Biden executive orders

Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order: A Likely Supreme Court Showdown

President Trump’s executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship is unconstitutional, directly contradicting the 14th Amendment and established Supreme Court precedent, most notably *United States v. Wong Kim Ark*. The order’s immediate legal challenges have a high likelihood of success, despite the current Supreme Court’s conservative leaning. Even the justices in *Plessy v. Ferguson*, known for its racist ruling, upheld birthright citizenship in *Wong Kim Ark*, demonstrating the strength of the 14th Amendment’s clear language. The continued assertion of birthright citizenship reaffirms the nation’s commitment to legal equality for all born within its borders.

Read More

LA Mayor Issues Emergency Housing Order Amid Wildfire Crisis

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has issued a crucial executive order in response to the devastating wildfires and the ensuing housing crisis. The order focuses on expediting the approval process for nearly 1,400 nearly-completed housing units, aiming to provide much-needed temporary shelter for displaced residents. This swift action recognizes the urgent need for housing solutions amidst the ongoing emergency.

The executive order also establishes two critical task forces. The Debris Removal Task Force will develop comprehensive plans to address the massive cleanup operation following the fires. This is a vital step in the recovery process, ensuring the safety and well-being of those affected.… Continue reading

Biden Permanently Bans Offshore Drilling, Defying Trump Reversal

President Biden issued an executive order permanently banning future offshore oil and gas leasing across 625 million acres of US ocean waters, citing environmental concerns and arguing the ban is unnecessary to meet national energy needs. This action, invoking the 1953 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, is designed to be difficult for a future administration to reverse, requiring congressional action. While the oil industry and some Republicans strongly opposed the move, the administration maintains the ban will have little economic impact and enjoys bipartisan support from coastal communities and governors. The decision builds on prior presidential actions to protect coastal areas from offshore drilling.

Read More

Biden’s DOJ Succession Order: Procedural Move or Political Gambit?

This executive order establishes a new order of succession for the Attorney General’s office, outlining four U.S. Attorneys who will temporarily assume the role if the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, Associate Attorney General, and any designated officers are unable to perform their duties. The order explicitly excludes acting U.S. Attorneys and those ineligible under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act. President Biden retains the discretion to deviate from this order as permitted by law. Finally, this order revokes Executive Order 13787 of March 31, 2017.

Read More

Trump’s Threat to Birthright Citizenship: Can He Legally Revoke It?

Despite repeated attempts by former President Trump to eliminate birthright citizenship via executive order, this is constitutionally impossible. The 14th Amendment explicitly grants citizenship to all persons born in the U.S. and subject to its jurisdiction, a principle affirmed repeatedly by the Supreme Court. Attempts to overturn this would require a constitutional amendment, not executive action. This right applies equally to children of all parents, regardless of immigration status, reflecting a foundational aspect of American equality.

Read More

Trump Plans Swift Purge of Trans Troops Post-Inauguration

Upon assuming office, Donald Trump is expected to issue an executive order removing transgender service members from the military, reversing President Biden’s policy. This action would affect approximately 15,000 transgender individuals currently serving, exacerbating existing recruitment shortfalls and potentially costing billions of dollars in retraining and lost experience. The order is part of a broader agenda targeting LGBTQ+ rights, including restrictions on healthcare and sports participation for transgender youth. Experts warn this policy will harm military readiness and unit cohesion.

Read More

Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Threat: Can He Ignore the 14th Amendment?

President-elect Trump aims to end birthright citizenship via executive order, mandating at least one US citizen parent for automatic citizenship and denying benefits to children of two undocumented parents. Legal experts overwhelmingly believe this action would violate the 14th Amendment and the precedent set by *United States v. Wong Kim Ark*, rendering it likely unsuccessful in court. The proposed order could affect millions of children in mixed-status families, disproportionately impacting those of Mexican and Central American descent. Ending birthright citizenship would require a constitutional amendment, a politically improbable feat.

Read More

Trump’s Executive Order Sparks Fears of Military Purge

The proposed executive order, which mirrors a 1940 system intended for officer development, would expedite the removal of military officials deemed lacking in leadership qualities. While the order leaves the definition of these qualities vague, it raises concerns about potential abuse for political purposes. Critics warn that such a system could be used to purge dissenting voices and create a military leadership solely loyal to the administration’s agenda, potentially undermining the integrity and independence of the armed forces. The order’s implementation remains uncertain, but its potential to politicize the military has sparked widespread debate and alarm.

Read More

Trump Plans to Purge Generals with Loyalty Board, Raising Concerns of Military Coup

A draft executive order circulated by Donald Trump proposes the creation of a board tasked with removing military generals and admirals deemed lacking in “requisite leadership qualities.” This proposal has sparked significant concerns and raised alarm bells across the political spectrum.

The primary concern is that this board, rather than focusing on genuine leadership qualities, would be used to purge the military of individuals who do not exhibit unwavering loyalty to Trump. Such a move would effectively undermine the integrity of the military, turning it into a tool for the president’s personal agenda rather than a protector of the Constitution.

Critics argue that this purge would be akin to the actions of dictatorships, where the military is stripped of its independence and forced to serve the whims of the ruling party.… Continue reading