Former President Donald Trump has reiterated his intention to revoke the citizenship of naturalized Americans, particularly those he deems as undermining domestic tranquility. This declaration follows the shooting of National Guard members in D.C. by an Afghan national. Trump stated that he would denaturalize individuals who “shouldn’t be here,” blaming the current administration for their presence. However, he acknowledged uncertainty regarding the extent of his authority to do so.
Read More
Following the New York City mayoral election, Republican lawmakers expressed intentions to prevent Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani from assuming office, fueled by unsubstantiated claims regarding his citizenship. These detractors, including high-profile figures, have requested investigations into Mamdani’s naturalization process, accusing him of communist and “terrorist” ties without providing evidence. Immigration law experts assert that such accusations are flimsy, as the process of denaturalization requires clear proof of fraud or material misrepresentation. These experts emphasize that there is no credible evidence to support these claims, highlighting the rarity and high standards required for revoking a person’s citizenship.
Read More
House Republicans are calling for a probe into NYC mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani’s path to citizenship, potentially seeking his denaturalization. The investigation, spearheaded by Reps. Randy Fine and Andy Ogles, alleges that Mamdani, a naturalized citizen who immigrated from Uganda, made false statements during the citizenship process, including failing to disclose his association with the Democratic Socialists of America. Ogles has further cited Mamdani’s support for the “Holy Land Five,” and called him an antisemite, socialist, and communist. The Justice Department has neither confirmed nor denied any investigation.
Read More
Following the recent arrival of his German passport, a Palestinian man, identified as Abdallah, lost his newly granted citizenship after posting a picture of Hamas fighters with a supportive caption. Germany’s interior ministry revoked his citizenship, reflecting the country’s stricter stance on supporting Hamas and its commitment to Israel. This action aligns with Germany’s updated citizenship laws, which emphasize respect for its democratic values and historical responsibility toward Jewish life, including acknowledging Israel’s right to exist. While Germany has blocked citizenship applications based on similar grounds, Abdallah’s case is a rare instance of citizenship being revoked, highlighting the country’s strong support for Israel since the October 7th attacks.
Read More
Second US appeals court rejects Trump’s order curtailing birthright citizenship. Well, isn’t that something? The second court of appeals has now tossed out Trump’s attempt to chip away at birthright citizenship. You know, the one enshrined in the 14th Amendment? This isn’t just a legal issue; it strikes at the very heart of who we are as Americans. It’s about the promise of equal protection under the law, a promise that’s been a cornerstone of our nation since the Civil War.
This whole situation is like watching a slow-motion train wreck. You know where it’s headed: potentially all the way to the Supreme Court.… Continue reading
The First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston has ruled that the Trump administration cannot withhold citizenship from children born to individuals in the country illegally or temporarily, solidifying the mounting legal setbacks for the president’s birthright order. This ruling marks the fifth federal court since June to either issue or uphold orders blocking the order, concluding that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed in their claims based on the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. The court upheld preliminary injunctions, which block the order that would have halted automatic citizenship for babies born to people in the U.S. illegally or temporarily. The case is expected to move quickly back to the Supreme Court, where the administration hopes to be vindicated.
Read More
The Trump administration has appealed to the Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of the president’s executive order regarding birthright citizenship, arguing that the long-held understanding of the 14th Amendment is “mistaken.” This appeal follows lower court rulings that have blocked the policy, citing the Constitution and precedent, including the case of *US v. Wong Kim Ark*. The administration contends the policy is crucial for border security, asserting that American citizenship should only be granted to those lawfully entitled. The ACLU, which has been involved in lawsuits against the order, has voiced opposition, calling the order illegal.
Read More
The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of an executive order that would end birthright citizenship, marking the second time this year the issue has been brought before the justices. The administration’s appeal argues that the long-held understanding of the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to those born in the U.S., is “mistaken.” The order was blocked by lower courts, with the administration now seeking a final ruling to resolve the issue. The executive order, signed in January, stated that the federal government will not recognize the U.S. citizenship of children born on American soil to parents who were in the country unlawfully or temporarily.
Read More
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will now screen immigrants seeking legal pathways to live and work in the U.S. for “anti-Americanism,” raising concerns about subjective judgments in rejecting applicants. Officers will consider whether an applicant has “endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused” anti-American views. The policy’s vagueness regarding what constitutes “anti-Americanism” has ignited worries that it could open the door for bias. Legal experts are divided on the constitutionality of the policy, with some arguing it violates free speech rights, while others believe the First Amendment does not protect non-citizens.
Read More
In response to a Supreme Court decision, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released a memo outlining plans to revoke citizenship from children born to immigrants, including those with temporary legal status. The memo envisions federal review of parents’ documentation, potentially in hospitals, to determine a newborn’s citizenship status. The plan would deny citizenship to children of immigrants who are “unlawfully present,” potentially rendering them deportable, and also includes children of those with lawful but temporary presence, such as visa holders and Dreamers. This policy change would necessitate intrusive federal involvement and create a caste-based system, putting ICE agents in maternity wards and potentially deporting babies.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood