Testimony has surfaced indicating that Donald Trump once remarked to Bill Clinton that he had “great times” with Jeffrey Epstein. This revelation emerged during Bill Clinton’s own deposition, where he detailed his interactions with the convicted sex offender. The former president testified that while he himself was unaware of Epstein’s illicit activities at the time of their acquaintance, Trump had apparently conveyed a more positive sentiment about his experiences with Epstein.
This particular statement from Trump, as relayed by Clinton, offers a potentially significant insight into the dynamics between these prominent figures and Epstein. It suggests a level of personal engagement and enjoyment on Trump’s part, contrasting with the more guarded or perhaps simply unknowing stance Bill Clinton claimed to have maintained regarding Epstein’s criminal enterprises.… Continue reading
The commencement of Jeffrey Epstein’s deposition has prompted a significant public statement from former President Bill Clinton, offering a personal account as the proceedings begin. This moment, marked by the initiation of a deposition related to the now-infamous financier, has drawn considerable attention, and Clinton’s prepared remarks aim to address the situation directly. He frames his presence and testimony as rooted in a deep love for his country and a fundamental belief in the principle that no one, particularly former Presidents, is above the law. This assertion sets a serious and principled tone for his engagement with the unfolding events.
A central theme in Clinton’s statement is the strong assertion that his wife, Hillary Clinton, has been unfairly brought into the Epstein matter.… Continue reading
Former President Bill Clinton, in testimony to the House Oversight Committee, stated he “saw nothing and did nothing wrong” in his interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. He planned to convey that he had no knowledge of Epstein’s criminal activities and would have acted differently had he been aware. Clinton emphasized that regardless of photographic evidence, his conscience was clear regarding his own actions and observations during their association.
Read More
During a grilling by a Republican-led panel, Hillary Clinton asserted she possessed no information about Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal activities, had never met him, and called for Donald Trump to testify regarding his own documented connections. Democrats contend the investigation is politically motivated, while Republicans maintain its purpose is to understand Epstein’s network. Despite initial resistance, the Clintons agreed to testify, though the depositions are being held behind closed doors.
Read More
Secretary Kristi Noem of the Department of Homeland Security is set to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 3rd. This testimony was confirmed by an aide to panel Chair Chuck Grassley, as reported by Politico. The hearing’s focus and specific topics remain undisclosed at this time, though it is expected to address current national security concerns. The testimony will provide an opportunity for the committee to question Secretary Noem on the department’s operations and policies.
Read More
The Post’s account of Bradley’s order for a second strike, allegedly targeting survivors due to their potential to alert traffickers, raises serious legal concerns. Experts argue this rationale violates the laws of war, especially if the live drone feed shows survivors being killed. Crucially, Bradley’s testimony is needed to clarify Hegseth’s orders and explain the events. Furthermore, the push for public release of a Justice Department memo justifying the strikes, which experts deem legally weak, could reveal a potentially flawed legal basis for the actions, including preemptive claims of immunity.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker