A New Hampshire federal judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking President Trump’s executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship for children of undocumented or temporarily residing immigrants. The order, targeting a clause within the 14th Amendment, would have denied citizenship documents to these newborns starting February 19th. The judge ruled that the plaintiffs, including community support organizations, would likely suffer irreparable harm if the order proceeded, citing established legal precedent affirming birthright citizenship, such as the Wong Kim Ark Supreme Court case. This injunction follows similar rulings in Washington and Maryland, and the legal battle over the constitutionality of the executive order continues.
Read More
President Trump announced on Truth Social his directive to halt the production of new pennies, citing the minting cost exceeding the coin’s value. This decision aligns with the administration’s broader cost-cutting agenda, aiming to eliminate wasteful government spending. The President claims the cost of producing each penny is over two cents. The order was issued to the Treasury Secretary, effectively ending the minting of new one-cent coins.
Read More
Judge Coughenour granted a preliminary injunction against former President Trump’s executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship, finding the order unconstitutional. The judge’s decision, which blocks enforcement of the order ahead of its February 18th effective date, strongly affirmed the rule of law and rejected the administration’s attempt to amend the Constitution via executive action. He declared that altering birthright citizenship requires a constitutional amendment, not an executive order. This ruling comes from a Reagan-appointed judge, underscoring the bipartisan nature of the legal challenge to the executive order.
Read More
Following arguments from 18 state attorneys general and several cities, a federal judge in Boston is considering a request to block President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship. Plaintiffs contend the order violates the 14th Amendment and would cost states significant funding for essential services. The judge’s decision is pending, but two other federal judges have already issued nationwide injunctions against the order. The core legal dispute centers on the 14th Amendment’s definition of citizenship and the executive branch’s authority to alter it.
Read More
Elon Musk’s purported Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) embedding itself within the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) represents a deeply unsettling development. The sheer audacity of this action, seemingly authorized by an executive order exceeding Congressional authority, is alarming. The lack of substantial pushback is even more concerning, painting a picture of a system failing to uphold its own checks and balances. The characterization of this move as a “metastasizing cancer” feels tragically apt.
This isn’t just corporate overreach; it’s a blatant disregard for democratic processes. The creation of a position seemingly holding more power than Congress itself via executive order is fundamentally wrong.… Continue reading
The White House is reportedly preparing an executive order that will result in the dismissal of thousands of federal health workers. This action has sparked widespread outrage and concern, raising significant questions about its potential consequences for public health and national well-being. The sheer scale of the proposed cuts is alarming, particularly given the already strained state of the nation’s healthcare system. This drastic reduction in the federal health workforce could leave a significant gap in critical services, potentially weakening our ability to respond to future health crises.
This move seems counterintuitive, especially considering the recent challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and the current surge in other infectious diseases like avian flu.… Continue reading
The White House plans an executive order to eliminate the Department of Education, fulfilling a long-standing campaign promise by President Trump. While Congress’s approval is needed for such an action, the order reflects a broader Republican agenda to return education control to states. Opponents, such as the National Education Association, warn of negative consequences for students, particularly vulnerable populations. Despite Republican control of Congress, passing legislation to abolish the department faces significant hurdles, requiring bipartisan support.
Read More
President Trump’s numerous actions, including a federal spending freeze, a ban on birthright citizenship, and the dismissal of multiple inspectors general, have prompted accusations from legal scholars and historians of widespread violations of constitutional and federal law. These actions, characterized as a “blitzkrieg on the law,” involved circumventing established procedures and disregarding the authority of other branches of government. The unprecedented speed and scope of these actions have raised concerns about the erosion of the rule of law and the normalization of such behavior. Legal challenges to these executive orders have resulted in temporary injunctions, highlighting the significant legal and constitutional questions they raise.
Read More
The State Department has halted the issuance of U.S. passports with “X” gender markers, suspending all applications to update gender markers on existing passports. This action, mandated by a presidential executive order, affects transgender and nonbinary individuals, causing confusion and jeopardizing travel plans. The policy change, which reflects a move to only recognize male and female sex assigned at birth, leaves many without crucial identification documents and potentially exposes them to increased risks. This reversal of previous policy creates significant hardship and uncertainty for the affected community, highlighting a significant setback in LGBTQ+ rights.
Read More
Upon returning to the White House, President Trump initiated a widespread purge of perceived enemies within the federal government. High-profile figures and anonymous civil servants alike have faced firing, reassignment, or other forms of retribution, leaving many “shell-shocked.” This revenge campaign targets those who investigated Trump, opposed his policies, or publicly criticized him, including the dismissal of numerous inspectors general and the targeting of career officials at the Department of Justice. The administration’s actions, including an executive order labeled a “roadmap for retribution,” signal a continued and potentially escalating campaign of vengeance.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood