A federal appeals court temporarily blocked a lower court’s order requiring President Trump to relinquish control of approximately 4,000 California National Guard members he federalized. The appeals court found it likely that the President lawfully exercised his authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406, rejecting Governor Newsom’s claims of legal violations. While the court acknowledged some procedural irregularities, it deemed them inconsequential given the deferential standard of review afforded to the President’s actions regarding national security. The ruling, however, did not fully accept the Justice Department’s arguments regarding judicial oversight.
Read More
Seven hundred troops have been deployed to support Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Florida, Louisiana, and Texas, providing logistical and administrative aid but not participating in law enforcement. This deployment follows a recent surge in ICE raids across these states, resulting in numerous arrests and deportations. The move comes amidst rising immigration enforcement spending, despite budget concerns and opposition from some, including Elon Musk. These actions are part of the Trump administration’s broader anti-immigration agenda.
Read More
Senator Alex Padilla’s forceful removal from a DHS news conference highlights the administration’s potential for unchecked actions beyond public view. His ejection, despite his clear identification as a U.S. Senator, raises concerns about how individuals without such status are treated. Padilla sought answers regarding the federalization of the National Guard and the targeting of undocumented immigrants for deportation, questions met with inadequate responses. This incident underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability from the administration.
Read More
Judge Charles Breyer ruled President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles illegal, citing violations of the Tenth Amendment and exceeding presidential authority. The order returns control of the California National Guard to the state, effective immediately. Breyer’s decision also highlighted threats to protesters’ First Amendment rights and the state’s inability to utilize the Guard for essential services. The Trump administration has appealed the ruling, while Governor Newsom warned of a broader threat to state sovereignty and democracy nationwide.
Read More
A federal judge ruled President Trump’s federalization of the California National Guard illegal, ordering the immediate return of control to Governor Newsom. This action, unprecedented in U.S. history, involved approximately 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines deployed to quell anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. The judge found Trump’s actions exceeded his statutory authority and violated the Tenth Amendment, citing the absence of conditions justifying federal intervention. While a temporary stay allows the administration to appeal, a hearing is scheduled for June 20th to consider a more permanent injunction.
Read More
LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell refuted President Trump’s claim that the Los Angeles Police Department requested National Guard intervention for immigration protests. McDonnell stated that the LAPD followed established protocols, utilizing internal resources and mutual aid from other agencies before considering such a request, a stage they haven’t reached. He emphasized the department’s ability to handle the situation without federal assistance, directly contradicting Trump’s assertion of necessity. The White House has yet to respond to requests for comment.
Read More
Following ICE raids in Los Angeles, protests erupted, prompting President Trump to illegally federalize the National Guard and deploy 2,000 Marines, despite Governor Newsom’s objection and the absence of any rebellion. This action, deemed unlawful by legal experts and military leaders, risks escalating the situation due to the Marines’ lack of crowd-control training. Newsom subsequently filed a lawsuit challenging the deployment, while the potential invocation of the Insurrection Act further heightens concerns about the use of the military against civilians. This unprecedented mobilization presents a significant legal and ethical dilemma for service members.
Read More
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) asserted that President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to quell Los Angeles protests constitutes impeachable offenses, a position shared at a Tri-Caucus press conference. Clarke deemed the action an “authoritarian escalation,” a wasteful expenditure of taxpayer funds, and an overreaction to peaceful protests against immigration raids. This follows two previous impeachment efforts against Trump, although neither gained sufficient support within the Democratic caucus. The current Republican-controlled Congress makes further impeachment proceedings unlikely.
Read More
The Department of Homeland Security has requested over 20,000 National Guard troops to assist with immigration enforcement nationwide, at an estimated cost of $3.6 billion annually. These troops would aid in fugitive apprehension, riot control at detention centers, and the transportation of detainees, including unaccompanied minors. Military bases across the country are being assessed as potential detention sites for an anticipated increase in migrants. This request raises concerns about the militarization of domestic law enforcement and the potential impact on public perception of the military.
Read More
In a televised address, Governor Newsom condemned President Trump’s deployment of military forces to quell immigration protests in Los Angeles, characterizing the action as a grave threat to American democracy. He warned that this escalation marks a perilous moment for the nation’s legal norms and predicted similar actions in other states. Newsom framed Trump’s actions, including the federal takeover of the California National Guard, as an intentional “inflaming” of an already tense situation. The Governor urged Americans to actively resist what he described as an assault on democratic principles.
Read More