President Trump’s tariffs, despite administration claims to the contrary, are increasing consumer prices on various goods, as admitted by Walmart CEO Doug McMillon. This admission prompted Trump’s public criticism and pressure on Walmart to reverse course. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that Walmart will absorb some tariff costs, but some will be passed to consumers. Republican dissent is growing, with figures like Mike Pence and Rand Paul highlighting the tariffs as a significant tax increase imposed without Congressional approval.
Read More
Mike Pence publicly criticized Donald Trump’s recent tariff policies, calling them the largest peacetime tax increase in U.S. history and a “massive policy misstep.” Pence, contrasting the current approach with their first term’s use of tariffs as negotiation leverage, highlighted the resulting market downturn and potential harm to American jobs and consumers. He argues that these tariffs, unlike Trump’s claims, ultimately burden American businesses and consumers through higher prices. This marks a significant public split between the former running mates on economic policy, with Pence advocating for free trade agreements that isolate China.
Read More
Ruhle’s commentary highlights President Trump’s inconsistent stance on tariffs, exposing a potential supply chain crisis looming within three weeks if the situation isn’t reversed. Trump’s wavering, from initially refusing to lower tariffs to suggesting significant reductions, is interpreted as a search for a convenient exit strategy from his strong trade policies. This inconsistency, coupled with dwindling cargo shipments, points toward a severe economic disruption mirroring the COVID-19 supply chain crisis.
Read More
Following praise for Ursula von der Leyen, President Trump’s rhetoric sharply shifted, reflecting strained US-EU trade relations. Von der Leyen’s condition for a meeting—a concrete trade package—remains unmet, despite the EU offering concessions and threatening retaliatory tariffs. This shift coincides with a temporary US-China tariff reduction, achieved after talks in Switzerland. Trump’s previously imposed “Liberation Day” tariffs globally, including on the EU, continue to pose a significant threat to international trade.
Read More
In response to Mattel’s price increase due to President Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods, Trump threatened to impose a 100% tariff on Mattel toys, effectively barring them from their largest market. Mattel CEO Ynon Kreiz stated that the company does not plan to manufacture in the U.S., aiming for efficient, cost-effective production elsewhere while maintaining American design and creativity. Despite acknowledging the increased cost of toys resulting from his tariffs, Trump rationalized this as a trade-off, and Vice President Vance further defended the tariffs, linking them to increased domestic weapons production and national security. Mattel plans to reduce its reliance on Chinese imports to 15 percent by 2026.
Read More
Ruhle’s commentary highlights President Trump’s inconsistent stance on tariffs, revealing a potential “theater” surrounding a trade deal with the U.K. and significant softening on China tariffs despite initial strong rhetoric. This wavering, coupled with declining cargo ship arrivals at major ports, could precipitate a COVID-like supply chain crisis within three weeks. Trump’s actions suggest a desire to find a way out of the current trade predicament.
Read More
Ruhle’s commentary highlights President Trump’s inconsistent stance on tariffs, exposing a potential supply chain crisis looming within three weeks due to decreasing cargo shipments. Trump’s wavering on tariffs, initially presented with strong rhetoric, now suggests a desire for a negotiated exit from the trade dispute. This inconsistency, exemplified by a hastily announced, unfinished UK trade deal and fluctuating tariff positions on China, threatens to mirror the economic disruptions experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Read More
The Truth in Tariffs Act, introduced by Rep. Jamie Raskin, mandates that retailers disclose tariff-related price increases to consumers, aiming to expose the impact of President Trump’s policies. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer supports the bill, arguing the tariffs harm American consumers. The White House countered by criticizing Democrats’ failure to address inflation and labeled Amazon’s prior consideration of similar transparency measures as a “hostile and political act.” This legislation follows Amazon’s abandoned plan to display tariff costs, highlighting the ongoing political debate surrounding the economic consequences of tariffs.
Read More
President Trump’s tariffs are forcing businesses to raise prices, prompting many to increase transparency with consumers. Retailers, from small bike shops to large online marketplaces like Temu and Shein, are openly displaying tariff-related surcharges to maintain customer trust amidst rising costs. This strategy, while potentially alienating some customers, aims to mitigate negative impacts by clearly attributing price increases to government policy. A recent survey reveals significant public awareness of tariff-driven price hikes and widespread support for businesses disclosing these costs.
Read More
Democrats are proposing a bill that would mandate retailers to clearly display the portion of a product’s price attributable to Trump-era tariffs. This initiative aims to provide consumers with greater transparency regarding the impact of these tariffs on their purchasing power. The idea is to make it undeniably clear how much more consumers are paying due to these specific trade policies.
The proposed legislation seeks to shift the burden of demonstrating the tariff’s effect directly onto retailers, forcing them to actively showcase this information on product labels or in other prominent locations. This, in theory, would make it far harder for retailers to simply absorb the added tariff cost and quietly raise their overall prices without being held accountable for the increase.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood