Following a Supreme Court ruling that deemed his global tariffs unlawfully imposed, President Trump vowed to raise worldwide tariffs to 15 percent. He announced this intention via Truth Social, stating the increase would be effective immediately and bypass congressional approval. This move, framed as retribution for perceived unfair trade practices, utilizes the 1974 Trade Act, which carries limitations on duration and scope. Critics, including Democratic lawmakers, denounced the tariffs as a tax on the American people.
Read More
In response to the Supreme Court’s decision invalidating his prior import duties, President Trump has signed a new executive order imposing a 10% “global tariff.” This new measure, effective immediately and lasting 150 days, utilizes Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, replacing tariffs previously enacted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). While some countries may see reduced tariff rates compared to prior agreements, the administration indicated that higher rates could be reinstated for specific nations as alternative legal pathways are explored. The President expressed strong disapproval of the Supreme Court’s ruling, stating he would continue to pursue tariffs without congressional involvement.
Read More
Despite Donald Trump’s consistent rejection of economic analyses, evidence accumulated over the course of his second term has definitively shown that American consumers are bearing the brunt of his trade tariffs. Nearly a year after the tariffs were implemented, multiple studies, including one by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Columbia University, found that approximately 90% of the economic burden fell on domestic firms and consumers, rather than foreign entities. This overwhelming consensus among economists and researchers has been met with dismissal from the White House, with a top advisor even suggesting disciplinary action for the authors of a critical Federal Reserve study.
Read More
World leaders are reportedly developing an economic plan to counter the global disruptions caused by Donald Trump’s tariff policies. Spearheaded by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, this initiative has garnered interest from nearly 40 countries, including the European Union and members of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. The aim is to bolster trade among participating nations, enhance supply chain resilience, and potentially limit the economic influence of the Trump administration’s actions.
Read More
A recent Federal Reserve Bank of New York report indicates that American consumers and companies bore the vast majority of the cost of President Donald Trump’s tariffs through late 2025. Contrary to the President’s assertions that foreign countries paid the tariffs, the study found that U.S. entities absorbed nearly 90% of the financial burden. This translated to a significant tax increase for American households, with the tariffs acting as a de facto tax on domestic businesses and individuals rather than foreign entities.
Read More
Mounting data from sources including the Federal Reserve Bank of New York indicates that American households and businesses are bearing the vast majority of the cost of President Trump’s tariffs, despite presidential claims to the contrary. The analysis shows that Americans paid for nearly 90% of the tariffs in 2025, a trend consistent with earlier periods of tariff imposition. This burden is reflected in companies either absorbing increased costs, impacting their profit margins, or passing them on to consumers through higher prices, leading to decreased consumer confidence. Economists argue that the economic strain from these tariffs outweighs the claimed benefits, such as funding national debt reduction or providing tax rebates, with the cost to households potentially exceeding any tax relief.
Read More
Speaker Mike Johnson’s attempt to maintain a ban on challenging President Trump’s tariffs was unsuccessful when three Republicans joined Democrats in voting against a procedural measure. This vote’s failure allows Democrats to force votes on repealing these tariffs, a setback for the administration. Representatives Massie, Bacon, and Kiley cited the need for Congress to reclaim its constitutional authority over tariffs, arguing they have been a net negative for the economy and a significant tax on American consumers and businesses. Speaker Johnson acknowledged the difficulties of leading with a slim majority, stating that while most House Republicans support the president’s trade policies, unanimity is required for such measures.
Read More
Despite a week of negotiations in Washington, the Korean government failed to prevent potential tariffs threatened by President Trump. While officials claim to have cleared up “unnecessary misunderstandings,” the U.S. is already preparing to publish tariff measures. The key point of contention is the passage of a special law on investing in the United States, which the Korean government hopes to expedite. Concerns remain regarding President Trump’s unpredictable policy shifts and the differing investment priorities between the two countries, potentially leading to further friction.
Read More
Recent data reveals the detrimental impact of President Trump’s tariff policies on American alcohol manufacturers, particularly in Canada. Provincial liquor store boycotts in Quebec and Ontario have led to a staggering 91% decline in U.S. wine sales to Canada since 2024, causing major losses for companies like Brown-Forman and prompting production suspensions at plants like Jim Beam’s. This situation has forced smaller distillers to drastically reduce sales and shift production to Canada, alongside a rise in prices and scarcity of imported goods in American bars. Despite these consequences, the President has shown no inclination to alter his course, even threatening further tariffs on foreign products in response to political disagreements.
Read More
President Trump has announced the US will increase tariffs on South Korean imports to 25%, citing South Korea’s slow approval of a trade deal reached last year. The South Korean government has stated it was not officially notified of the decision and is seeking urgent talks with the US to address the issue. The initial trade agreement included a $350 billion investment from South Korea into the US. Trump has previously used tariffs as a foreign policy tool, most recently threatening Canada and the UK with tariffs in unrelated trade disputes.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker