Following a call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, President Trump announced a tariff deadline extension. The 50% tariff on EU goods, originally set for June 1st, has been postponed until July 9, 2025. Both leaders expressed optimism regarding the ongoing trade negotiations. Von der Leyen stated the EU is prepared to expedite discussions to reach a mutually beneficial agreement. This extension provides additional time to resolve trade disputes between the US and the EU.
Read More
Following Donald Trump’s threat of a 50% tariff on the European Union, the EU reaffirmed its commitment to ongoing trade negotiations. The EU emphasized a commitment to securing a mutually beneficial agreement, prioritizing respect and good faith over threats. This firm yet cooperative stance counters Trump’s claim that talks are “going nowhere.” The EU’s commitment underscores its dedication to resolving trade issues constructively, despite the former president’s aggressive stance.
Read More
Despite President Trump’s threat of a 50% tariff on all EU goods entering the US, the EU remains committed to securing a mutually beneficial trade agreement based on respect, not coercion. The EU’s trade commissioner emphasized the bloc’s engagement and readiness to defend its interests. However, Trump’s impatience with negotiations and his stated intention to implement tariffs on June 1st, despite potential delays contingent on significant European investment, has raised concerns across Europe. European leaders have warned of the damaging consequences of escalating tariffs, advocating for continued negotiations as the best path forward.
Read More
Following June’s announcement of a potential 50% tariff on European goods, President Trump declared he is not currently pursuing a trade agreement with the European Union. However, he indicated a willingness to alter or postpone these tariffs contingent upon European firms committing to establish manufacturing facilities within the United States. This suggests a potential pathway to avoiding the tariffs, albeit one dependent on specific actions from European businesses. The President’s statement leaves the future of US-EU trade relations uncertain.
Read More
President Trump announced a 50% tariff on all EU imports to the US, effective June 1, 2025, citing stalled trade talks and accusing the EU of unfair trade practices. This announcement caused significant stock market declines across Europe and the US. The EU had recently submitted a new trade proposal including tariff cuts and cooperation initiatives, but this was apparently insufficient to prevent the tariff imposition. The move represents a major escalation of trade tensions between the US and the EU, with the potential for considerable economic repercussions.
Read More
President Trump announced a proposed 50% tariff on all European Union imports, effective June 1, 2025, citing stalled trade negotiations and unacceptable trade deficits exceeding $250 billion annually. This decision follows Trump’s recent threats against Apple and reverses a trend of recent trade deal announcements that had calmed investor concerns. Treasury Secretary Bessent hopes the tariff announcement will pressure the EU into more favorable negotiations. The announcement caused immediate negative reactions in both U.S. and European stock markets.
Read More
Analysis of financial disclosures reveals numerous instances of well-timed stock trades by high-ranking executive branch officials and congressional aides coinciding with significant government announcements, particularly those related to President Trump’s tariffs. While no evidence suggests insider trading, these transactions raise ethical concerns, as they erode public trust in both government and market integrity. Ethics experts advocate for stricter regulations governing the financial activities of federal employees to mitigate potential conflicts of interest and the appearance of impropriety. The lack of transparency surrounding these trades further underscores the need for increased oversight.
Read More
Despite President Trump’s repeated claims that tariffs are paid entirely by other countries, Treasury Secretary Bessent acknowledged that some tariff costs may be passed onto consumers, as evidenced by Walmart’s planned price increases. This contradicts Trump’s assertion that companies like Walmart should “eat the tariffs,” a stance also refuted by the fact that other businesses, including Adidas and Stanley Black & Decker, anticipate similar price hikes due to tariffs. Economists largely concur that tariffs function as import taxes borne by businesses and consumers, fueling concerns about a potential recession. The administration attempted to downplay these concerns, claiming that CEOs are legally obligated to provide worst-case scenarios to investors.
Read More
Robert Reich argues that President Trump’s tariffs threaten America’s global economic dominance by undermining the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency. This shift, evidenced by investors withdrawing from U.S. Treasury bills, could lead to significant wealth loss and diminished American influence. The tariffs disproportionately harm lower-income Americans, acting as a regressive tax that increases the cost of goods. Reich questions the administration’s rationale for policies that accelerate the erosion of this crucial American economic advantage.
Read More
President Trump’s proposed “External Revenue Service” would replace income taxes with tariffs, theoretically funding the government through levies on imported goods. This plan aims to eliminate income taxes for those earning under $200,000 annually. The idea draws historical parallels to the pre-income-tax era when tariffs were a primary government revenue source. Trump projects this shift as a significant financial boon for American citizens.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker