Younger Democrats are increasingly vocal about the need for a frank discussion regarding age and leadership within the party. This isn’t simply about replacing older politicians with younger ones; it’s about acknowledging the potential limitations that age can impose on effectiveness and responsiveness to the needs of a rapidly changing world.
The current generation of younger Democrats feels that a significant portion of the electorate is disconnected from reality, susceptible to manipulation, and more likely to vote based on emotional appeals rather than policy substance. They believe this vulnerability is being exploited, leading to questionable political choices.
This isn’t a new issue.… Continue reading
Elon Musk’s America PAC held a rally in Green Bay, awarding two $1 million checks to petition signers, ostensibly to boost voter turnout in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race. This action, mirroring similar efforts in prior elections, is viewed by some as a potentially illegal attempt to buy votes by incentivizing petition signing and offering further financial rewards for supporting his preferred candidate, Brad Schimel. The winners’ affiliations raise questions about the selection process, given one winner’s connection to a major Republican donor and the other’s role with the Wisconsin College Republicans. This strategy aims to influence the close election between Schimel and Susan Crawford.
Read More
Elon Musk distributed $1 million to two individuals in Wisconsin, ostensibly to encourage Republican voter turnout in the upcoming Supreme Court election. However, one recipient, Nicholas Jacobs, is the chairman of the Wisconsin College Republicans, prompting accusations of the giveaway being rigged to benefit a specific political group. This follows Musk’s prior similar actions in swing states and despite Wisconsin law prohibiting payments influencing voters. Musk, who has invested nearly $20 million to support a conservative candidate, claims the election is crucial to humanity’s future.
Read More
The rise of a second Trump presidency is a complex issue, but a significant factor often overlooked is the role of influential YouTubers and podcasters in mobilizing a substantial segment of the male population towards the political right. An analysis of thousands of videos reveals a clear pattern of how this influence operates, subtly yet effectively shaping political views and driving increased voter turnout.
The ease with which viewers can be drawn into this content without initially recognizing the underlying political agenda is concerning. Many platforms subtly push this type of content through algorithms designed to maximize engagement, inadvertently creating a highly effective echo chamber.… Continue reading
The 2024 election, despite warnings from both candidates about its importance, saw 90 million Americans abstain from voting, a number exceeding Trump’s vote total. This alarming non-participation, particularly among younger, more diverse, and less affluent demographics, contributed to Trump’s victory and poses a significant threat to American democracy. Addressing this requires tackling the problem directly, potentially through mandatory voting, a system successfully employed in other countries like Australia, resulting in consistently high voter turnout. Implementing mandatory voting in the U.S., perhaps starting at the state level, would not only increase participation but also send a crucial message about the value of civic engagement.
Read More
Donald Trump’s 2024 victory, while securing 312 electoral votes, fell short of a claimed “massive mandate,” achieving only 49.8% of the popular vote. His Electoral College win was exceptionally narrow, hinging on razor-thin margins in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. A shift of fewer than 115,000 votes across these three states would have given the victory to Kamala Harris. This highlights the highly contested nature of the election and undermines Trump’s claims of widespread support.
Read More
The 2024 US presidential election saw high turnout, yet an estimated 90 million eligible Americans did not vote—a number exceeding the votes for either major candidate. Many non-voters cited the Electoral College as rendering their votes insignificant in their respective states. Other reasons included dissatisfaction with both candidates, a perception that neither represented working-class interests, and policy disagreements, particularly regarding the candidates’ stances on issues like Israel and climate change. Finally, some expressed disillusionment with the two-party system and extreme political polarization.
Read More
Democratic losses in the 2024 election cannot be attributed to a simple “wokeness” narrative; the results show a closer-than-expected race driven primarily by decreased Democratic turnout, not a massive rightward shift. This lower turnout stemmed from several factors including tangible economic anxieties exacerbated by ineffective messaging on inflation and the perception of Democrats as unable or unwilling to fight for everyday Americans. Finally, a widespread belief among voters that both Democrats and Republicans are untrustworthy further hampered the Democratic campaign.
Read More
Claims that millions of votes were “missing” after the 2024 U.S. presidential election are false. These votes were not missing but simply hadn’t been counted yet. Due to the decentralized nature of U.S. elections, with thousands of local elections run simultaneously, reporting results can take time. The Associated Press, which calls elections in the U.S., relies on data from county election offices and state websites, and makes projections based on vote trends and the number of uncounted ballots. While the AP called the election for Trump, millions of ballots were still being counted, primarily due to high rates of mail-in voting in certain states. It’s important to wait for all votes to be tallied and official totals released before drawing conclusions about voter turnout between elections.
Read More
Vice President Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign saw a significant drop in support compared to Joe Biden’s 2020 victory, with analysts citing various factors. While millions of voters who supported Biden in 2020 did not vote for Harris, experts attribute this decline to Biden’s unpopularity, economic anxieties related to inflation, and potential misogyny among some voters. Additionally, the Biden-Harris administration’s support for Israel in its conflict with Hamas, particularly in Arab American communities, may have contributed to lower turnout among Democrats. Despite the loss, Harris remains optimistic about the future, emphasizing the importance of continued fighting for American ideals.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker