A federal appeals court unanimously upheld a nearly $1 million penalty against Donald Trump and attorney Alina Habba for a “frivolous” lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and others. The court affirmed the lower court’s decision to dismiss the case, citing “sanctionable conduct” in filing the suit. The lawsuit, filed in 2022, alleged a conspiracy to falsely portray Trump’s campaign as colluding with Russia, but was dismissed by a lower court judge who stated that “no reasonable lawyer would have filed it.” This ruling represents another setback in Trump’s attempts to pursue legal action against his political adversaries.
Read More
A federal appeals court has upheld nearly $1 million in penalties against Donald Trump and his attorneys for their racketeering lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and other Democrats. The court agreed with the lower court’s dismissal of the lawsuit, deeming many of its legal arguments frivolous. The suit alleged Clinton conspired to create a false narrative about Trump and Russia. The presiding judge found the suit to be filled with frivolous claims intended to harass and serve a political purpose, and that Trump knew of the suit’s shortcomings.
Read More
In a recent decision, a federal appeals court upheld a nearly $1 million penalty against Donald Trump and attorney Alina Habba for filing a “frivolous” lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and others. The court, comprised of judges from different political backgrounds, found that Trump and Habba engaged in “sanctionable conduct” when they brought the suit three years prior. The lawsuit, alleging a conspiracy to fabricate claims of collusion with Russia, was dismissed by a lower court, which stated that “no reasonable lawyer would have filed” the case in the first place. The ruling is the latest setback for Trump in his attempts to punish political adversaries.
Read More
Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted by a federal grand jury in Virginia on charges of making a false statement and obstruction stemming from his 2020 testimony to Congress regarding the Hillary Clinton email investigation. U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, appointed by Trump, sought the indictment despite internal concerns about probable cause. Comey denies the charges and plans to fight them in court, asserting his innocence and expressing confidence in the judicial system. The indictment comes after President Trump pressured Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute Comey, with one of the false statement counts being dismissed by the grand jury due to lack of consensus.
Read More
Hillary Clinton: Supreme Court ‘will do to gay marriage what they did to abortion’ is a statement that has ignited a flurry of discussion and concern, and it’s not difficult to see why. The core of the worry, echoed by many, is that the current conservative majority on the Supreme Court is poised to revisit the legal protections afforded to same-sex marriage, potentially dismantling the rights that were secured by the *Obergefell v. Hodges* ruling in 2015. This fear stems from the court’s recent actions, particularly the overturning of *Roe v. Wade*, which has set a precedent for re-evaluating established rights.… Continue reading
As SCOTUS considers whether to hear a case that could threaten federal protections for same-sex marriage, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has advised same-sex couples to consider getting married. Clinton expressed concern that the court could overturn the national right to marriage equality, potentially sending the issue back to individual states for decisions. This comes as a result of a case brought by former county clerk Kim Davis, who is appealing a financial penalty after refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples post-Obergefell v. Hodges. If marriage equality were overturned, existing marriages would likely be grandfathered, but states could be given the power to halt future same-sex unions.
Read More
Republicans in the House of Representatives have issued subpoenas to both Bill and Hillary Clinton to testify before the House Oversight Committee regarding the Jeffrey Epstein affair, potentially causing a political firestorm. Simultaneously, the committee subpoenaed Trump’s Department of Justice for Epstein-related documents, indicating a push for transparency that could be damaging to the former president. This move reflects growing pressure from Republican supporters for a full investigation, even while the committee plans to depose former officials from Trump’s administration. The investigation is further complicated by speculation about potential leniency for Ghislaine Maxwell and the desire to find a resolution that leaves Trump unharmed.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood