Biden Impeachment

South Korean President Apologizes for Failed Martial Law Attempt Amid Impeachment Threat

Facing intense pressure, including from within his own party, President Yoon Suk Yeol apologized for his attempt to impose martial law but refused to resign. His actions, which were rescinded hours after their declaration following parliamentary defiance, prompted calls for his impeachment. Despite some within his party advocating for his resignation, Yoon stated he would accept responsibility and leave the political situation’s resolution to his party. Investigations into insurrection and abuse of power are underway, with potential severe penalties for those involved.

Read More

South Korean President Apologizes for Attempted Martial Law

Following a failed attempt to impose martial law, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol issued a public apology, acknowledging the significant shock and disruption caused to the nation. He attributed his actions to desperation and accepted responsibility, stating he would not evade legal or political consequences. Facing an imminent impeachment vote and calls for his resignation from within his own party, Yoon declared there would be no further attempts to invoke martial law. The president’s actions, deemed reckless and undemocratic, have triggered widespread condemnation and a political crisis.

Read More

South Korea’s President Faces Impeachment After Failed Martial Law Coup

South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law for approximately six hours due to his frustration with the opposition-controlled parliament, citing a need to combat perceived “anti-state” forces. The declaration, swiftly met with widespread condemnation, was lifted after a parliamentary vote rejecting the measure. The opposition party immediately called for Yoon’s resignation or impeachment, while the US expressed serious concerns over the situation. This unprecedented action, the first since 1987, has deepened the political crisis within South Korea.

Read More

South Korean Opposition Parties Push for Yoon Suk Yeol’s Immediate Impeachment

The unexpected and short-lived declaration of martial law in South Korea led to widespread disruption of entertainment schedules. Netflix cancelled actress Seo Hyun-jin’s promotional interview for “The Trunk” as a direct result. The announcement cited the martial law situation as the reason for the cancellation. While the martial law was lifted quickly, rescheduling of the interview is currently pending. Further updates regarding a new interview date will be provided by Netflix.

Read More

South Korean President’s Martial Law Attempt Fails After Parliament Vote

South Korean President Yoon’s announcement to lift martial law following a parliamentary vote marks a swift and dramatic end to an attempted power grab that stunned the nation and the world. The move, initially met with disbelief and fear, ultimately showcased the resilience of South Korea’s democratic institutions and the unified resistance against an apparent attempt at authoritarian rule.

The speed with which the situation unfolded is remarkable. The declaration of martial law itself seemed to catch many off guard, leading to widespread confusion and anxiety, particularly given the historical context of past martial law periods and their associated human rights abuses.… Continue reading

South Korean Parliament Overrules Martial Law Declaration

Following President Yoon Suk Yeol’s declaration of martial law, South Korea’s National Assembly voted overwhelmingly to lift the decree, with all 190 present members supporting the motion. The Assembly chair declared the martial law declaration invalid, urging citizens to remain calm. Thousands protested outside the parliament building, demanding the president’s impeachment, while international actors like the US and UK expressed concern and monitored the situation closely. The Korean won also experienced a sharp decline against the US dollar.

Read More

Smith Drops Jan. 6 Charges Against Trump: Outrage Erupts

Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss all federal charges against President-elect Donald Trump concerning classified document mishandling and election interference. These dismissals stem from the Department of Justice’s longstanding policy prohibiting the indictment of a sitting president, a policy invoked previously during Trump’s first term and now applicable due to his re-election. While the government maintained the merits of its cases, the policy’s application necessitated the dismissal. This decision, following Supreme Court rulings bolstering presidential immunity, marks a significant moment, leaving the pursuit of accountability for these alleged actions to Congress via impeachment.

Read More

Trump’s New York Sentencing Unlikely Despite Conviction

The fate of Donald Trump’s conviction on 34 felony counts in New York will be determined next week, with a judge deciding whether to grant his request to dismiss the case. If the judge upholds the conviction, Trump will face sentencing later this month, a move that would be unprecedented in American history. While the judge is unlikely to sentence Trump to jail time due to his status as a sitting president, his legal team is expected to seek delays and appeals. This case, unlike federal charges against Trump, remains a significant legal hurdle due to the unique complexities of sentencing a sitting president and the lack of presidential pardon power in state cases.

Read More

Jack Smith Pauses Jan. 6 Case as Trump Wins Election, Sparking Outrage

Jack Smith’s decision to pause the January 6th case after Trump’s election has sparked outrage and disappointment among many. It feels like a surrender to the corrupt system that allows wealthy and powerful individuals to escape consequences for their actions. The anger and frustration are palpable, with many feeling like the justice system is rigged against the common person.

People are questioning why it took four years to bring this to trial, highlighting the glacial pace of justice in this situation. The perception is that the Department of Justice has been cowardly and inactive, failing to hold Trump accountable for his actions.… Continue reading

McConnell backed Jack Smith, wanted Trump to “pay” for Jan. 6

McConnell backed Jack Smith and wanted Trump to “pay” for the events of January 6th. That’s what the headlines read, that’s what people are talking about. But let’s take a step back and really look at McConnell’s actions and the impact they have had on our country.

You know what would have really allowed Trump to pay? Convicting him during the two impeachment trials. That was McConnell’s chance to send a clear message that inciting an insurrection will not be tolerated. But what did he do? He chose to acquit. He had the power to hold Trump accountable, to make sure he “paid” for his role in January 6th, but he failed to act.… Continue reading