Illinois has filed a lawsuit to prevent the Trump administration from deploying federalized National Guard troops in Chicago, citing concerns of federal overreach and infringement on the state’s sovereignty. The lawsuit argues that the deployment is unconstitutional and will cause irreparable harm to the state’s social fabric, community relations, and economy. This legal action mirrors arguments made in an Oregon federal court’s temporary block of the Trump administration’s actions in Portland. The state seeks a court order declaring the deployment unlawful.
Read More
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration from deploying any National Guard units to Oregon. This decision came after the president attempted to circumvent a prior ruling against deploying Oregon’s National Guard by mobilizing troops from California and potentially Texas. The judge, appointed by Trump, questioned the federal government’s actions as a circumvention of her initial order. Both Oregon and California officials have expressed their disapproval of the president’s actions, with the Governor vowing to resist further attempts to deploy troops.
Read More
A federal judge’s decision blocked President Trump’s plan to deploy the Oregon National Guard to Portland, sparking a high-profile legal battle over executive power. The ruling, from a Trump-appointed judge, addressed the legality of sending federalized troops into a U.S. city amid protests and the broader constitutional relationships between the White House, Congress, and the states. The state of Oregon and the city of Portland argued that the deployment was unconstitutional. The Justice Department has appealed the ruling, and further court proceedings are scheduled.
Read More
In response to the Trump administration’s deployment of National Guard members to Oregon, a federal judge issued a new, broader order preventing any National Guard members from being relocated from any state for federal service in Oregon. The judge found the administration was directly violating her prior order, which found no justification for federalized military presence in the state, particularly after learning that California and Texas National Guard members were being sent. The judge argued that the administration lacked a legal basis for bringing federalized National Guard members into Oregon, further asserting that there was no threat of rebellion or other valid reason for the deployments. Ultimately, the judge’s ruling was based on her prior findings that there was no credible legal justification for the deployment of National Guard members in Portland, and the court found the reassignment of National Guard members appeared to violate both federal law and the 10th Amendment.
Read More
President Trump deployed 300 California National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, despite a federal court order blocking the move and defying a federal order. This action followed a judge’s ruling that blocked Trump’s attempt to deploy active-duty troops, citing violations of the Constitution and federal law. California Governor Gavin Newsom condemned the deployment as a power grab and vowed to sue in response, as the unrest in Portland continues to escalate at an ICE detention center. Trump’s actions are in response to continued protests and clashes with federal agents that have taken place since June.
Read More
Newsom to sue over Trump sending California National Guard to Oregon: This is a big deal, and it’s pretty clear why. It looks like Governor Newsom is gearing up for a legal showdown over the former president’s move to deploy the California National Guard to Oregon. It’s a bold step, and it’s getting a lot of attention, understandably.
Newsom to sue over Trump sending California National Guard to Oregon: The core of the issue seems to be about who gets to call the shots with the National Guard. When the Guard is under state control, the governor has the authority. But when the President federalizes them, that authority shifts.… Continue reading
President Donald Trump deployed 300 California National Guard members to Oregon on Sunday, despite a court order that blocked the Pentagon from sending Oregon’s National Guard to Portland. The judge cited that the president’s claims were “untethered to the facts” and rejected the Pentagon’s claim that Portland faced a “danger of rebellion.” Governor Gavin Newsom denounced the move as an abuse of power, vowing to sue, while the White House defended the action, claiming it was to protect federal assets following violent riots. This comes after California previously won a court victory against the Pentagon regarding the use of the National Guard for domestic policing.
Read More
Donald Trump’s homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem, described Chicago as a “war zone” following the shooting of a woman by federal agents, a characterization contested by Illinois Governor JB Pritzker. Noem defended the administration’s intervention, highlighting the deployment of the National Guard and the removal of alleged criminals from the streets. Pritzker accused the administration of escalating the crisis, condemning the federal deployment and its ultimatum to utilize state troops. The events followed Trump’s authorization to deploy National Guard members to Chicago, mirroring a pattern of intervention in other cities.
Read More
President Trump has authorized the deployment of 300 National Guard troops to Chicago, citing “ongoing violent riots and lawlessness” as justification. This decision follows threats to send troops to the city, despite criticism from Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, who called the move unnecessary and un-American. Concurrently, a federal judge temporarily blocked the deployment of 200 National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, deeming the protests insufficient to warrant federalized forces, and potentially harming state sovereignty. The Trump administration plans to appeal this ruling, emphasizing the need to protect federal assets and personnel amidst violent riots.
Read More
U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut issued a temporary restraining order blocking the deployment of 200 National Guard troops to Portland after the state and city sued to prevent the federalization. The judge cited constitutional concerns, arguing the president’s actions undermined Oregon’s sovereignty and blurred the lines between civil and military federal power, granting a temporary restraining order, which could be extended, based on a likelihood of success on the merits. The ruling stems from a memo ordering the National Guard’s federalization and deployment, which was also opposed by the Oregon governor, who stated there was no insurrection or threat warranting the troops. The Trump administration has appealed the ruling, which followed a similar court decision in California against the use of the National Guard, and the president has indicated interest in deploying troops to other cities as well.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood