The Stop Politicians Profiting from War Act, reintroduced by Congresswoman Tlaib, prohibits members of Congress, their spouses, and dependents from holding financial interests in companies contracting with the Department of Defense. This legislation addresses concerns about potential conflicts of interest, as over 50 members of Congress currently own stock in defense contractors. The bill aims to prevent the enrichment of lawmakers through war funding and the resulting massive profits of defense contractors, totaling over $85 billion in the last three years from taxpayer money. Numerous organizations support the bill, highlighting the ethical implications of this practice.
Read More
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez criticized Republicans for abandoning bipartisan-supported pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reforms due to Elon Musk’s online intervention. Musk’s tweets, despite his later admission of unfamiliarity with PBMs, caused the bill’s collapse, preventing potential savings on prescription drugs. This incident highlights the undue influence of billionaires on political decisions and the need for accountability to constituents rather than social media. Ocasio-Cortez urged Republicans to prioritize the needs of the American people and pass the reforms.
Read More
Senate Democrats are expressing serious concern over the potential for a dangerous precedent being set by what they perceive as a “power grab” by the former president. They are worried that the actions taken, if left unchecked, could significantly alter the balance of power within the government and weaken established norms.
This concern stems from a belief that the actions taken erode the system of checks and balances intended to prevent the concentration of power in a single branch of government. The fear is not just about the immediate consequences, but the long-term implications for future administrations.
The Democrats’ warning highlights a perceived lack of sufficient response to these actions.… Continue reading
Congresswoman Jayapal, along with over two dozen Democratic colleagues, introduced a constitutional amendment aiming to overturn the Citizens United Supreme Court decision. This “We the People Amendment” seeks to revoke corporate constitutional rights and curtail the influence of massive political spending, exemplified by Elon Musk’s significant contributions to the Trump campaign. The amendment would mandate transparency in political contributions and expenditures at all governmental levels. Supporters argue this is a necessary systemic solution to counter the escalating power of corporations and the corrupting influence of dark money in politics.
Read More
Representative Jayapal introduced the We the People Amendment, a constitutional amendment aiming to overturn Citizens United and end corporate personhood. The amendment seeks to curtail the undue influence of money in politics by explicitly stating that constitutional rights belong to human beings, not corporations. This would reverse the Citizens United ruling, which drastically increased corporate spending in elections, and mandate the public disclosure of all political contributions and expenditures. The amendment is supported by numerous co-sponsors and aims to restore democratic balance.
Read More
GOP senators are undeniably terrified of crossing Donald Trump, a fear significantly amplified by the looming threat of Elon Musk-funded primary challengers. This predicament highlights a profound shift in the dynamics of Republican politics, where loyalty to Trump trumps all other considerations, even the well-being of the nation.
The senators’ fear is not unfounded. Musk, possessing almost unimaginable wealth, can easily flood Republican primaries with millions of dollars, effectively silencing any dissent within the party. This financial muscle gives him an unprecedented ability to shape the political landscape, creating an environment where open defiance of Trump is virtually impossible.
The current situation is a direct consequence of past decisions.… Continue reading
The Greenlandic parliament, Inatsisartut, overwhelmingly approved a bill prohibiting anonymous and foreign political donations, aiming to safeguard Greenland’s political integrity. The bill passed with 22 votes in favor and no opposition, following a request from the government, Naalakkersuisut. This amendment comes shortly before the upcoming election, tentatively scheduled for March 11th, following a proposal by the Naalakkersuisut chairman.
Read More
In response to concerns about foreign interference in its upcoming election, Greenland’s government introduced a bill to ban foreign political donations. The bill, aiming to safeguard Greenland’s political integrity, prohibits parties from receiving contributions from foreign or anonymous donors and limits private donations. This action follows repeated assertions by Donald Trump of his desire to acquire Greenland, despite Greenland’s repeated declarations that it is not for sale. The bill is expected to pass quickly, potentially taking effect immediately.
Read More
President Trump’s second inauguration, coinciding with the 15th anniversary of the Citizens United ruling, highlights the profound influence of big money in politics. The presence of several tech billionaires at the inauguration underscores this, with their collective net worth exceeding $1 trillion. Analysis reveals that a mere ten megadonors contributed over 44% of the funds supporting Trump’s election, a level of concentration unprecedented in presidential campaigns. This extreme reliance on a small group of wealthy individuals is a direct consequence of Citizens United’s removal of restrictions on political spending.
Read More
Pam Bondi, former Florida Attorney General and a Trump appointee, reportedly profited handsomely from the Truth Social merger, amassing at least $3 million according to recently released financial filings. This revelation adds another layer to the already complex narrative surrounding her career and her close ties to Donald Trump.
The substantial financial gain raises immediate questions about potential conflicts of interest, particularly considering her previous role as Attorney General and her subsequent involvement in Trump’s inner circle. Her significant financial windfall from the merger, seemingly coinciding with her association with Trump, fuels concerns about undue influence and cronyism within the highest echelons of power.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood