The palace is taking decisive action to distance itself from Prince Andrew following accusations and criticism. Formally removing all titles, including “prince,” marks a significant step. Andrew will relocate from Royal Lodge to a private property at Sandringham. Sources indicate that this decision underscores the seriousness with which his actions are being viewed, although Andrew reportedly did not object to the changes.
Prince Andrew has decided to relinquish his titles, including the Duke of York, to avoid distracting from the work of the monarchy. This decision, made in consultation with King Charles and other family members, follows ongoing scrutiny of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and a reported Chinese spy. While he will remain a prince, the move means he will no longer use his title or honors. The King is reportedly pleased with the outcome, which comes amid continued allegations of sexual assault, which Prince Andrew vehemently denies.
King Charles’s recent visit to Canada and subsequent address have sparked a renewed conversation about Canada’s identity, its relationship with the United States, and the role of the monarchy in the modern era. The visit itself was a significant event, a rare occurrence not seen since 1977, chosen specifically to underscore Canada’s strength and unity at a time of geopolitical uncertainty. This carefully orchestrated event, far from being a mere formality, served as a powerful symbolic gesture.
The King’s speech, while largely drafted by the Prime Minister’s office, carried a weight that transcended mere political rhetoric. His declaration that Canada will remain “strong and free” resonated deeply with many Canadians, particularly given the current strained relationship with the United States.… Continue reading
Meghan Markle’s reported desire to be addressed as “Princess Meghan” reflects a complex interplay of personal preference and royal protocol. This name change request, if granted, would deviate from established tradition for non-working royals. The move has sparked considerable debate, highlighting the ongoing tension between the Sussexes and the British monarchy. Ultimately, the decision rests with King Charles III, whose response will be closely watched.
Following the Trump administration’s decision to overturn New York City’s congestion pricing program, Trump declared himself “king,” prompting widespread condemnation. New York Governor Kathy Hochul vowed legal action, asserting that the U.S. is a nation governed by law, not a monarchy. Several other politicians echoed this sentiment, rejecting Trump’s claim to regal authority and highlighting the illegitimacy of his intervention. The White House’s amplification of Trump’s statement further fueled the backlash.
A new royal biography by Robert Hardman has claimed that King Charles has decided to stop funding the security costs and personal allowance of his brother Prince Andrew. These costs together reportedly amount to several million pounds each year. The Prince’s personal lease on his residence, the Royal Lodge in Windsor, lasts until 2078, meaning that if he covers his own expenses, he can continue living there. The alleged termination of financial support comes in the wake of two films released by Netflix and Amazon this year about the prince’s association with US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Prince Andrew stepped down from his royal duties following his controversial interview with BBC Newsnight about his Epstein connections in 2019.
As an outsider looking in, the idea of Australia becoming a republic seems like a monumental decision. The topic of monarchy versus republic is one that has been debated for years, and the recent discussion about King Charles not standing in the way if Australia chooses to axe the monarchy brings this issue to the forefront once again.
Australia, a country known for its historic ties to the British monarchy, has always had a complex relationship with its royal connections. The idea of cutting ties with the monarchy and becoming a republic is not a new one, and while some may see it as a symbol of independence, others may view it as a drastic and unnecessary change.… Continue reading
As I sit down to ponder the latest news surrounding King Charles’ monarchy receiving a $60M pay raise, amidst the U.K.’s ongoing cost of living crisis, a wave of contrasting emotions washes over me. On one hand, the idea of a royal family receiving such a substantial increase in funds at a time when many citizens are struggling to make ends meet seems inherently unfair and disconnected from the reality of the everyday person. Yet, on the other hand, the intricacies and complexities of the financial mechanisms at play behind this headline beg for a deeper understanding and analysis.
The Crown Estate, responsible for this surge in profits due to leases for offshore windfarms, has undoubtedly bolstered the coffers of the monarchy, leading to this substantial pay increase.… Continue reading
King Charles III diagnosed with cancer, Buckingham Palace says
It’s devastating news to hear that King Charles III has been diagnosed with cancer. After waiting his whole life to become king, it seems that his body is now trying to betray him. As a urologist, my professional opinion leads me to believe that it may be bladder cancer. However, without knowing the specific details of his pathology, it’s hard to determine his prognosis.
Fortunately, the mention of “routine treatments” gives me hope that his prognosis is favorable. Around 70% of bladder tumors can be managed without major surgery or chemotherapy. So, if this is indeed the type of cancer he has, then there may be a good chance of a positive outcome.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood