Thousands of protestors rallied in Washington, D.C. Saturday against the Trump administration’s crime crackdown, organized by the Free DC Project. The demonstration, titled “We Are All DC: A National March,” aimed to end the administration’s perceived occupation of the city. This protest followed a lawsuit filed by D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb challenging the legality of National Guard patrols, which have been extended through November. Despite protestors’ claims, crime rates, while previously low, have continued to decrease since the federal enforcement surge, and the federal takeover of the D.C. police force is set to expire without Congressional action.
Read More
Governors from several states are expressing deep concerns about President Trump’s potential use of military assets to disrupt upcoming elections. They believe Trump may attempt to influence or even take control of elections by deploying the National Guard and federal agents to key cities. These governors warn that such actions could be a tactic to suppress voter turnout and undermine democratic processes, possibly by falsely claiming issues with elections. They further highlight his public criticism of mail-in voting and his past efforts to subvert election results, emphasizing the urgency to address these actions, which are reminiscent of historical authoritarian strategies.
Read More
Officials in Washington, D.C., are suing the Trump administration, alleging the president violated the Constitution and federal law by deploying thousands of National Guard troops into the city without local consent. The lawsuit claims the troops, many from out of state, have been deputized by the U.S. Marshals office and are conducting law enforcement activities. The deployment is argued to undermine the city’s autonomy, erode trust, and harm the local economy. While the White House claims the lawsuit is an attempt to undermine the president’s anti-crime efforts, the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court, seeks to stop the violations and preserve the District’s sovereignty.
Read More
Trump to send National Guard troops to Chicago. This is the situation we’re looking at, and it’s already raising some serious questions. Right off the bat, the big concern is the lack of any clear justification. There’s no immediate emergency – no widespread unrest, no major disaster. The usual criteria for deploying the National Guard just aren’t present. So, why is this happening?
Trump to send National Guard troops to Chicago, and the consensus seems to be that this is more about a show of force than a genuine need. It appears to be directed not at a foreign threat, but at American citizens and the elected officials of Chicago and Illinois.… Continue reading
Pritzker: Trump is Preparing to Deploy Texas National Guard Troops to Illinois
Okay, let’s break this down. The situation in Illinois, as reported by Governor Pritzker, is concerning. Apparently, there are plans to deploy the Texas National Guard to the state, with the looming presence of federal agencies like ICE preparing for immigration operations in Chicago. The Governor is painting a picture of an escalating situation, drawing parallels to the deployments seen in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. earlier this year. The core concern here is that this isn’t about crime reduction, but about political maneuvering and the potential for authoritarian overreach.… Continue reading
During a recent interview, former President Donald Trump expressed a strong inclination towards deploying the National Guard to Chicago to address the city’s ongoing crime issues. He stated that he believed this action was necessary, framing it as a potential solution to the violence plaguing the city. Trump emphasized his willingness to act, using assertive language suggesting imminent intervention. Details regarding the specific conditions for such a deployment, or any official requests from the city, were not elaborated upon during the interview.
Read More
A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration illegally deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles in response to protests against anti-immigration policies, violating the Posse Comitatus Act. The judge determined that the administration used armed soldiers and military vehicles for crowd control and other actions, despite the absence of a rebellion or inability of civilian law enforcement to respond. The ruling blocks the administration from further troop deployments in California, though the order is paused pending a potential appeal. This decision followed a lawsuit from Governor Gavin Newsom and raises concerns about the limits of presidential authority regarding the use of the military domestically.
Read More
Following clashes related to immigration raids, a federal judge blocked President Trump from deploying National Guard and military troops in California for law enforcement activities. The ruling, stemming from a lawsuit challenging the deployment, cited the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits U.S. military forces from domestic law enforcement. The decision, though limited to California and stayed until September, raises questions about the use of troops in other cities, especially considering Trump’s recent actions in Washington, D.C.
Read More
In a recent Truth Social post, Donald Trump declared Washington, D.C. a “crime-free zone” following a National Guard takeover of the city. Despite recent crime statistics from the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department reporting hundreds of crimes within the past week, including violent offenses, Trump has praised Mayor Bowser for collaborating with him to “eliminate” crime. As part of this crackdown, Trump’s administration has taken control of the city’s police department and deployed National Guard troops, FBI, and ICE agents. Attorney General Pam Bondi has also celebrated the impact of the crackdown on social media, highlighting recent arrests and firearm seizures.
Read More
President Trump has been criticized for deploying National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., to address a fabricated crime wave, where they have been tasked with menial tasks such as spreading mulch and picking up trash. This deployment of approximately 2,000 soldiers is estimated to cost over $1 million per day. The author points out the absurdity of using these troops, who should be focused on training or preparing for serious deployments, to compensate for cuts made to the National Park Service, turning them into an expensive gardening crew. This is seen as a wasteful use of taxpayer money and an insult to the soldiers’ service.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood