Former President Obama has criticized President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to U.S. cities, deeming it a politicization of the military and a potential undermining of democracy. Obama highlighted the importance of civilian control over the military, referencing the Posse Comitatus Act, and pointed out that a president should only deploy the military domestically in extraordinary emergencies. He contrasted Trump’s actions with his own, noting that when troops were deployed during his administration, they were under the command of state governors. Obama also raised concerns about the impact on local communities and law enforcement.
Read More
In a recent analysis, it is argued that President Trump could potentially use the U.S. military to exert control over Americans. The author points to the deployment of troops in cities against the wishes of local authorities as evidence of acclimating the public to military presence. Concerns are raised due to the firing of top legal military officers, suggesting an intent to circumvent legal constraints. This is further compounded by Trump’s statements about combating drug cartels and the potential for extending this to domestic actions. Ultimately, the author suggests that while the military remains a significant obstacle, the potential for its politicization is concerning.
Read More
During an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press,” Vice President Vance stated that President Trump is considering all options regarding the Insurrection Act, potentially deploying the U.S. military domestically for law enforcement purposes. This comes amid discussions of federalizing National Guard troops in cities like Portland and Chicago, moves that have faced legal challenges. While Vance mentioned the president has not felt the need to invoke the Insurrection Act, he cited attacks on law enforcement as the issue and accused the media of accepting this. The administration’s attempts to deploy National Guard troops have been met with legal blocks, with appeals courts weighing in on the matter.
Read More
Judge April Perry released a full opinion justifying her decision to block President Trump from deploying Texas National Guard troops in Chicago, citing concerns about the administration’s grasp on reality. Perry’s ruling stated the administration’s justification for deployment did not meet the necessary criteria, finding no evidence of rebellion or significant disorder. She criticized the administration’s conflation of protests with riots and a lack of objectivity. Perry concluded the administration’s perceptions were unreliable, supporting the decision to block the deployment.
Read More
The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has blocked the Trump administration from deploying the National Guard in Illinois, while allowing federalization to remain in place. This decision follows the Trump administration’s appeal of a previous ruling that temporarily halted the deployment of troops. The action comes as President Trump considers using the Insurrection Act and has faced pushback from Democratic leaders in Illinois and Oregon, who are challenging the deployment of National Guard troops in their states through ongoing litigation. Furthermore, a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel in California is currently reviewing a similar case involving the deployment of National Guard troops in Oregon.
Read More
Recent court rulings signal a growing resistance to the Trump administration’s actions. Judges are pushing back against the federalization of the National Guard, with one judge stating that the president cannot punish those with opposing views. Furthermore, another judge issued a temporary restraining order to prevent ICE agents from violating First Amendment rights, including ordering agents to wear visible identification. However, not all courts are in agreement, as a panel of judges, including Trump appointees, have shown a willingness to give the president unchecked discretion in deploying the National Guard. These legal battles highlight the critical constitutional questions at stake, specifically the balance of power and the protection of civil liberties.
Read More
National Guard troops began patrolling in Memphis, Tennessee, while a judge blocked their deployment in the Chicago area, resulting in planning and training by Illinois soldiers. The Memphis patrols, which included armed Guard members escorted by local police, were focused on targeting violent offenders, according to city officials. This action follows a legal battle stemming from the Trump administration’s push to send the Guard to several U.S. cities, with Democratic officials opposing the deployments. The order in Illinois is set to expire soon, while a federal appeals court is hearing arguments over the president’s authority to deploy troops in Portland.
Read More
In response to Chicago and Illinois’ request, US District Judge April Perry issued a partial temporary restraining order against President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops in Chicago. The judge cited unreliable descriptions from the Department of Homeland Security, stating there was no credible evidence of a rebellion. Perry asserted that federal law only allows presidential federalization of the National Guard under specific conditions, none of which were met. This ruling follows a pattern of legal challenges and restraining orders in other cities like Portland, with contrasting responses from governors regarding the National Guard’s deployment.
Read More
The White House shared video footage of Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Florida, falsely presenting it as occurring in Chicago while deploying National Guard troops to the city. The footage, which included images of palm trees, was used by Trump to criticize Chicago’s mayor and governor, falsely portraying the city as chaotic. Illinois officials have condemned this misleading tactic, pointing out the misrepresentation of the situation. Despite a lawsuit challenging the deployment of National Guard troops, they arrived in Chicago to protect federal personnel, leading to protests and a temporary court order restricting the use of certain munitions.
Read More
Recently resurfaced testimony from Brigadier General Alan R. Gronewold before Oregon lawmakers has sparked debate amidst uncertainty surrounding President Trump’s troop deployment plans in Portland. Gronewold stated that National Guard soldiers were to be trained in “protective crowd control” and would be present to protect protesters. The general also clarified that the soldiers, under federalization, would fall under the control of the U.S. Northern Command and not his chain of command. This is while the court is deciding on Trump’s ability to deploy troops from other states.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker