Senator Josh Hawley, who publicly denounced Medicaid cuts as “morally wrong,” voted in favor of a budget reconciliation bill containing an estimated $930 billion in cuts to the program. The bill’s tax cuts, disproportionately benefiting high-income households, were predicated on the false promise of expiration, with Republicans now admitting their prior deception. Furthermore, the reinstatement of state and local tax deductions, though temporary, is another example of misleading budgeting practices. Ultimately, under real scoring, the Senate bill is projected to significantly increase the budget deficit, yet the Republican’s preferred scoring method attempts to hide this fact.
Read More
The looming insolvency of the US Social Security and Medicare systems by 2033, as recently announced by government trustees, presents a significant challenge. This isn’t a new problem; it’s a long-standing issue that has been repeatedly highlighted for decades, prompting concerns and frustration among citizens. The consistent postponement of necessary action has led to a sense of disillusionment, particularly for those who have diligently contributed to these programs, yet fear they might not fully reap the benefits.
The core issue boils down to insufficient funding to meet the projected future payouts. This shortfall is not simply a matter of inadequate contributions; it’s also a consequence of structural flaws within the systems themselves.… Continue reading
Senator Rand Paul vehemently opposes the proposed budget bill, citing a projected $5 trillion increase to the national deficit as his primary reason for dissent. This stance directly contradicts President Trump’s support for the legislation. Paul’s criticism centers on the bill’s inclusion of a substantial debt ceiling increase. The ensuing controversy highlights a significant rift between Paul and Trump.
Read More
The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” featuring $4 trillion in tax cuts and increased spending, is facing criticism, even from former White House advisor Elon Musk, who notes the bill increases the budget deficit. Republicans counter that the bill includes substantial spending cuts, primarily through welfare reform, and that economic growth spurred by the tax cuts will offset the increased spending. However, independent analyses, including those by the Tax Foundation, project significant deficit increases even with accounting for potential economic growth. Republicans further argue that the tax cuts are merely extensions of prior legislation and therefore shouldn’t be considered new costs.
Read More
Senate Republicans, led by Senators Johnson and Paul, express concerns over the House-passed domestic spending bill’s projected $2.3 trillion deficit increase over ten years, advocating for deeper spending cuts. While President Trump anticipates Senate revisions, several senators, including Hawley, criticize insufficient spending reductions and potential Medicaid cuts affecting millions. House Speaker Johnson defends the bill, framing Medicaid impacts as targeting fraud and abuse, a claim disputed by Democrats who highlight potential healthcare losses for low-income individuals. The bill’s future hinges on Senate amendments and subsequent House approval before reaching the President’s desk.
Read More
The House of Representatives passed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” extending Trump-era tax cuts, despite significant budgetary and social consequences. The legislation, rushed through Congress with minimal transparency, would increase the deficit by $3.8 trillion, slash funding for programs like SNAP and Medicaid, and disproportionately benefit the wealthy while harming the poor. The Congressional Budget Office estimates millions could lose health insurance, and household resources would decrease by 4% for the poorest while increasing by 4% for the richest. This process involved obfuscation and misleading statements from Republican leadership, who downplayed the bill’s negative impacts.
Read More
Republicans are reportedly planning to offset the cost of Trump-era tax cuts by selling off public lands. This strategy, at its core, involves liquidating valuable national assets to compensate for decreased government revenue resulting from the tax cuts. The inherent problem is that this is a one-time solution to a recurring problem—a yearly budget shortfall is being addressed by a finite resource. This suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of basic fiscal responsibility. It’s like using your savings to pay your credit card bill each month; eventually, you’ll run out of savings.
This approach of selling public lands raises concerns about the long-term consequences.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood