Governors have signaled a refusal to participate in a meeting with former President Trump after it became apparent that the invitation list was exclusively comprised of Republican governors. This decision, spearheaded by Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt, marks a significant departure from the usual bipartisan nature of the National Governors Association (NGA) events. Governor Stitt, in a letter announcing the shift, emphasized that the NGA’s mission is to represent all governors, and therefore, they could not facilitate an event designed to be divisive. The core sentiment is that this exclusionary approach from Trump directly undermines the NGA’s purpose of fostering unity and collaboration among state leaders.… Continue reading
A pro-Ukrainian partisan group, Atesh, claimed responsibility for sabotaging a communication tower in Russia’s Belgorod Oblast on February 8th. The group stated that an agent destroyed ground equipment, de-energizing and disabling all infrastructure on the mast, which included antennas used for electronic warfare to suppress drone signals. This act, conducted near Ukraine’s border, reportedly blinded the enemy in the sector and created an opportunity for Ukrainian forces to circumvent signal jamming and operate drones unimpeded. This incident follows a separate development on February 5th where Russian forces were reportedly cut off from Starlink satellite internet access due to a new “white list” implemented through a collaboration between Ukraine and SpaceX.
Read More
The White House’s decision to exclude Democratic governors from its annual governors’ meeting has sparked considerable discussion, painting a picture of a deeply divided political landscape. This move, which effectively turned a potentially bipartisan gathering into a Republican-only event, has been interpreted by many as a sign of the administration’s unwillingness to engage with differing viewpoints. The exclusion is particularly noteworthy given that some Democratic governors have reportedly expressed a willingness to cooperate with the White House on shared concerns, suggesting a missed opportunity for constructive dialogue and problem-solving. The sentiment is that by choosing to limit attendance to one party, the administration is signaling that bipartisanship is no longer a priority, which is seen as a disappointing stance when national unity is arguably more crucial than ever.… Continue reading
Representative Ro Khanna has found success in bipartisan efforts by focusing on issues that resonate with both the left and right, such as holding elites accountable. The Epstein Files Transparency Act, a quick success, is an example of his methodology. Khanna’s successes include the Yemen War Powers Resolution and the Chips and Science Act, due to building trust across the aisle and understanding the nuances of Congress. Although not the most bipartisan member, Khanna’s approach focuses on common ground in areas of populist discontent, a modern strategy for building political coalitions.
Read More
On December 21st, Ukrainian partisans targeted an airfield in Russia’s Lipetsk Oblast, approximately 340 kilometers from the Ukrainian border, resulting in the destruction of two Su-30 fighter jets. The operation, which took two weeks to plan, involved a “representative of the resistance movement” successfully infiltrating the military facility, bypassing patrols and guard schedules, and setting the aircraft ablaze. This successful attack is estimated to have caused up to $100 million in damage and further weakens Russian air power, adding to the reported 432 aircraft destroyed since the full-scale invasion.
Read More
Elections, balanced government, and the separation of powers are crucial for effective governance. Currently, the Speaker is not leading in a way that allows for essential questioning, and congressional authority is being abdicated. The lack of bipartisanship and the military’s reluctance to testify without it further hinder the ability of Congress to obtain necessary information, as seen in the recent case of the Southern Command head’s resignation. This environment restricts vital conversations and transparency.
Read More
Deep in occupied Crimea, partisans cut railway feeding Russia’s Kherson and Zaporizhzhia fronts, and it’s heartening to hear. It’s impossible not to admire the sheer guts it takes to stand up to a regime as ruthless and unforgiving as the one currently occupying the region. These individuals are putting their lives on the line, fighting a government that seems to have little regard for the value of human life, even its own citizens. They are, without a doubt, heroes, and hopefully, they’ll continue their courageous work. The thought of this kind of resistance, working from the inside, is truly inspiring.
Deep in occupied Crimea, partisans cut railway feeding Russia’s Kherson and Zaporizhzhia fronts, and the implications of this action are significant.… Continue reading
An explosion damaged a railway line in Russia’s Leningrad region on October 7, causing a train carrying military cargo to derail. Ukrainian intelligence sources identified the blast as occurring on the Stroganovo–Mshinskaya route and attributed the operation to local partisans. The incident temporarily halted rail traffic, forcing rerouting of trains and causing delays. The disruption is believed to have a significant impact on Russian logistics and military capabilities, as the railway is a crucial part of military transport infrastructure.
Read More
Supreme Court approval rating has recently plummeted, hitting an all-time low, and the question on everyone’s mind is: What caused this dramatic shift? Well, it seems the answer, or rather, the multitude of answers, are staring us right in the face. It appears that the public is increasingly seeing the court as a partisan entity, driven by ideology rather than impartial legal principles. When rulings consistently favor one side of the political spectrum, especially when these decisions seem to contradict established precedents or even a straightforward reading of the law, public trust erodes.
The more the court makes what appear to be politically motivated decisions, the more its standing declines, potentially emboldening future administrations to disregard their rulings, and the very fabric of the rule of law begins to unravel.… Continue reading
This article discusses an upcoming AMA session on r/thebulwark. The author then critiques President Biden’s governance, arguing his central failure stemmed from an inaccurate assessment of American political dynamics. Biden’s strategy of incremental reform and bipartisan cooperation, intended to counter populism, proved ineffective. This failure, the author contends, overshadows other criticisms, highlighting a broader societal failing rather than solely a presidential one. The piece concludes by promising a further examination of America’s collective shortcomings.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker