The National Guard, with units in all US states and territories, serves diverse roles including disaster response, border security, and overseas deployments. While reporting to the Department of Defense, their support is typically requested at the state level, though they can be federalized under presidential authority. Notably, Guard members do not have law enforcement powers. Recently, the National Guard was deployed in Washington D.C., as part of an initiative.
Read More
On Wednesday, two National Guard members were critically injured in a shooting near the White House, according to a law enforcement official. The suspect in custody was also shot and sustained non-life-threatening injuries. Emergency responders transported all three victims to a hospital, as law enforcement agencies, including the Secret Service and ATF, investigated the scene. President Trump was briefed on the incident, and local officials were monitoring the situation. The shooting occurred amidst a heightened National Guard presence in the capital following an emergency order issued in August.
Read More
A U.S. District Court judge recently ruled the National Guard’s deployment to Washington, D.C. was illegal. Judge Jia Cobb determined the Pentagon overstepped its authority by ordering troops for non-military crime-deterrence without city leadership’s permission. This stemmed from the former president’s deployment of the National Guard to combat perceived rising crime, despite crime statistics actually decreasing. The court found the president lacked authority to federalize law enforcement in American cities, particularly in Washington, D.C.
Read More
In a recent ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Jia Cobb declared the Pentagon’s deployment of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., illegal, asserting the military exceeded its authority by engaging in non-military crime deterrence without the city’s permission. The judge determined former President Trump, who ordered the deployment citing misrepresented crime statistics, lacked the power to federalize law enforcement within the city. Cobb’s ruling, which is stayed until December 11, could significantly impact Trump’s plans to leverage the National Guard for immigration enforcement in other cities.
Read More
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to end the deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., citing the president’s illegal intrusion on local law enforcement authority. The court found that while the president can protect federal assets, he cannot unilaterally deploy the D.C. National Guard for crime control. The judge has put the order on hold for 21 days to allow for an appeal. This decision follows a lawsuit from D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb and other court challenges regarding similar deployments in other cities, such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and Portland, Oregon.
Read More
U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut issued a permanent injunction blocking President Trump from deploying the National Guard to Portland. The decision, the fourth time Immergut has blocked the deployment, comes after a trial where the city and states argued the federal government exceeded its authority, despite acknowledging some violence during protests. Immergut concluded the President lacked a lawful basis for federalizing the Guard, noting that the protests had become predominately peaceful. The court also addressed the Trump administration’s misrepresentation of the number of federal officers deployed.
Read More
**Judge permanently blocks deployment of National Guard to Portland, saying Trump exceeded his authority**
The news that a judge permanently blocked the deployment of the National Guard to Portland is a welcome development, a clear indication that a branch of government is actively scrutinizing and attempting to curtail the overreach of presidential power. This ruling, specifically citing that Trump exceeded his authority, is important and serves as a critical check and balance. The judge’s decision, based on the fact that Trump’s deployment was “untethered from the facts” and reality, should ideally be straightforward, and the fact that it is even a victory to be celebrated points to the erosion of basic legal principles in these times.… Continue reading
In a recent ruling, a federal judge issued a permanent injunction against President Trump, preventing the deployment of National Guard troops to Oregon. The judge determined the president exceeded his authority in federalizing the Guard, as the criteria for doing so, namely a danger of rebellion and obstruction of federal law enforcement, were not met. The ruling found Trump’s actions violated federal law and the 10th Amendment. The court’s decision, however, does not preclude future deployments if conditions warrant it, and the government is expected to appeal the decision.
Read More
In a legal defeat for the Trump administration, a federal judge ruled that the deployment of National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, was unlawful. The ruling, made by U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, permanently blocks the use of military force to quell protests, rejecting the administration’s claim of a rebellion justifying the troops. This decision, which followed an earlier interim order, comes after the city of Portland and the Oregon Attorney General’s Office sued, arguing the administration exaggerated violence to justify the deployment. The Justice Department is likely to appeal the ruling, potentially leading the case to the Supreme Court.
Read More
A federal judge in Oregon has issued a permanent injunction preventing the Trump administration from deploying the National Guard in Portland to address protests against immigration policies. The judge, appointed during Trump’s term, ruled that the deployment was unjustified because there was no rebellion or inability to execute federal laws. Oregon officials and the California Attorney General celebrated the decision, calling Trump’s actions an abuse of power and a win for the rule of law. The Justice Department, however, immediately appealed the ruling, arguing the deployment was necessary to address violence and protect federal personnel and property, and the case remains ongoing.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
ICE Claims “System Crash” Wipes Evidence One Day After Lawsuit
A U.S. District Court judge recently ruled the National Guard’s deployment to Washington, D.C. was illegal. Judge Jia Cobb determined the Pentagon overstepped its authority by ordering troops for non-military crime-deterrence without city leadership’s permission. This stemmed from the former president’s deployment of the National Guard to combat perceived rising crime, despite crime statistics actually decreasing. The court found the president lacked authority to federalize law enforcement in American cities, particularly in Washington, D.C.
Read More