In a recent Daily Mail column, former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson condemned a new U.S. peace plan for Ukraine, portraying it as a betrayal. Johnson argued the plan, purportedly a 28-point proposal, would effectively “castrate” Ukraine by allowing Russia control over its military and territory, including relinquishing Crimea and Donbas. He warned that accepting such terms would render Ukraine a puppet state vulnerable to further aggression, comparing it to the appeasement of Munich. Johnson’s remarks, echoing sentiments from figures like Hillary Clinton, highlight the deep divisions within the West regarding the war and its potential resolution.
Read More
In response to criticism of the president’s use of social media, Speaker Johnson defended his strategy. He argued the president uses social media effectively, leveraging satire to make his points, unlike those allegedly calling for violence against political opponents. Johnson further criticized a recent rally, falsely labeling it as anti-American, while highlighting its peaceful nature and the irony of its organizers’ stance. He contrasted the rally’s demands with the actions of a hypothetical king, pointing out how President Trump’s influence, if he were a king, would have shut down the event.
Read More
Johnson defends calling anti-Trump protests “hate America” rallies. Let’s be clear; this is a loaded statement and the core of the issue at hand. The accusation itself is a bold one, immediately framing any opposition as fundamentally unpatriotic. This instantly shuts down a lot of potential discussion, painting those protesting as enemies of the nation, rather than citizens exercising their right to voice dissent. The reality, judging by what people are saying, paints a different picture.
The common experience seems to be a complete disconnect between Johnson’s narrative and the reality on the ground. Many participants in these rallies reported seeing primarily American flags, symbols of national pride, not symbols of hatred.… Continue reading
A Los Angeles jury has found Johnson & Johnson liable in a case alleging its talc products caused the mesothelioma death of Mae Moore, awarding her family $966 million. The verdict includes $16 million in compensatory damages and $950 million in punitive damages, though the latter may be reduced on appeal. J&J plans to appeal the verdict, disputing the validity of the evidence presented and maintaining its products are safe. This recent verdict adds to the thousands of lawsuits against the company regarding its talc products, although J&J has had mixed results, including some wins, in similar trials.
Read More
Former U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson dismissed Russia’s objections to foreign troops in Ukraine, advocating for immediate deployment, regardless of Moscow’s stance. Speaking at the Yalta European Strategy conference, Johnson criticized European allies for their hesitant approach to security guarantees, which are contingent on a ceasefire that Russia shows no interest in. His proposal involves a “Coalition of the Willing” providing training and logistics, sending a clear message that Ukraine, not Russia, determines which forces are present. Johnson believes this assertive action will shift the strategic landscape in the Kremlin, signaling the West’s commitment to Ukraine.
Read More
Boris Johnson sharply criticized Donald Trump’s proposed Ukraine peace deal, arguing that it would offer Ukraine no meaningful concessions. The plan, which reportedly includes recognizing Russia’s annexation of Crimea and lifting sanctions, would leave Ukraine vulnerable to future Russian aggression. Johnson contrasted this with Ukraine’s significant sacrifices in resisting the invasion, emphasizing the need for long-term security guarantees from Western allies. He concluded that Trump’s proposal lacks a mechanism to prevent further Russian attacks.
Read More
Following failed talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, Boris Johnson expressed outrage at Putin’s rejection of a ceasefire in Ukraine. Johnson asserted that Putin’s actions demonstrate a desire to continue the war and subjugate Ukraine, viewing the situation as a mockery of Western efforts. This contrasts sharply with Johnson’s earlier prediction of Trump’s success in pressuring Putin. The outcome aligns with widespread criticism of the talks’ lack of progress, with commentators highlighting Putin’s strategic gains from the purported concessions.
Read More
Phone calls between Donald Trump and British Prime Ministers Theresa May and Boris Johnson were reportedly so unpredictable that they left Downing Street staff in tears of laughter. These conversations frequently veered off-topic, with Trump raising subjects ranging from wind turbines to the Queen’s health. His relationship with the two prime ministers differed, warmer with Johnson than with May, potentially due to May’s Brexit approach and Trump’s views on women. Tensions currently exist between Trump and current Prime Minister Keir Starmer, partly due to leaked details of a previous call and a potential ambassadorial dispute.
Read More
In a recent interview, former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson condemned Russian President Vladimir Putin’s imperial ambitions, using strong language to emphasize that Putin’s pursuit of empire is over. Johnson asserted that countries like Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Ukraine are no longer part of any Russian empire. This statement comes amidst ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, where Russia claims territorial gains and Ukraine reports repelling drone attacks and capturing North Korean soldiers fighting alongside Russian forces. The conflict continues with both sides claiming battlefield successes.
Read More
JGA Saddler, an Australian law firm, launched a class action lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson, alleging the company falsely advertised the effectiveness of phenylephrine in products like Codral and Sudafed. The lawsuit centers on the FDA’s declaration that oral phenylephrine is ineffective as a nasal decongestant, contradicting Johnson & Johnson’s marketing claims. This action followed the replacement of pseudoephedrine with phenylephrine after pseudoephedrine sales restrictions, potentially leaving consumers with ineffective congestion relief. Consumers who purchased these products since 2005 may be eligible for compensation if the lawsuit is successful.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood