Governor Newsom filed an emergency request with a federal court to prevent the Trump administration from utilizing National Guard and Marine troops in Los Angeles immigration raids, arguing that such action would exacerbate existing tensions. This follows President Trump’s deployment of approximately 4,700 troops in response to protests against intensified immigration enforcement. The federal government countered that Newsom’s request is unprecedented and would hinder their operations; a hearing is scheduled for Thursday. The governor contends that the troops’ involvement in raids, instead of solely protecting federal buildings, will escalate civil unrest. Local officials, including the police chief, oppose the military presence, asserting it hinders their ability to manage the protests effectively.
Read More
Kristi Noem’s stance on federalizing the National Guard shifted dramatically depending on the political affiliation of the governor involved. She vehemently opposed President Biden’s potential deployment to Texas, citing it as an attack on states’ rights. However, she enthusiastically supported President Trump’s deployment to Los Angeles, justifying it as necessary to ensure public safety and immigration enforcement. Noem’s rationale for this reversal centered on her assessment of each governor’s decision-making capabilities. This contrasting response highlights a significant partisan divide in views on federal intervention in state affairs.
Read More
White House border czar Tom Homan clarified that there are no current plans to arrest California Governor Gavin Newsom, despite President Trump’s suggestion to the contrary. Homan emphasized that arrests would only occur if individuals, regardless of position, committed crimes against ICE officers, leaving the decision to the Justice Department. While Homan supports the deployment of National Guard and Marine Corps troops to Los Angeles, citing property damage and assaults on ICE agents, Newsom contests the legality of this action and has filed a lawsuit. The escalating conflict centers on differing opinions regarding the handling of protests sparked by ICE actions in Los Angeles.
Read More
Hundreds rallied in Dallas to protest intensified deportation efforts and show solidarity with Los Angeles protestors facing harsh responses, including tear gas and potential deployment of National Guard troops. Dallas police initially blocked bridge access before declaring the assembly unlawful and deploying pepper balls to disperse the largely peaceful demonstration. Protesters expressed anger at the administration’s actions, fearing for family and friends who are undocumented. The Dallas protest highlighted concerns about increased ICE activity and a potential new state law requiring local law enforcement cooperation with ICE, adding to existing tensions.
Read More
President Trump’s federalization and deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles without state consent has prompted Governor Newsom to sue the administration, claiming the action is illegal and unconstitutional. Trump, in response, publicly advocated for Newsom’s arrest, escalating the conflict. California Attorney General Bonta supports the lawsuit, arguing that the president overstepped his authority and that the governor retains command of the National Guard. This unprecedented action, likened to President Johnson’s intervention in Alabama in 1965, raises concerns about federal overreach and potential authoritarianism.
Read More
Following a weekend of protests against ICE raids and National Guard deployment in Los Angeles, President Trump escalated tensions with violent rhetoric on social media, threatening protesters with harsh repercussions and labeling them “insurrectionists.” He further endorsed the arrest of California Governor Gavin Newsom, despite a lack of legal basis, highlighting a disregard for legal processes. This aggressive stance, echoing previous inflammatory statements, showcases the President’s increasing embrace of authoritarian tactics. The President’s actions, including the deployment of the National Guard under questionable circumstances, demonstrate a willingness to disregard legal constraints and potentially incite further unrest.
Read More
Governor Gavin Newsom accused President Trump of lying about a phone conversation concerning the deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles. Newsom stated that Trump, during their Friday night conversation, failed to mention the deployment despite later publicly claiming otherwise. This action, deemed unlawful by Newsom and Mayor Bass, followed immigration raids and escalated tensions in the city. Newsom announced an impending lawsuit against the Trump administration for this unauthorized intervention, characterizing the president’s actions as inflammatory and a breach of state sovereignty.
Read More
Over 700 Marines have been mobilized to Los Angeles, joining approximately 1,700 National Guard members already deployed. This deployment, ordered by President Trump without the consent of state or city officials, significantly escalates the military presence at the protests. The Marines’ specific role remains unclear, though they are expected to augment the National Guard and are prohibited from law enforcement unless the Insurrection Act is invoked. The action is unprecedented, with Governor Newsom calling it “unwarranted,” while the Marines’ deployment is described as supporting federal personnel and property.
Read More
A resurfaced 2020 video shows President Trump stating that National Guard deployment requires a governor’s request, directly contradicting his recent actions in California. Despite California Governor Newsom’s request to withdraw the National Guard, Trump deployed 2,000 troops to Los Angeles, leading to arrests and escalating violence. Newsom subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging Trump illegally federalized the National Guard and threatened to deploy troops to other states without governors’ consent. Trump responded by suggesting Newsom’s arrest.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker