Berlin’s accusation that Elon Musk is attempting to influence Germany’s election is a serious claim, fueled by concerns about the potential impact of his actions on the democratic process. The suspicion centers around Musk’s perceived support for specific political parties, raising questions about whether this constitutes illegal interference.
This situation highlights the broader issue of the unchecked influence of billionaires on global politics. In the US, for example, the ability of extremely wealthy individuals to acquire significant media holdings raises concerns about the potential for biased information and the manipulation of public opinion. This, in turn, raises the question of whether similar regulations or safeguards should exist in Germany and other democratic nations to prevent such influence.… Continue reading
Elon Musk published a pro-AfD opinion piece in Germany’s *Welt am Sonntag*, prompting the opinion editor’s resignation. Musk’s commentary, which downplayed the AfD’s extremism, follows his prior social media endorsement of the party. The newspaper’s editor-in-chief and publisher responded, acknowledging freedom of speech while criticizing Musk’s proposed solution. This event occurs ahead of Germany’s February election, where the AfD’s strong showing could impact coalition possibilities.
Read More
Senator Sanders criticized Republicans for potentially derailing a bipartisan government funding bill due to Elon Musk’s objections. Musk’s public opposition, including calls to halt all legislation until Trump’s inauguration, fueled concerns about undue billionaire influence on government policy. This action risks impacting millions of federal employees and Social Security recipients. Sanders emphasized the need to prevent billionaires from controlling government operations.
Read More
Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong blocked publication of an op-ed critical of President-elect Trump’s cabinet picks, demanding a counterpoint editorial be published simultaneously. This action, following previous interventions like withdrawing an endorsement of Kamala Harris, reflects Soon-Shiong’s efforts to shift the paper towards a more “balanced,” less liberal perspective. The incident sparked staff outrage and further fueled concerns about billionaire influence over media narratives and editorial independence. This pattern mirrors similar actions by other media owners, illustrating a broader trend of shifting media stances towards Trump.
Read More
The resignation of the LA Times editorials editor in protest of billionaire owner Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong’s alleged interference with the paper’s endorsement process for Kamala Harris speaks volumes about the current state of journalism and the ethical dilemmas posed by concentrated wealth in media ownership. This situation feels like a stark reminder that the watchdogs of democracy can themselves become compromised when they are tied to individuals whose interests lie beyond the principles of a free press. Mariel Garza’s decision to step down is not just about her disagreement over a specific editorial decision; it is emblematic of a much larger battle for the integrity of journalism in this country.… Continue reading
When I hear the words, “‘That’s Oligarchy,’ Says Sanders as Billionaires Pump Cash Into Trump Campaign — “We must overturn the disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision and move to public funding of elections,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders,” it resonates deep within me. The notion that billionaires can have such a profound impact on our democratic process is alarming. The fact that their immense wealth can sway elections, essentially buying influence and power, goes against the very foundation of democracy.
It is disheartening to see the influence of money in politics grow to such an extent that it threatens the core principles of our democracy.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker