The President of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian, stated that moving the capital is no longer a choice but an obligation due to the severe ecological strain on Tehran, citing sinking land and shrinking water supplies as evidence of a looming catastrophe. The government is considering moving the capital to the Makran coast, a remote area, to alleviate overcrowding and resource stress. This plan, which has been proposed before, faces challenges including high costs and political resistance, while critics also question the area’s readiness and security.
Read More
Facing a severe drought, Iran has initiated cloud seeding operations to stimulate rainfall across the country. The effort, starting over the Urmia lake basin, involves spraying clouds with chemicals to induce precipitation. With record-low rainfall and dwindling water reserves, including Tehran’s Amirkabir dam at just 8% capacity, authorities are taking action to address the crisis. Additional cloud seeding operations are planned in East and West Azerbaijan to mitigate the impact of the drought and prevent potential water rationing and evacuations.
Read More
Iran’s president has stated the country has an obligation to relocate its capital from Tehran to the south due to the city’s overpopulation, dwindling water supplies, and the threat of land subsidence. He highlighted the growing water crisis as a primary driver for this shift, noting significant reductions in rainfall and the high costs associated with water transport to Tehran. The proposed move aims to leverage the Persian Gulf region’s potential for trade and economic growth while addressing the unsustainable resource consumption plaguing the capital. He emphasized that current trends of development without resource management will lead to destruction.
Read More
In the Russian-occupied cities of Donetsk and Mariupol, residents are facing a severe water crisis, with water supplies severely limited and often undrinkable. The destruction of infrastructure and failed reconstruction projects have led to a humanitarian emergency, exacerbated by high summer temperatures. Despite the construction of a new pipeline, the water shortage persists, and local reservoirs are rapidly dwindling. The situation has prompted concerns about public health, as well as leading to infrastructural collapse, institutional corruption, and humanitarian failure.
Read More
Trump’s 2.2 billion-gallon dump from California reservoirs was a disastrous decision, and the more we learn, the worse it seems. Initial reports suggested a reckless disregard for water conservation, a potential photo opportunity overshadowing the urgent need for water resources. Now, it’s becoming increasingly clear that this wasn’t just incompetence, but a deliberate act with potentially devastating long-term consequences.
The emerging picture paints a troubling scene. Internal memos reportedly revealed that Army Corps officials knew the dam releases wouldn’t alleviate the California wildfires, yet they proceeded with the order anyway. This raises serious questions about accountability and the prioritization of political maneuvering over sound water management.… Continue reading
The release of California’s water by President Trump, while seemingly fulfilling a promise to help farmers, ironically targeted the very people he intended to assist. The water released came from reservoirs crucial to these farmers’ livelihoods, leaving them with significantly less water for their crops.
This action highlights a troubling lack of foresight and planning, a pattern seemingly characteristic of the administration’s approach. The rushed release, with minimal consultation and consideration for the long-term consequences, paints a picture of impulsive decision-making rather than thoughtful policy. One might even argue it points to a disregard for the intricate details of water management and its impact on agricultural communities.… Continue reading
The US Army Corps of Engineers released approximately 2.2 billion gallons of water from two Central California reservoirs at President Trump’s order, purportedly to aid fire-ravaged Southern California. This action, however, is criticized for its lack of coordination with state and local water managers and its wasteful timing during a wet winter, jeopardizing agricultural water supplies later in the year. The released water did not reach Los Angeles, as it flowed into the Tulare Lake bed, offering limited irrigation benefits and potentially causing future water shortages for Central Valley farmers. Experts and state officials express deep concern over this poorly planned release.
Read More
Trump claims he unleashed a torrent of water upon California, solving its water woes. Local officials, however, paint a drastically different picture, arguing that his actions brought the state perilously close to devastating floods.
The core of the disagreement hinges on the timing and manner of water releases from reservoirs. Trump’s pronouncements celebrate the release of billions of gallons of water as a triumph, a victory in his ongoing battle against what he perceives as California’s mismanagement of its water resources. This celebratory tone starkly contrasts with the apprehension and alarm felt by local officials.
Their perspective emphasizes the abruptness and scale of the water release.… Continue reading
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers significantly increased water releases from Terminus and Schafer Dams in Tulare County, California, a move spurred by an executive order seemingly linked to President Trump’s pronouncements. These releases, totaling billions of gallons, were made without typical coordination with state and local officials, causing concern among water managers and farmers who rely on these reservoirs for irrigation. The timing, during winter with low demand and minimal snowpack, and lack of a clear water transportation plan, have drawn sharp criticism and questions regarding the decision-making process and potential negative impacts on agriculture and communities. State officials have emphasized the lack of consultation and the current absence of a need for the released water.
Read More
California officials have vehemently refuted former President Trump’s claim that he personally dispatched the National Guard and restored water supplies during a state emergency. Trump’s assertion is unsupported by evidence, contradicting official statements and records. The state maintains its own emergency response protocols and credits its own agencies and personnel for the successful crisis management. This public denial underscores a continued partisan disagreement regarding the handling of the emergency.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood