Following the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, also known as ICE Barbie, has faced scrutiny and criticism for her characterization of the event. Multiple sources indicate that Noem has placed blame on Stephen Miller, the architect of the administration’s immigration policies, for the controversial statements made about Pretti. Miller, in turn, has deflected responsibility, citing information provided by Customs and Border Protection, which falls under Noem’s department. This comes amidst a backdrop of backlash over the shooting, with officials scrambling to control the narrative and defend their actions in the aftermath of the incident.
Read More
Lord Mandelson stated he was “kept separate” from Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual misconduct due to his own sexuality, and he maintained he was unaware of Epstein’s actions. In his first interview since being fired as the UK’s ambassador to the US over his links to Epstein, he did not apologize to Epstein’s victims, asserting he was not “culpable” or “knowledgeable.” Mandelson also expressed regret for the victims who were not given the protection they deserved. He was fired after emails emerged showing supportive messages he had sent to Epstein after the American was convicted for soliciting prostitution from a minor.
Read More
Republican Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has expressed concern regarding federal drug trafficking charges against his family’s former bodyguard, Justin Salsburey. Salsburey and his wife, Ruthann Rankin, are accused of conspiring to distribute large quantities of narcotics via mail. The security firm that employed Salsburey immediately removed him from the Ramaswamy family’s detail upon learning of the charges. Despite passing multiple background checks and drug tests, Salsburey is currently being held in jail.
Read More
Justice Dept. Now Said to Be Reviewing 5.2 Million Pages of Epstein Files – this announcement immediately sets off alarm bells, doesn’t it? It’s a staggering amount of documentation, especially when considering the initial narrative that these files either didn’t exist or weren’t readily accessible. The shift in story, from absence to needing time for review, feels deeply problematic.
A huge scandal is unfolding right before our eyes, and the question that begs to be asked is, “Why are they just *now* reviewing these files?” If these documents truly existed, and a law mandated their release, the delays and explanations offered simply don’t add up.… Continue reading
The White House has reportedly seized control of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) X account to manage the fallout from the release of the Epstein files, a move prompted by negative public relations for President Trump. The DOJ’s handling of the files, including problematic redactions and the release of unverified documents, has drawn criticism and calls for accountability, particularly regarding compliance with the Epstein Transparency Act. One instance includes a fake letter that named Trump. Despite the lack of evidence of wrongdoing, the administration is reportedly frustrated by the ongoing controversy and the remaining 700,000 files still to be reviewed.
Read More
On Christmas night, Donald Trump posted on Truth Social, defending himself against accusations of ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump claimed he dropped Epstein before it was popular, while also calling out the “sleazebags” who associated with Epstein. Trump’s post criticized Democrats and alluded to the unreleased Epstein files, which contain names of individuals. The former president’s statement came despite past comments praising Epstein, with the DOJ still in the process of releasing Epstein-related documents, and the legal deadline already passed.
Read More
Trump recently claimed to have distanced himself from Jeffrey Epstein before it was popular, but this assertion was met with skepticism. Marijke Chartouni, who alleges she was sexually abused by Epstein, responded to Trump’s comment on X, suggesting that his statement implied a confession. Her concise message, “Every accusation is a confession,” reflected her disbelief in Trump’s distancing strategy.
Read More
Trump fails to put Epstein behind him with partial release of files because the reality is the so-called release was more of a carefully orchestrated withholding. The documents that emerged were riddled with redactions, leaving vast swathes of information hidden from view. This approach, rather than clearing the air, has only served to fuel suspicion and intensify the perception of guilt. If the intention was to exonerate, a full, unredacted release would have been the obvious strategy. Instead, the selective nature of the release screams of something to hide, a desperate attempt to control the narrative rather than offer genuine transparency.… Continue reading
During an interview with Vanity Fair, Donald Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, confirmed the president’s name appears in the Epstein files but denied any wrongdoing. Wiles described Trump and Epstein as “young, single playboys together.” The article also mentions Trump’s claims of having a falling out with Epstein years ago and his denial of sending a birthday card to Epstein. Furthermore, Wiles disagreed with Trump’s claims about Bill Clinton’s involvement, stating that “the president was wrong.”
Read More
Democrat: Latest Epstein photo cache shows ‘people engaged in sexual acts’, and the implications are, frankly, significant, and it’s understandable why people are reacting with a mixture of intrigue, frustration, and, let’s be honest, a touch of morbid curiosity. The release of this new batch of photos from the Epstein estate is stirring up a lot of conversation, and the core of the discussion revolves around what these images reveal and what they don’t. The assertion that the photos show “people engaged in sexual acts” immediately elevates the stakes. This isn’t just about who was hanging out with Epstein; it’s about the nature of those interactions.… Continue reading
Noem’s “Following Orders” Defense: ICE Secretary Throws Miller Under Bus
Following the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, also known as ICE Barbie, has faced scrutiny and criticism for her characterization of the event. Multiple sources indicate that Noem has placed blame on Stephen Miller, the architect of the administration’s immigration policies, for the controversial statements made about Pretti. Miller, in turn, has deflected responsibility, citing information provided by Customs and Border Protection, which falls under Noem’s department. This comes amidst a backdrop of backlash over the shooting, with officials scrambling to control the narrative and defend their actions in the aftermath of the incident.
Read More
Mandelson Claims No Girls Seen at Epstein’s Properties: Skepticism and Scrutiny
Lord Mandelson stated he was “kept separate” from Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual misconduct due to his own sexuality, and he maintained he was unaware of Epstein’s actions. In his first interview since being fired as the UK’s ambassador to the US over his links to Epstein, he did not apologize to Epstein’s victims, asserting he was not “culpable” or “knowledgeable.” Mandelson also expressed regret for the victims who were not given the protection they deserved. He was fired after emails emerged showing supportive messages he had sent to Epstein after the American was convicted for soliciting prostitution from a minor.
Read More
Vivek Ramaswamy’s Bodyguard Arrested on Drug Charges Sparks Controversy
Republican Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has expressed concern regarding federal drug trafficking charges against his family’s former bodyguard, Justin Salsburey. Salsburey and his wife, Ruthann Rankin, are accused of conspiring to distribute large quantities of narcotics via mail. The security firm that employed Salsburey immediately removed him from the Ramaswamy family’s detail upon learning of the charges. Despite passing multiple background checks and drug tests, Salsburey is currently being held in jail.
Read More
Justice Department Reviews 5.2 Million Epstein Files, Raising Questions
Justice Dept. Now Said to Be Reviewing 5.2 Million Pages of Epstein Files – this announcement immediately sets off alarm bells, doesn’t it? It’s a staggering amount of documentation, especially when considering the initial narrative that these files either didn’t exist or weren’t readily accessible. The shift in story, from absence to needing time for review, feels deeply problematic.
A huge scandal is unfolding right before our eyes, and the question that begs to be asked is, “Why are they just *now* reviewing these files?” If these documents truly existed, and a law mandated their release, the delays and explanations offered simply don’t add up.… Continue reading
Trump Allies Allegedly Control Epstein Messaging, Sparking Outrage
The White House has reportedly seized control of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) X account to manage the fallout from the release of the Epstein files, a move prompted by negative public relations for President Trump. The DOJ’s handling of the files, including problematic redactions and the release of unverified documents, has drawn criticism and calls for accountability, particularly regarding compliance with the Epstein Transparency Act. One instance includes a fake letter that named Trump. Despite the lack of evidence of wrongdoing, the administration is reportedly frustrated by the ongoing controversy and the remaining 700,000 files still to be reviewed.
Read More
Trump’s Epstein Files Threat: “Merry Christmas” to “Losers” Facing Downfall
On Christmas night, Donald Trump posted on Truth Social, defending himself against accusations of ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump claimed he dropped Epstein before it was popular, while also calling out the “sleazebags” who associated with Epstein. Trump’s post criticized Democrats and alluded to the unreleased Epstein files, which contain names of individuals. The former president’s statement came despite past comments praising Epstein, with the DOJ still in the process of releasing Epstein-related documents, and the legal deadline already passed.
Read More
Epstein Survivor: Trump’s Words Sound Like a Confession
Trump recently claimed to have distanced himself from Jeffrey Epstein before it was popular, but this assertion was met with skepticism. Marijke Chartouni, who alleges she was sexually abused by Epstein, responded to Trump’s comment on X, suggesting that his statement implied a confession. Her concise message, “Every accusation is a confession,” reflected her disbelief in Trump’s distancing strategy.
Read More
Trump’s Epstein File Release Backfires, Fuels Guilt Narrative
Trump fails to put Epstein behind him with partial release of files because the reality is the so-called release was more of a carefully orchestrated withholding. The documents that emerged were riddled with redactions, leaving vast swathes of information hidden from view. This approach, rather than clearing the air, has only served to fuel suspicion and intensify the perception of guilt. If the intention was to exonerate, a full, unredacted release would have been the obvious strategy. Instead, the selective nature of the release screams of something to hide, a desperate attempt to control the narrative rather than offer genuine transparency.… Continue reading
Trump’s Chief of Staff: Trump in Epstein Files, Were “Young, Single Playboys”
During an interview with Vanity Fair, Donald Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, confirmed the president’s name appears in the Epstein files but denied any wrongdoing. Wiles described Trump and Epstein as “young, single playboys together.” The article also mentions Trump’s claims of having a falling out with Epstein years ago and his denial of sending a birthday card to Epstein. Furthermore, Wiles disagreed with Trump’s claims about Bill Clinton’s involvement, stating that “the president was wrong.”
Read More
Democrat: Epstein Photo Cache Shows “People Engaged in Sexual Acts”
Democrat: Latest Epstein photo cache shows ‘people engaged in sexual acts’, and the implications are, frankly, significant, and it’s understandable why people are reacting with a mixture of intrigue, frustration, and, let’s be honest, a touch of morbid curiosity. The release of this new batch of photos from the Epstein estate is stirring up a lot of conversation, and the core of the discussion revolves around what these images reveal and what they don’t. The assertion that the photos show “people engaged in sexual acts” immediately elevates the stakes. This isn’t just about who was hanging out with Epstein; it’s about the nature of those interactions.… Continue reading