Rep. Dave Min introduces a bill, the BAD DOGE Act, aiming to repeal President Trump’s executive order establishing DOGE. This bold move seeks to dismantle what the representative and his cosponsors see as an unconstitutional power grab, asserting that Elon Musk’s involvement in DOGE violates fundamental principles of governance.
The bill’s introduction is framed as a necessary response to what is described as a blatant disregard for the separation of powers, federal labor laws, and Congressional authority. The argument presented is that DOGE’s actions are undermining essential government functions, leading to job losses and the misappropriation of funds without proper Congressional oversight.… Continue reading
Judge Lauren King issued a preliminary injunction against President Trump’s executive order banning federal funding for gender-affirming care for transgender minors in Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, and Colorado. The injunction, halting the order just before a temporary pause expired, followed a lawsuit filed by doctors arguing the executive order unconstitutionally infringed on states’ rights and violated the separation of powers. The judge’s ruling emphasized upholding constitutional checks and balances, while the Trump administration maintains the order protects children. Legal challenges are expected to continue, potentially reaching the Supreme Court.
Read More
Trump to sign executive order declaring English the official language of the United States. The news of this potential executive order has sparked a wide range of reactions, from amused bewilderment to outright outrage. Some find the entire endeavor a performative act designed to appeal to a specific segment of the population, questioning its practical impact on pressing issues like inflation, job growth, or the stock market.
The proposed order’s implications extend beyond symbolic gestures. Concerns have been raised about its potential to disenfranchise non-native English speakers, particularly regarding voting access and the provision of government services. The possibility of limiting voting instructions to English only, for instance, raises serious questions about equal access to the democratic process.… Continue reading
A federal judge has indefinitely blocked a Trump administration plan to freeze federal aid, issuing a preliminary injunction against the executive order. The judge found the plan to be unconstitutional, citing its impracticality and breadth. The order aimed to pause trillions of dollars in spending virtually overnight, or alternatively, required an impossible feat of reviewing every grant, loan, and fund for compliance within a single day. This massive undertaking was deemed both legally unsound and extraordinarily impractical.
The judge’s decision highlights the inherent flaw in the plan’s design. The sheer scale of the proposed freeze—affecting potentially trillions of dollars—made its swift implementation impossible.… Continue reading
A federal judge partially blocked President Trump’s executive order aiming to eliminate government diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, deeming the order’s claims of illegality unfounded. The order, alleging DEI initiatives violate civil rights laws, sought to halt related awards and contracts. A coalition of academic institutions successfully challenged the order, arguing the resulting uncertainty harmed educators, students, and communities reliant on federal funding. Judge Adam B. Abelson’s ruling prevents the administration from terminating DEI-related obligations, emphasizing the decades-long legality of such programs. This decision provides relief to plaintiffs facing potential funding disruptions.
Read More
Following a stop-work order issued Tuesday, the Trump administration reversed course Friday, rescinding the order and allowing the Acacia Center for Justice to resume providing legal services to nearly 26,000 unaccompanied migrant children. The initial order halted funding for all activities under the center’s federal contract, jeopardizing legal representation for vulnerable children navigating the immigration system. This reversal ensures the continuation of vital legal aid, preventing a potential “cataclysmic collapse” of nonprofit legal services for immigrant children. The Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of the Interior have not yet commented publicly.
Read More
Representative Balderson voiced concerns regarding President Trump’s executive orders, emphasizing Congress’s crucial role in decisions impacting agencies like the Department of Education. He also discussed the uneven impact of electric vehicle tax credits, arguing that rural communities with limited infrastructure may not benefit. While acknowledging the need for fiscal responsibility regarding programs like Medicare and Medicaid, Balderson assured that eliminating them wasn’t being considered, although potential changes and cuts remain under discussion. He proposed innovative solutions like mobile health units to improve healthcare access, particularly in rural areas.
Read More
President Trump signed an executive order granting the president and attorney general sole authority to interpret the law for the executive branch, effectively overriding the independence of numerous federal agencies. This action, supported by figures like OMB Director Russell Vought, reflects the “unitary executive theory,” consolidating presidential power. The order targets agencies like the FTC and SEC, diminishing their autonomy granted by Congress and designed to protect against political influence. This power grab is part of a broader effort to reshape the American government through executive action and mass firings.
Read More
Early in his presidency, Donald Trump issued numerous executive orders, many facing legal challenges, prompting a Pew Research Center survey on public opinion regarding expanded presidential power. A significant majority (65%) deemed granting Trump more power “too risky,” while only 33% believed it would improve problem-solving. This skepticism extended to presidential power in general, with 78% expressing concern about its expansion. Partisan divides were evident, with Republicans more likely than Democrats to favor increased presidential authority for Trump.
Read More
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order compelling government agencies to reinstate public access to health-related websites and data removed following President Trump’s executive order mandating the use of “sex” instead of “gender.” This order, prompted by a lawsuit from Doctors for America, addresses the removal of crucial resources, including HIV prevention reports and CDC reproductive health guidance, impacting patient care and medical research. The judge found the government’s actions caused irreparable harm to both doctors and the public by hindering access to vital health information. The government argued that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate harm, a claim the judge rejected.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker