A U.S. judge approved the Justice Department’s request to dismiss the criminal case against Boeing related to the 737 MAX crashes, which resulted in 346 fatalities, including 18 Canadians. Though the judge disagreed, he stated he lacked the authority to reject the decision, criticizing the agreement for failing to ensure accountability and the safety of the public. Boeing has committed to honoring its obligations, but the judge’s assessment pointed to a concerning lack of sufficient accountability in the deal, despite the government’s argument that Boeing’s improvements and FAA oversight were adequate. Boeing’s pre-trial settlements and the ongoing lawsuits, including the damages assessment related to the death of passenger Shikha Garg, highlight the complex legal aftermath of these tragic events.
Read More
Despite a guilty plea last year, the Department of Justice is reportedly dropping criminal charges against Boeing in favor of a non-criminal settlement. This settlement will add $444.5 million to the crash victims’ fund, but families of the 346 victims killed in two 737 Max crashes are outraged, deeming it insufficient and a betrayal of justice. The decision stems from Boeing’s withdrawal of its guilty plea and subsequent assertion of a litigation risk, a claim disputed by victims’ attorneys. Families intend to challenge this decision in court.
Read More
A US judge’s rejection of Boeing’s plea deal in the fatal 737 MAX crashes underscores a profound failure of corporate accountability. Boeing’s attempt to minimize their culpability, initially blaming pilot error, reveals a disturbing disregard for human life. The argument that the pilots were at fault ignores the crucial fact that Boeing knowingly withheld critical information about the MCAS system, a flight control system implicated in the crashes.
This omission was not an oversight; it was a deliberate decision driven by a desire to avoid the costs associated with pilot retraining. The company’s executives prioritized profit over safety, demonstrating a shocking level of corporate negligence.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood