Approval of US leadership among NATO members has plummeted to its lowest point during President Biden’s term, according to a recent Gallup poll. The median approval rating in 2024 dipped to a mere 35 percent, a significant decrease from the 40 percent recorded in 2023, and even further down from the 41 percent seen in 2021. This sharp decline underscores a growing concern among NATO allies regarding the direction of US foreign policy.
The contrast with the previous administration is stark. While President Biden’s approval ratings, although low, still significantly outperform those of his predecessor. During Trump’s final year, approval among NATO members bottomed out at a dismal 18 percent, with a staggering 72 percent disapproval.… Continue reading
President-elect Trump announced plans to rename the Gulf of Mexico the “Gulf of America,” citing the U.S.’s significant presence in the region. This announcement, made during a press conference, also included renewed threats of tariffs against Mexico and Canada, alongside unsubstantiated claims about drug trafficking. Further, Trump hinted at potential military action to reclaim the Panama Canal and acquire Greenland, indicating a broader agenda of assertive foreign policy. These pronouncements follow previous statements regarding exorbitant Canal fees and a purportedly pro-Trump sentiment within Greenland.
Read More
Trump’s suggestion to retake the Panama Canal if transit fees aren’t lowered is a dramatic escalation, raising eyebrows internationally. The statement itself is startling, given the implications of unilaterally seizing another nation’s sovereign territory. It suggests an approach to international relations that prioritizes aggressive unilateral action over diplomacy and negotiation.
This action, if implemented, would be a clear violation of international law and norms, potentially triggering significant diplomatic backlash and jeopardizing US relations with numerous countries. Beyond the legal ramifications, such a move could severely damage America’s standing in the global community, undermining its credibility and leadership.
The claim seemingly stems from a dispute over transit fees, implying a belief that the US has some inherent right to influence or control these prices.… Continue reading
Iran’s recent setbacks have reportedly left its leadership “dumbfounded,” a situation stemming from the unexpected effectiveness of Israeli strikes against their proxy forces. The significant investment poured into these proxies appears to have yielded minimal returns, leaving Iran feeling the sting of wasted resources and strategic miscalculations.
This situation highlights a fundamental flaw in Iran’s approach to regional power projection. Instead of focusing on internal development—improving public education, modernizing infrastructure, and fostering economic growth— substantial funds have been diverted towards supporting and arming groups that destabilize the region. This strategy, ultimately, has backfired spectacularly.
The Israeli strikes, in essence, exposed the vulnerability of Iran’s proxy network.… Continue reading
President-elect Trump’s recent ambassadorial nominations have sparked controversy due to the nominees’ perceived lack of qualifications and potential conflicts of interest. The selections, including Herschel Walker for the Bahamas, Charles Kushner for Paris, and Kimberly Guilfoyle for Greece, have been criticized as prioritizing political loyalty over diplomatic expertise. This unprecedented volume of nominations, many lacking relevant experience, has led experts to express concerns about the potential damage to US foreign policy and international relations. The speed and nature of these appointments raise questions about the vetting process and the future direction of American diplomacy.
Read More
A letter signed by nearly 100 former U.S. officials strongly opposes President-elect Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence, citing concerns about her judgment and fitness for the role. The letter highlights Gabbard’s meetings with dictators such as Assad and Putin, including a 2017 trip to Syria and support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. These actions, the officials argue, raise serious questions about her suitability for the position. The letter urges Senate leaders to conduct closed-door briefings before confirming her nomination.
Read More
Three former aides revealed Tulsi Gabbard, Donald Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence, regularly consumed Kremlin-controlled RT propaganda, despite warnings about its unreliability. This aligns with Gabbard’s evolving foreign policy views, which have shifted from supporting military aid to Ukraine in 2014 to blaming NATO and the US for Russian aggression in recent years. Critics, including some Democratic lawmakers, have questioned her loyalty to the United States due to this apparent shift and her consumption of Russian propaganda. Gabbard denies these allegations, while her transition team attributes her views to her military experience.
Read More
Germany’s Chancellor Olaf Scholz recently pledged a substantial €650 million ($685 million) military aid package to Ukraine, a decision that has sparked considerable debate both within Germany and internationally. This significant commitment comes at a time when Germany itself is facing internal political and economic challenges, raising questions about the timing and implications of such a large-scale aid package.
The aid package itself represents a considerable investment in supporting Ukraine’s ongoing conflict with Russia. It’s a concrete demonstration of Germany’s commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, a commitment that has evolved significantly since the beginning of the war. The specifics of what this package entails – the types of weaponry, the logistical support, and the training involved – will undoubtedly be closely scrutinized in the coming weeks and months.… Continue reading
Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade warns that if Donald Trump’s classified documents case is dropped and he returns to the presidency, key American allies may cease sharing sensitive intelligence. This stems from concerns that Trump’s past handling of classified information, much of it originating from foreign governments, demonstrates a lack of trustworthiness. The potential loss of this crucial intelligence sharing would severely compromise national security. Co-hosts of the #SistersInLaw podcast concur, emphasizing the international ramifications of a potential Trump second term and the impact on foreign intelligence cooperation.
Read More
Ocasio-Cortez’s assertion that Gabbard’s nomination is a globally pro-war nomination stems from a belief that Gabbard’s stances, particularly regarding Russia’s actions, actively undermine international norms and stability. The argument isn’t that Gabbard herself is actively advocating for widespread conflict, but rather that her rhetoric and alliances inadvertently support actions that destabilize global security and embolden aggressors.
This perspective emphasizes the potential consequences of Gabbard’s viewpoints on the international stage. The concern isn’t solely about American interests, but about the broader impact on global peace and the legitimacy of internationally recognized principles. The argument suggests that accepting Gabbard’s positions implicitly validates Russia’s behavior and could lead to further escalation of conflicts worldwide.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker