A letter from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth requested the deployment of U.S. Marines in Los Angeles to arrest anti-administration protesters. This request, which bypassed the White House, sought authorization for the military to detain or arrest protesters, a power the Los Angeles Police Department deemed unnecessary and potentially problematic. The Trump administration initially defended Noem’s actions but later issued a revised statement emphasizing a “whole-of-government” approach. Concerns remain regarding the blurring of lines between military and civilian law enforcement, potentially jeopardizing civil liberties.
Read More
Amid rising tensions between the US and Iran over a stalled nuclear deal, the State Department initiated the evacuation of non-essential embassy staff from Baghdad. Simultaneously, the Pentagon authorized the departure of military dependents from the region, with personnel in Kuwait and Bahrain also on standby. President Trump cited the potential danger as the reason for the evacuations, reiterating his stance against Iran acquiring nuclear weapons. These actions follow a perceived impasse in negotiations and escalating threats from Iranian officials.
Read More
Glenn Valley Foods’ facility was searched by federal agents investigating potential employment fraud, with the company cooperating fully and facing no charges. Simultaneously, a significant deployment of military personnel to Los Angeles, criticized by local officials as excessive, is underway. Los Angeles has seen over 300 arrests related to protests, resulting in injuries to several officers. The Marines’ deployment, authorized by the Trump administration, may involve supporting ICE operations.
Read More
The Pentagon’s decision to deploy 700 Marines to Los Angeles is raising serious concerns about the blurring lines between military and civilian law enforcement. The sheer scale of the deployment, particularly in relation to the reported number of protestors, is prompting questions about the necessity and proportionality of such a response. Many are pointing out that this action seems excessive, especially considering the available resources of the National Guard.
This deployment immediately brings to mind the Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts the use of the military for domestic law enforcement purposes. The act, while amended in 2022 to include Marines and Navy personnel, still places significant limitations on military involvement in civilian affairs.… Continue reading
Following the Secretary of Defense’s threat to deploy active-duty Marines to quell protests in Los Angeles against immigration policies, several prominent Republicans voiced support. House Speaker Mike Johnson justified the potential use of Marines as a necessary measure to maintain order, citing Governor Newsom’s perceived inaction. This deployment would mark the first use of active-duty troops to suppress domestic unrest since 1992, raising concerns about potential legal violations of the Posse Comitatus Act, despite the administration’s reliance on Title 10 of the U.S. Code. Republican Senators Lankford and Mullin criticized protesters, despite actions like displaying Mexican flags being protected speech.
Read More
Escalating violence, including rock throwing and Molotov cocktails, has rendered Los Angeles authorities unable to maintain public safety. The protests are deemed “out of control” by Essayli. Consequently, the federal government will deploy resources to restore order and quell the unrest. This intervention is justified by the state’s obligation to protect its citizens. Federal intervention aims to regain control and ensure public safety.
Read More
In a significant escalation of “law and order” initiatives, President Trump’s executive order authorizes the deployment of military resources to aid local police, prompting immediate concerns regarding civil liberties violations. The order mandates a 90-day assessment by the Secretaries of Defense and Justice on the optimal utilization of military assets, training, and personnel to combat crime. Simultaneously, the order expands federal support for law enforcement while targeting jurisdictions perceived as hindering police effectiveness. This action is anticipated to face legal challenges and intense political scrutiny given potential conflicts with the Posse Comitatus Act.
Read More
Trump’s potential invocation of the Insurrection Act is a looming concern, fueled by a confluence of factors that suggest a deliberate strategy unfolding. A joint Department of Defense and Homeland Security report, due within 90 days of a presidential executive order, will recommend whether or not to invoke this Act concerning illegal migration. The urgency surrounding this report is palpable, given its potential to significantly expand presidential power.
The recent shake-up at the Pentagon, notably the dismissal of key military personnel, including the nation’s top uniformed officer and senior legal advisors from the Army, Navy, and Air Force, is deeply troubling.… Continue reading
Sweden deployed 550 troops to Latvia as part of a Canadian-led NATO brigade, marking its largest operation since joining the alliance in March 2023. The mechanized infantry battalion arrived in Riga, contributing to NATO’s deterrence efforts along its eastern flank bordering Russia and Belarus. This significant deployment underscores Sweden’s commitment to collective defense and regional stability amid heightened tensions caused by the war in Ukraine. The mission reinforces the eight NATO brigades stationed along the alliance’s eastern border. This follows Sweden’s historic decision to join NATO, ending its long-held neutrality.
Read More
The specter of a US military deployment on US soil under a Trump presidency looms large, sparking considerable debate and anxiety. The very notion feels inherently unsettling; the military, traditionally tasked with defending the nation from external threats, being deployed against its own citizens. This isn’t a hypothetical scenario confined to the fringes of political discourse; the potential for such a deployment carries a disturbingly realistic weight.
The possibility of Trump circumventing the established chain of command to mobilize troops for domestic deployment is a genuine concern. His past actions, such as the forceful dispersal of protesters in Lafayette Square, demonstrate a willingness to disregard norms and protocols to achieve his ends.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood