A federal judge in Texas has granted the government’s request to dismiss the criminal conspiracy charge against Boeing related to the 737 Max crashes, which resulted in 346 fatalities. As part of the agreement, Boeing will pay an additional $1.1 billion in fines and compensation. This resolution comes despite the judge’s statement that the deal “fails to secure the necessary accountability to ensure the safety of the flying public.” The Justice Department maintains the resolution is the most just outcome, though some of the victims’ families plan to appeal the decision.
Read More
A U.S. judge approved the Justice Department’s request to dismiss the criminal case against Boeing related to the 737 MAX crashes, which resulted in 346 fatalities, including 18 Canadians. Though the judge disagreed, he stated he lacked the authority to reject the decision, criticizing the agreement for failing to ensure accountability and the safety of the public. Boeing has committed to honoring its obligations, but the judge’s assessment pointed to a concerning lack of sufficient accountability in the deal, despite the government’s argument that Boeing’s improvements and FAA oversight were adequate. Boeing’s pre-trial settlements and the ongoing lawsuits, including the damages assessment related to the death of passenger Shikha Garg, highlight the complex legal aftermath of these tragic events.
Read More
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed a $3.1 million fine against Boeing due to safety violations occurring between September 2023 and February 2024. These violations include those related to the January 2024 Alaska Airlines incident where a door plug panel blew out on a 737 Max 9. The FAA identified hundreds of quality system violations at Boeing’s 737 factory in Renton, Washington, and Spirit AeroSystems’ 737 factory in Wichita, Kansas, along with instances of employees pressuring ODA members. Boeing is reviewing the proposed penalty and stated they are working to improve safety and quality assurance.
Read More
A U.S. judge is holding a hearing to determine whether to approve a deal between the Justice Department and Boeing, allowing the planemaker to avoid prosecution for a criminal fraud charge related to two fatal 737 Max crashes. Family members of the 346 victims are objecting to the agreement, which would release Boeing from oversight by an independent monitor, deeming it insufficient. The initial plea deal was rejected, and the new non-prosecution agreement includes additional financial compensation to victims’ families. Boeing maintains the executive branch has the sole authority to decide on prosecution and has asked the judge to dismiss the objections.
Read More
The Justice Department has moved to dismiss criminal fraud charges against Boeing, ending the prosecution related to two 737 Max crashes that resulted in 346 deaths. This agreement requires Boeing to pay over $1.1 billion, including additional compensation for victims’ families, in exchange for dismissal. While some victims’ families sought a public trial and harsher penalties, the deal avoids a potential criminal conviction that could impact Boeing’s federal contractor status. Judge O’Connor will ultimately decide whether to accept the motion to dismiss and the terms of the non-prosecution agreement.
Read More
The Justice Department has reached a deal with Boeing, averting criminal prosecution for misleading regulators about the 737 Max. This agreement involves Boeing paying over $1.1 billion, including $445 million for victims’ families, in exchange for dismissal of fraud charges. The deal avoids a potential criminal conviction that could have impacted Boeing’s federal contractor status. While some victims’ families and senators opposed the non-prosecution agreement, the Justice Department maintains this resolution provides financial accountability and benefits for future air travel safety. Boeing will also retain an independent consultant to oversee compliance.
Read More
Despite a guilty plea last year, the Department of Justice is reportedly dropping criminal charges against Boeing in favor of a non-criminal settlement. This settlement will add $444.5 million to the crash victims’ fund, but families of the 346 victims killed in two 737 Max crashes are outraged, deeming it insufficient and a betrayal of justice. The decision stems from Boeing’s withdrawal of its guilty plea and subsequent assertion of a litigation risk, a claim disputed by victims’ attorneys. Families intend to challenge this decision in court.
Read More
Boeing is poised to escape criminal prosecution in the 737 Max crashes case, a decision that has enraged victims’ families. The Department of Justice is reportedly considering a non-prosecution agreement, avoiding a guilty plea for the company despite the deaths of 346 people in two fatal crashes. This proposed agreement follows a previous rejected plea deal and ongoing concerns about Boeing’s safety practices. The families involved have strongly condemned the potential non-prosecution agreement as morally unacceptable. Boeing’s stock price has slightly decreased following the news.
Read More
A Boeing 737 MAX destined for Xiamen Airlines returned to Seattle due to the escalating US-China trade war and resulting tariffs. The plane, valued at approximately $55 million, completed a lengthy journey back to the US after facing significant import duties. This incident highlights the disruption caused by the 125% tariff imposed by China on US goods, potentially impacting numerous other aircraft deliveries. Uncertainty surrounding tariff changes has left several aircraft deliveries in a state of flux, with some airlines considering delaying deliveries to avoid the substantial financial burden.
Read More
A federal judge rejected Boeing’s plea agreement concerning the 737 Max crashes, citing concerns over the selection process for an independent safety monitor. The judge criticized the Justice Department’s control over the monitor’s selection and Boeing’s past performance under a similar agreement. The plea deal included a $487 million fine, deemed insufficient by victims’ families who argued for a much larger penalty. The judge’s rejection highlights concerns about public confidence and the need for greater judicial oversight in corporate accountability cases. This decision likely necessitates a renegotiation of the plea agreement.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker