Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) asserted that President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to quell Los Angeles protests constitutes impeachable offenses, a position shared at a Tri-Caucus press conference. Clarke deemed the action an “authoritarian escalation,” a wasteful expenditure of taxpayer funds, and an overreaction to peaceful protests against immigration raids. This follows two previous impeachment efforts against Trump, although neither gained sufficient support within the Democratic caucus. The current Republican-controlled Congress makes further impeachment proceedings unlikely.
Read More
The Department of Homeland Security has requested over 20,000 National Guard troops to assist with immigration enforcement nationwide, at an estimated cost of $3.6 billion annually. These troops would aid in fugitive apprehension, riot control at detention centers, and the transportation of detainees, including unaccompanied minors. Military bases across the country are being assessed as potential detention sites for an anticipated increase in migrants. This request raises concerns about the militarization of domestic law enforcement and the potential impact on public perception of the military.
Read More
In a televised address, Governor Newsom condemned President Trump’s deployment of military forces to quell immigration protests in Los Angeles, characterizing the action as a grave threat to American democracy. He warned that this escalation marks a perilous moment for the nation’s legal norms and predicted similar actions in other states. Newsom framed Trump’s actions, including the federal takeover of the California National Guard, as an intentional “inflaming” of an already tense situation. The Governor urged Americans to actively resist what he described as an assault on democratic principles.
Read More
Governor Newsom filed an emergency request with a federal court to prevent the Trump administration from utilizing National Guard and Marine troops in Los Angeles immigration raids, arguing that such action would exacerbate existing tensions. This follows President Trump’s deployment of approximately 4,700 troops in response to protests against intensified immigration enforcement. The federal government countered that Newsom’s request is unprecedented and would hinder their operations; a hearing is scheduled for Thursday. The governor contends that the troops’ involvement in raids, instead of solely protecting federal buildings, will escalate civil unrest. Local officials, including the police chief, oppose the military presence, asserting it hinders their ability to manage the protests effectively.
Read More
Kristi Noem’s stance on federalizing the National Guard shifted dramatically depending on the political affiliation of the governor involved. She vehemently opposed President Biden’s potential deployment to Texas, citing it as an attack on states’ rights. However, she enthusiastically supported President Trump’s deployment to Los Angeles, justifying it as necessary to ensure public safety and immigration enforcement. Noem’s rationale for this reversal centered on her assessment of each governor’s decision-making capabilities. This contrasting response highlights a significant partisan divide in views on federal intervention in state affairs.
Read More
White House border czar Tom Homan clarified that there are no current plans to arrest California Governor Gavin Newsom, despite President Trump’s suggestion to the contrary. Homan emphasized that arrests would only occur if individuals, regardless of position, committed crimes against ICE officers, leaving the decision to the Justice Department. While Homan supports the deployment of National Guard and Marine Corps troops to Los Angeles, citing property damage and assaults on ICE agents, Newsom contests the legality of this action and has filed a lawsuit. The escalating conflict centers on differing opinions regarding the handling of protests sparked by ICE actions in Los Angeles.
Read More
Hundreds rallied in Dallas to protest intensified deportation efforts and show solidarity with Los Angeles protestors facing harsh responses, including tear gas and potential deployment of National Guard troops. Dallas police initially blocked bridge access before declaring the assembly unlawful and deploying pepper balls to disperse the largely peaceful demonstration. Protesters expressed anger at the administration’s actions, fearing for family and friends who are undocumented. The Dallas protest highlighted concerns about increased ICE activity and a potential new state law requiring local law enforcement cooperation with ICE, adding to existing tensions.
Read More
President Trump’s federalization and deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles without state consent has prompted Governor Newsom to sue the administration, claiming the action is illegal and unconstitutional. Trump, in response, publicly advocated for Newsom’s arrest, escalating the conflict. California Attorney General Bonta supports the lawsuit, arguing that the president overstepped his authority and that the governor retains command of the National Guard. This unprecedented action, likened to President Johnson’s intervention in Alabama in 1965, raises concerns about federal overreach and potential authoritarianism.
Read More
Following a weekend of protests against ICE raids and National Guard deployment in Los Angeles, President Trump escalated tensions with violent rhetoric on social media, threatening protesters with harsh repercussions and labeling them “insurrectionists.” He further endorsed the arrest of California Governor Gavin Newsom, despite a lack of legal basis, highlighting a disregard for legal processes. This aggressive stance, echoing previous inflammatory statements, showcases the President’s increasing embrace of authoritarian tactics. The President’s actions, including the deployment of the National Guard under questionable circumstances, demonstrate a willingness to disregard legal constraints and potentially incite further unrest.
Read More
Governor Gavin Newsom accused President Trump of lying about a phone conversation concerning the deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles. Newsom stated that Trump, during their Friday night conversation, failed to mention the deployment despite later publicly claiming otherwise. This action, deemed unlawful by Newsom and Mayor Bass, followed immigration raids and escalated tensions in the city. Newsom announced an impending lawsuit against the Trump administration for this unauthorized intervention, characterizing the president’s actions as inflammatory and a breach of state sovereignty.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker