largely abandoned his campaign promises to address working-class economic concerns, such as grocery and gas prices. His focus has shifted to unrealistic and distracting foreign policy goals, including reclaiming the Panama Canal and purchasing Greenland, while simultaneously planning drastic cuts to federal programs that disproportionately benefit his base. These cuts, driven by his administration’s focus on tax cuts for the wealthy, will likely negatively impact the very people who voted for him. Ultimately, Trump’s post-election actions demonstrate a disregard for his previous commitments and a lack of understanding of the complexities of global economics and political systems.
Read More
Donald Trump’s presidential campaign employed a “bait and switch” tactic, promising to lower grocery prices and deport millions of undocumented immigrants—pledges subsequently abandoned or acknowledged as unfeasible. His inability to deliver on these promises is overshadowed by a new focus on territorial expansion, diverting attention from broken campaign pledges. This shift in focus aims to complete the deception of voters before he even assumes office, leaving them with four years to contemplate the consequences. The author alleges that Trump’s actions constitute a deliberate swindle of the American public.
Read More
Trump’s shift from the soaring rhetoric of his campaign promises is a significant development, deserving of closer scrutiny. The stark contrast between his pronouncements on the campaign trail and his more tempered, even contradictory statements post-election reveals a pattern that raises questions about his leadership style and the expectations of his supporters.
The initial promises were bold and often unrealistic. He pledged swift solutions to complex global issues, such as ending the war in Ukraine or resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict within 24 hours. These declarations, though wildly improbable, resonated with a segment of the population craving decisive action.
However, the post-election tone is markedly different.… Continue reading
Bringing down grocery prices, a key promise made during his campaign, is now acknowledged by Trump as a significantly challenging undertaking. He’s shifted from confident assertions of easily achievable price reductions to admitting the task will be “very hard.” This stark reversal highlights the complexities of economic policy and raises questions about the feasibility of his past pronouncements.
The difficulty, as he now explains, stems from the fact that prices have already risen, making any downward adjustment a much steeper climb than initially portrayed. It’s not simply a matter of flipping a switch; the economic forces at play are significantly more intricate.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s campaign centered on a promise to curb inflation, a pledge he acknowledged as crucial to his victory. However, he is now expressing uncertainty about the feasibility of that pledge. This shift, discussed by NYT columnist Michelle Goldberg and More Perfect Union’s Faiz Shakir, reveals a potential disconnect between Trump’s campaign promises and his true economic priorities. Analysis of his post-election statements suggests a reconsideration of his initial commitment to tackling inflation.
Read More
Donald Trump repeatedly promised to lower grocery prices, attributing this pledge to his election victory, despite the complexity of food pricing. He now claims lowering prices is difficult, contradicting his previous assertion of a simple solution. This reversal reveals the unsubstantiated nature of his promise, which ignored factors like supply chain issues and corporate profits. Ultimately, Trump’s pledge was a deceptive campaign tactic, leaving voters disillusioned and potentially accepting perpetually high food costs as the “new normal”.
Read More
Reducing food prices, a key campaign promise, is proving to be far more challenging than initially anticipated. The initial optimism surrounding the ease of lowering grocery costs now seems misplaced, replaced with a more realistic assessment of the difficulty involved.
This shift in tone is significant, especially considering the strong emphasis placed on affordable food during the campaign. The stark contrast between the earlier promises and the current acknowledgment of the inherent difficulty highlights a disconnect between campaign rhetoric and the realities of governing.
The reasons behind this difficulty are multifaceted and complex, going beyond simple pronouncements of ease or hardship.… Continue reading
In a recent interview, President-elect Trump acknowledged the difficulty of broadly reducing consumer prices, a claim contradicting his campaign promises of rapid price decreases. He previously pledged to slash prices on various goods and services, including gas and groceries, and to “end inflation.” These promises, however, lacked specific policy details, and economists have warned that some of his proposed measures, like tariffs, could actually increase prices. The significant inflation of 2022, largely driven by supply chain issues and strong consumer demand, further complicates efforts to rapidly lower prices.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood