Trump Administration’s actions are poised to escalate the military presence in Washington, D.C. following the tragic shooting of two National Guard members. This event, occurring amidst an already tense political climate and a court order to reduce military presence, raises serious concerns about the administration’s intentions. It’s difficult to ignore the potential for this incident to be exploited to further an agenda of increased control and an authoritarian direction.
The timing of this shooting is, to put it mildly, suspect. Given the court order demanding the removal of troops, the fact that such an event occurred shortly after is extremely difficult to disregard.… Continue reading
During a press conference regarding a shooting near the White House, FBI Director Kash Patel announced a manhunt for the shooter, vowing to bring them to justice. However, Metropolitan Police Executive Assistant Chief Jeffery Carroll quickly clarified that the suspect was already in custody at a hospital. The suspect, later identified as 29-year-old Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national, was apprehended at the scene. This incident adds to the controversy surrounding Patel’s tenure, which has previously been marked by missteps and questions of transparency.
Read More
The National Guard, with units in all US states and territories, serves diverse roles including disaster response, border security, and overseas deployments. While reporting to the Department of Defense, their support is typically requested at the state level, though they can be federalized under presidential authority. Notably, Guard members do not have law enforcement powers. Recently, the National Guard was deployed in Washington D.C., as part of an initiative.
Read More
On Wednesday, two National Guard members were critically injured in a shooting near the White House, according to a law enforcement official. The suspect in custody was also shot and sustained non-life-threatening injuries. Emergency responders transported all three victims to a hospital, as law enforcement agencies, including the Secret Service and ATF, investigated the scene. President Trump was briefed on the incident, and local officials were monitoring the situation. The shooting occurred amidst a heightened National Guard presence in the capital following an emergency order issued in August.
Read More
A U.S. District Court judge recently ruled the National Guard’s deployment to Washington, D.C. was illegal. Judge Jia Cobb determined the Pentagon overstepped its authority by ordering troops for non-military crime-deterrence without city leadership’s permission. This stemmed from the former president’s deployment of the National Guard to combat perceived rising crime, despite crime statistics actually decreasing. The court found the president lacked authority to federalize law enforcement in American cities, particularly in Washington, D.C.
Read More
In a recent ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Jia Cobb declared the Pentagon’s deployment of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., illegal, asserting the military exceeded its authority by engaging in non-military crime deterrence without the city’s permission. The judge determined former President Trump, who ordered the deployment citing misrepresented crime statistics, lacked the power to federalize law enforcement within the city. Cobb’s ruling, which is stayed until December 11, could significantly impact Trump’s plans to leverage the National Guard for immigration enforcement in other cities.
Read More
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to end the deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., citing the president’s illegal intrusion on local law enforcement authority. The court found that while the president can protect federal assets, he cannot unilaterally deploy the D.C. National Guard for crime control. The judge has put the order on hold for 21 days to allow for an appeal. This decision follows a lawsuit from D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb and other court challenges regarding similar deployments in other cities, such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and Portland, Oregon.
Read More
U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut issued a permanent injunction blocking President Trump from deploying the National Guard to Portland. The decision, the fourth time Immergut has blocked the deployment, comes after a trial where the city and states argued the federal government exceeded its authority, despite acknowledging some violence during protests. Immergut concluded the President lacked a lawful basis for federalizing the Guard, noting that the protests had become predominately peaceful. The court also addressed the Trump administration’s misrepresentation of the number of federal officers deployed.
Read More
**Judge permanently blocks deployment of National Guard to Portland, saying Trump exceeded his authority**
The news that a judge permanently blocked the deployment of the National Guard to Portland is a welcome development, a clear indication that a branch of government is actively scrutinizing and attempting to curtail the overreach of presidential power. This ruling, specifically citing that Trump exceeded his authority, is important and serves as a critical check and balance. The judge’s decision, based on the fact that Trump’s deployment was “untethered from the facts” and reality, should ideally be straightforward, and the fact that it is even a victory to be celebrated points to the erosion of basic legal principles in these times.… Continue reading
In a recent ruling, a federal judge issued a permanent injunction against President Trump, preventing the deployment of National Guard troops to Oregon. The judge determined the president exceeded his authority in federalizing the Guard, as the criteria for doing so, namely a danger of rebellion and obstruction of federal law enforcement, were not met. The ruling found Trump’s actions violated federal law and the 10th Amendment. The court’s decision, however, does not preclude future deployments if conditions warrant it, and the government is expected to appeal the decision.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker
ICE Claims “System Crash” Wipes Evidence One Day After Lawsuit
A U.S. District Court judge recently ruled the National Guard’s deployment to Washington, D.C. was illegal. Judge Jia Cobb determined the Pentagon overstepped its authority by ordering troops for non-military crime-deterrence without city leadership’s permission. This stemmed from the former president’s deployment of the National Guard to combat perceived rising crime, despite crime statistics actually decreasing. The court found the president lacked authority to federalize law enforcement in American cities, particularly in Washington, D.C.
Read More