Former President Trump declared President Biden’s pardons of January 6th Committee members invalid, citing the use of an autopen for signing the documents. This claim is baseless, as the use of an autopen for signing official documents is legally binding, per Department of Justice guidance. Trump’s assertion ignores the president’s sole authority to issue pardons, and the Constitution provides no mechanism for their reversal. Committee members have publicly dismissed Trump’s pronouncements.
Read More
Trump’s recent claim that President Biden’s pardons are “void” due to the use of an autopen is, frankly, bizarre. It’s a statement that raises more questions than it answers, and highlights the increasingly surreal nature of our current political climate. The sheer audacity of declaring another president’s official actions null and void based on the method of signing is unprecedented.
This assertion seems particularly ironic considering past claims about documents being declassified merely through mental intent. If a president can, in their mind, render something classified or unclassified, why would the use of an autopen, a technology designed to increase efficiency, suddenly invalidate a pardon?… Continue reading
In response to criticism regarding pardons granted to January 6th rioters who assaulted law enforcement, Vance asserted his continued support for these pardons. He argued that the actions of the rioters should be distinguished from what he characterized as the Department of Justice’s politically motivated prosecutions of over 1,000 individuals. This distinction, Vance implied, justified the pardons, despite the rioters’ violent acts against police. The interview highlighted a sharp disagreement over the culpability of the rioters and the fairness of the subsequent legal processes.
Read More
President Biden issued preemptive pardons to three siblings, two spouses, and several other individuals, including Dr. Fauci and Gen. Milley, citing concerns about politically motivated investigations. These pardons, announced shortly before President-elect Trump’s inauguration, aimed to protect those targeted from the damaging effects of baseless probes, regardless of guilt or innocence. The president stated that such investigations can cause irreparable harm to reputations and finances. This action, while breaking with historical norms, follows precedent of outgoing presidents granting eleventh-hour pardons, including family members.
Read More
President Biden’s decision to pardon family members in the final moments of his presidency has ignited a firestorm of debate. The act itself, a seemingly last-minute flurry of executive clemency, raises profound questions about the power of the presidency and the state of the nation’s justice system. The sheer fact that such a move was even contemplated, let alone executed, suggests a deep-seated distrust in the fairness and impartiality of the incoming administration.
The timing, so close to the end of his term, adds a layer of intrigue and criticism. Many see it as a desperate attempt to shield his family from potential future prosecutions, a preemptive strike against what many perceive as a politically motivated witch hunt.… Continue reading
President Biden issued preemptive pardons for five family members—his brother James, James’s wife Sara, his sister Valerie, Valerie’s husband John, and his brother Francis—citing baseless, politically motivated investigations targeting them. These pardons, announced shortly before the presidential transition, accompanied similar pardons for other figures, including Dr. Fauci and Gen. Milley. The president emphasized that the pardons do not indicate guilt and that the investigations caused irreparable damage. This action follows Biden’s earlier pardon of his son, Hunter, after Hunter’s conviction on federal gun and tax charges.
Read More
Biden preemptively pardons Anthony Fauci, Mark Milley, and Jan. 6 committee members, a move that has sparked considerable debate. This unprecedented action is directly aimed at shielding these individuals from potential politically motivated prosecutions under a future Trump administration. The rationale behind the pardons rests on the belief that these individuals would face intense scrutiny, harassment, and even criminal charges simply for performing their duties.
Biden preemptively pardons these individuals due to the perceived threat of a post-election “witch hunt.” The fear is not merely of investigations but of a deliberate campaign to intimidate and punish those who served in the previous administration, a fear amplified by Trump’s past rhetoric and actions.… Continue reading
In his final hours in office, President Biden issued preemptive pardons to Dr. Anthony Fauci, General Mark Milley, and members of the January 6th Committee, citing fears of potential retribution from the incoming Trump administration. This unprecedented action, spurred by Trump’s threats and selection of partisan cabinet nominees, protects individuals who have been targeted for their roles in investigating the former president. While Biden insisted the pardons don’t imply guilt, the move represents a broad, untested use of presidential power and sets a precedent for future administrations. The pardons aim to safeguard these individuals from politically motivated prosecutions, acknowledging the potential for irreparable damage to their reputations and finances.
Read More
President Biden’s recent pardon of nearly 2,500 nonviolent drug offenders is a significant action, prompting a wide range of reactions. The pardons specifically target individuals who received lengthy sentences based on outdated distinctions between crack and powder cocaine, as well as those penalized under obsolete sentencing enhancements for drug-related crimes. This move is seen by many as a step towards addressing historical injustices within the criminal justice system.
The timing of these pardons has sparked debate. Some argue the action should have been taken much sooner, potentially on day one of his presidency, instead of waiting until later in his term.… Continue reading
Vice President-elect JD Vance supports pardons for non-violent January 6th protesters who he believes have been unfairly prosecuted. However, he opposes pardons for those who committed violence that day, differing from President-elect Trump’s stated intention to pardon all his supporters involved in the riot, regardless of the severity of their actions. Vance acknowledged a gray area regarding violent acts, emphasizing a commitment to equal justice while also suggesting a case-by-case review for those potentially provoked into violence. Trump, meanwhile, has repeatedly expressed his intention to issue “major pardons” for Jan. 6 rioters.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood