Despite Elon Musk’s record-breaking $25 million investment in the Wisconsin Supreme Court election—the largest sum ever spent in a state supreme court race—his preferred candidate, Brad Schimel, lost to Democratic-backed Susan Crawford. This outcome maintains a 4-3 liberal majority on the court. The election, attracting national attention as a key swing-state contest, served as a referendum on the influence of Musk and Trump in down-ballot races. The Wisconsin Supreme Court will now face critical decisions on issues including abortion, redistricting, and union rights.
Read More
During a Wisconsin rally supporting Republican Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel, Elon Musk, while distributing $1 million in campaign funds, accused hecklers of being George Soros-paid operatives. This sparked widespread online criticism, highlighting the irony of Musk’s accusation given his own substantial financial involvement in the election. Commentators pointed out the hypocrisy of Musk’s claim, framing his actions as a blatant form of vote-buying. The election’s outcome is crucial, as it will significantly impact the ideological balance of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, and Musk’s involvement has transformed the race into a referendum on him and President Trump.
Read More
Wisconsin’s Attorney General has initiated legal action against Elon Musk concerning his controversial offer of cash incentives tied to voting outcomes in the state. This bold move comes in response to Musk’s actions, which many perceive as a blatant attempt to influence the election through financial means. The implications of this legal challenge are far-reaching, potentially setting a significant precedent for future cases involving wealthy individuals and their influence on electoral processes.
The legal action underscores the gravity of the situation and the determination of Wisconsin authorities to uphold the integrity of the election. It’s a direct challenge to Musk’s assertion that he can operate outside the bounds of established laws simply because of his immense wealth.… Continue reading
Arizona Republicans Reps. Andy Biggs and Warren Petersen, along with Sheriff Jerry Sheridan, held a town hall exclusively for Republicans, sparking criticism from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Ocasio-Cortez condemned the event as exclusionary, arguing elected officials should serve all constituents. The event’s organizers refused to clarify why a private event was labeled a “town hall,” and attendees were reportedly vetted based on party affiliation. This incident follows a pattern of Republicans avoiding public town halls, a move Democrats are using politically.
Read More
Democratic politicians misunderstand the economic anxieties of working-class and even upper-middle-class Americans, focusing too much on donors instead of voters. The party needs to prioritize policies that directly improve workers’ lives, such as expanding overtime pay, and communicate these policies effectively, avoiding language that sounds condescending or like charity. This requires actively engaging with working-class communities and listening to their concerns, even if those concerns challenge current party narratives. Ultimately, a generational effort is needed to rebuild the party’s relationship with working-class Americans, centering the dignity of work in all its actions.
Read More
The Stop Politicians Profiting from War Act, reintroduced by Congresswoman Tlaib, prohibits members of Congress, their spouses, and dependents from holding financial interests in companies contracting with the Department of Defense. This legislation addresses concerns about potential conflicts of interest, as over 50 members of Congress currently own stock in defense contractors. The bill aims to prevent the enrichment of lawmakers through war funding and the resulting massive profits of defense contractors, totaling over $85 billion in the last three years from taxpayer money. Numerous organizations support the bill, highlighting the ethical implications of this practice.
Read More
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez criticized Republicans for abandoning bipartisan-supported pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reforms due to Elon Musk’s online intervention. Musk’s tweets, despite his later admission of unfamiliarity with PBMs, caused the bill’s collapse, preventing potential savings on prescription drugs. This incident highlights the undue influence of billionaires on political decisions and the need for accountability to constituents rather than social media. Ocasio-Cortez urged Republicans to prioritize the needs of the American people and pass the reforms.
Read More
Senate Democrats are expressing serious concern over the potential for a dangerous precedent being set by what they perceive as a “power grab” by the former president. They are worried that the actions taken, if left unchecked, could significantly alter the balance of power within the government and weaken established norms.
This concern stems from a belief that the actions taken erode the system of checks and balances intended to prevent the concentration of power in a single branch of government. The fear is not just about the immediate consequences, but the long-term implications for future administrations.
The Democrats’ warning highlights a perceived lack of sufficient response to these actions.… Continue reading
Congresswoman Jayapal, along with over two dozen Democratic colleagues, introduced a constitutional amendment aiming to overturn the Citizens United Supreme Court decision. This “We the People Amendment” seeks to revoke corporate constitutional rights and curtail the influence of massive political spending, exemplified by Elon Musk’s significant contributions to the Trump campaign. The amendment would mandate transparency in political contributions and expenditures at all governmental levels. Supporters argue this is a necessary systemic solution to counter the escalating power of corporations and the corrupting influence of dark money in politics.
Read More
Representative Jayapal introduced the We the People Amendment, a constitutional amendment aiming to overturn Citizens United and end corporate personhood. The amendment seeks to curtail the undue influence of money in politics by explicitly stating that constitutional rights belong to human beings, not corporations. This would reverse the Citizens United ruling, which drastically increased corporate spending in elections, and mandate the public disclosure of all political contributions and expenditures. The amendment is supported by numerous co-sponsors and aims to restore democratic balance.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood