Internal documents and statements from Meta, YouTube, TikTok, and Snapchat reveal that these social media giants were aware of the addictive nature of their platforms and the potential harm to teens, yet continued to target them. According to a newly unsealed legal filing, internal communications show executives acknowledging that the platforms’ designs could be harmful to users’ mental health, with one internal message comparing Instagram to a drug and another noting minors lack the executive function to control screen time. The lawsuit, brought by several school districts and individuals, alleges that the companies prioritized profit over user safety by deliberately designing features to maximize youth engagement and advertising revenue. While the companies deny the allegations, the filing raises questions about the effectiveness of safety features and their awareness of the platforms’ negative impact.
Read More
Meta is earning a fortune on a deluge of fraudulent ads, documents show, and that’s the core of the problem. Internal projections from late last year revealed that Meta anticipated raking in about 10% of its annual revenue, a staggering $16 billion, from running ads for scams and illegal goods. Think about that for a moment. This isn’t a small side hustle; it’s a major revenue stream.
Further investigation by Reuters uncovered a consistent pattern of failure. For at least three years, Meta has struggled to identify and stop a flood of ads that expose billions of users on Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp to various forms of fraud.… Continue reading
The White House unveiled a list of 37 donors funding the new ballroom construction project, following the demolition of the East Wing. The project’s cost has escalated to over $300 million, with President Trump stating it would not use taxpayer money. Donors include major tech companies like Meta and Apple, defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, and various private and family donors. The donations will be made to the nonprofit Trust for the National Mall, but the specific donation amounts for all individuals and organizations were not revealed.
Read More
Instagram shows more ‘eating disorder adjacent’ content to vulnerable teens, internal Meta research shows, and that’s a pretty disturbing reality we need to grapple with. It’s like the platform, driven by algorithms designed to maximize engagement, is actively pushing users towards content that preys on their insecurities, fears, and vulnerabilities. This isn’t just about showing someone more of what they like; it’s about exploiting their weaknesses for profit.
The core issue seems to be that Meta’s algorithm is fundamentally built to capitalize on our obsessions, often those related to our perceived shortcomings. It’s almost as if the system is designed to identify and then amplify negative thought patterns.… Continue reading
Dutch court orders Meta to change Facebook and Instagram to default to non-profiled timelines, and this could be a real game-changer. It’s about time we got a bit of control back over our feeds, isn’t it? Imagine opening Facebook or Instagram and seeing posts from your friends and family, in the order they were posted. No more random articles from who-knows-where, no more curated content designed to keep you scrolling. Just the people you actually care about, sharing their lives.
This change, ordered by a Dutch court, mandates that Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, must offer users a “direct and simple” way to opt out of the algorithm-driven timelines.… Continue reading
Meta sparked controversy by using back-to-school photos of young schoolgirls in targeted advertisements for its Threads platform, specifically shown to a 37-year-old man. These images, sourced from parents’ public Instagram posts, were repurposed without explicit consent, prompting outrage from parents who felt the practice was exploitative and potentially sexualized. Meta defended its actions, stating the images didn’t violate its policies and were part of its recommendation system, but the targeted advertising to a specific demographic raised concerns about children’s online safety and privacy. Critics, including a crossbench peer, condemned Meta’s prioritization of profit over child safety, urging regulatory bodies like Ofcom to address the issue.
Read More
Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Threads, is facing a lawsuit from relatives of October 7th victims. The lawsuit alleges Meta facilitated the spread of Hamas’s massacre by allowing livestreams and broadcasts of the attacks, including footage of the victims’ murders. The plaintiffs claim this caused significant emotional distress and further amplified the trauma of the events. The lawsuit highlights the role of social media platforms in the dissemination of violent content and its impact on those affected by the tragedy.
Read More
Reports indicate that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is facing allegations of infidelity, with claims of a “months-long, discreet relationship” corroborated by multiple sources within the tech industry. These accusations have triggered scrutiny of Zuckerberg’s public image and leadership, especially considering his previous controversies. While no public statements have been made by Zuckerberg or Meta representatives, the allegations have been acknowledged by Elon Musk, with a humorous nod to Zuckerberg. Industry observers suggest the scandal could have significant implications for Meta, as public and shareholder sentiment may play a role in how the tech giant navigates the controversy.
Read More
Meta, led by Mark Zuckerberg, is facing a multi-billion dollar lawsuit from shareholders who claim the company violated a 2012 agreement to protect user data. The lawsuit stems from the 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal, where user data was harvested without consent and used for political purposes. Shareholders seek reimbursement for fines and other costs Meta incurred due to the controversy. Legal experts view the case as unusual and a creative way to address corporate governance and potentially strengthen data protection as tech companies continue to develop AI.
Read More
In a recent legal victory for Meta, a judge ruled in favor of the company in a copyright lawsuit filed by authors who alleged their works were used without permission to train Meta’s AI system. The judge determined that the authors failed to provide sufficient evidence of market harm caused by Meta’s AI, classifying the use of copyrighted material as “fair use”. This ruling follows a similar decision in favor of Anthropic, another AI company, though the judge acknowledged the complexities of the copyright issues surrounding AI training. Furthermore, the judge expressed sympathy for the authors’ argument that AI models may undermine the market for creative works.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood