Newsom to sue over Trump sending California National Guard to Oregon: This is a big deal, and it’s pretty clear why. It looks like Governor Newsom is gearing up for a legal showdown over the former president’s move to deploy the California National Guard to Oregon. It’s a bold step, and it’s getting a lot of attention, understandably.
Newsom to sue over Trump sending California National Guard to Oregon: The core of the issue seems to be about who gets to call the shots with the National Guard. When the Guard is under state control, the governor has the authority. But when the President federalizes them, that authority shifts.… Continue reading
President Donald Trump deployed 300 California National Guard members to Oregon on Sunday, despite a court order that blocked the Pentagon from sending Oregon’s National Guard to Portland. The judge cited that the president’s claims were “untethered to the facts” and rejected the Pentagon’s claim that Portland faced a “danger of rebellion.” Governor Gavin Newsom denounced the move as an abuse of power, vowing to sue, while the White House defended the action, claiming it was to protect federal assets following violent riots. This comes after California previously won a court victory against the Pentagon regarding the use of the National Guard for domestic policing.
Read More
Donald Trump’s homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem, described Chicago as a “war zone” following the shooting of a woman by federal agents, a characterization contested by Illinois Governor JB Pritzker. Noem defended the administration’s intervention, highlighting the deployment of the National Guard and the removal of alleged criminals from the streets. Pritzker accused the administration of escalating the crisis, condemning the federal deployment and its ultimatum to utilize state troops. The events followed Trump’s authorization to deploy National Guard members to Chicago, mirroring a pattern of intervention in other cities.
Read More
President Trump has authorized the deployment of 300 National Guard troops to Chicago, citing “ongoing violent riots and lawlessness” as justification. This decision follows threats to send troops to the city, despite criticism from Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, who called the move unnecessary and un-American. Concurrently, a federal judge temporarily blocked the deployment of 200 National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, deeming the protests insufficient to warrant federalized forces, and potentially harming state sovereignty. The Trump administration plans to appeal this ruling, emphasizing the need to protect federal assets and personnel amidst violent riots.
Read More
U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut issued a temporary restraining order blocking the deployment of 200 National Guard troops to Portland after the state and city sued to prevent the federalization. The judge cited constitutional concerns, arguing the president’s actions undermined Oregon’s sovereignty and blurred the lines between civil and military federal power, granting a temporary restraining order, which could be extended, based on a likelihood of success on the merits. The ruling stems from a memo ordering the National Guard’s federalization and deployment, which was also opposed by the Oregon governor, who stated there was no insurrection or threat warranting the troops. The Trump administration has appealed the ruling, which followed a similar court decision in California against the use of the National Guard, and the president has indicated interest in deploying troops to other cities as well.
Read More
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker announced that the US Department of Defense issued an ultimatum, threatening to federalize 300 National Guard troops in Chicago unless the state deployed its own troops. This move follows President Trump’s plans to utilize certain cities as military training grounds, despite declining crime rates in areas where federal troops have already been deployed. Pritzker condemned the demand as un-American, emphasizing the lack of need for military presence in Illinois and vowing to defend the state’s residents. Meanwhile, reports also surfaced of leaked plans to send the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division to Portland.
Read More
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller condemned a recent ruling that halted President Trump’s deployment of National Guard soldiers to Portland, Oregon. Miller asserted the President’s authority as commander-in-chief, claiming local law enforcement failed to protect ICE officers from “terrorist assault.” U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, ruled against the deployment, stating the President’s decision was “untethered to the facts,” and issued a temporary restraining order. The case is set to continue with a trial date scheduled for October 29th, as the President has deployed soldiers to other Democrat-led cities in recent months.
Read More
A federal judge appointed by Donald Trump has blocked the president’s deployment of the National Guard to Portland, Oregon, asserting that the justification of civil unrest was unsubstantiated. Judge Karin Immergut stated the deployment risked violating the Constitution, citing that claims of violence targeting immigration authorities were false. The judge’s decision followed Trump’s announcement describing Portland as “war-ravaged” and ordering troops to protect ICE facilities. Oregon Governor Tina Kotek praised the ruling, emphasizing the importance of the rule of law and the absence of an insurrection in Portland.
Read More
Trump to federalize Illinois National Guard, Pritzker says – this is the core of the matter, a situation that’s understandably generating a lot of reaction. The immediate thought is, “The jack boots are upon us.” It’s a phrase that captures the underlying anxiety, the feeling that something fundamental is shifting, that perhaps we’re witnessing the erosion of established norms.
The playbook, it seems, was already written, with echoes of past administrations and figures like Stephen Miller, already involved in previous attempts. The key aspect to remember is that federalizing the National Guard doesn’t automatically equate to law enforcement deployment. It’s a distinction that seems vital, but also potentially misleading.… Continue reading
A federal judge in Oregon issued a temporary restraining order, blocking the Trump administration from deploying the National Guard to Portland, citing the president exceeding constitutional authority. The ruling comes amid the administration’s efforts to crack down on Democratic-led cities. The judge found that the incidents cited by the administration did not warrant the use of the National Guard. Similar efforts have also been attempted in Chicago, where the administration cited protests and unrest to justify the deployment of federal troops.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker