Newsmax host Rob Finnerty lauded Donald Trump’s swift implementation of numerous executive orders upon his return to the White House, characterizing him as a “dictator” elected by the American people. These orders included efforts to overturn birthright citizenship, deny transgender rights, expand the death penalty, and pardon January 6th rioters. Finnerty celebrated this “shock and awe” approach, suggesting it overwhelmed the mainstream media’s ability to provide thorough coverage. He attributed the public’s support to their having “asked for and voted for” these actions.
Read More
Trump’s early actions, a flurry of executive orders, strikingly align with the proposals outlined in Project 2025, a conservative policy blueprint he previously dismissed. A significant number of his initial executive actions directly mirror, or partially overlap with, the recommendations detailed in this plan. This congruence between Trump’s actions and Project 2025’s proposals raises serious questions about the extent of his involvement and understanding of the policies he enacted.
The sheer number of overlapping initiatives is undeniable. Dozens of Trump’s executive orders find parallels within Project 2025’s extensive framework. This isn’t mere coincidence; it suggests a deliberate, perhaps even orchestrated, implementation of a pre-determined agenda.… Continue reading
Trump’s recent executive order mandating the declassification of files related to the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy has sparked considerable discussion. The order directs relevant officials to develop and present plans for full release; a 15-day deadline for JFK materials and a 45-day deadline for the MLK and RFK files. This timeframe difference is intriguing and prompts questions about the varying complexities of the cases or perhaps the sheer volume of documents involved.
The order, however, doesn’t guarantee immediate public access. The plans themselves, due within the specified timeframes, will outline the steps necessary for release.… Continue reading
A federal judge in Seattle swiftly blocked President Trump’s attempt to curtail birthright citizenship through an executive order, deeming the action blatantly unconstitutional. This decisive move came after a hearing where the judge, a Reagan appointee, expressed profound disbelief at the Justice Department’s defense of the order.
The judge’s temporary restraining order halts the implementation of the executive order, preventing the denial of citizenship to thousands of newborns annually. The order’s impact would have been significant, affecting an estimated 150,000 children yearly, according to the states challenging the order in court.
The legal challenge, one of several filed against the executive order, proceeded rapidly, leading to the swift judicial intervention.… Continue reading
Trump’s executive order dismantling DEI initiatives falsely claims such policies undermine traditional American values, a claim directly contradicted by his own actions and appointments. The order, penned by someone other than Trump himself, ironically champions “merit” while simultaneously promoting unqualified, predominantly white men to positions of power. This pattern is further exemplified by Trump’s past actions, including the dismissal of qualified women and minorities, and his preference for individuals who align with his ideology over those with demonstrable expertise. Ultimately, the order and related actions reveal a prioritization of partisan loyalty and identity over competence and merit.
Read More
President Trump’s first day back in office saw him sign numerous executive orders, a significant portion of which directly mirrored proposals from the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025. This policy blueprint, previously distanced from by Trump, includes actions such as withdrawing from international agreements and boosting domestic oil production. The implementation of Project 2025 highlights the influence of conservative think tanks and their corporate backing in shaping the administration’s agenda. With Republican control of Congress, this conservative agenda will likely be swiftly enacted.
Read More
President Trump issued an executive order granting six-month interim security clearances to incoming White House officials facing vetting delays, a move national security lawyers deem unusual. This action, attributed to a backlog partly caused by Trump’s delayed transition process, bypasses standard security protocols, including polygraph tests. Concerns exist that this could compromise intelligence sharing with foreign partners due to the lack of vetting. The backlog stemmed from Trump’s team delaying the necessary agreements with the FBI, a delay consistent with his broader distrust of the national security establishment.
Read More
Executive Order language declaring fetal personhood from conception contradicts established biological understanding of fetal development, as genitalia differentiation begins only around six to seven weeks gestation. This legal categorization of a fetus as a person has significant implications, including restricting abortion access and potentially criminalizing pregnant individuals. Furthermore, the concept of fetal personhood has been used to limit access to IVF and birth control. The Texas GOP’s recent attempt to codify this ideology highlights its broad potential impact beyond abortion rights.
Read More
President Trump’s administration issued a memo mandating the paid leave and potential termination of all federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) staff. This follows executive orders dismantling federal DEI programs and reversing affirmative action in federal contracting, effectively using the same tools previously employed to promote DEI to now eliminate it. Agencies are required to remove all DEI-related webpages and training materials, compile a list of DEI staff, and develop plans for their removal. This aggressive campaign aims to upend DEI efforts nationwide, extending to investigations of private companies’ DEI initiatives.
Read More
Donald Trump’s presidency begins with a blatant attack on the LGBTQ+ community, marking a dramatic shift towards discriminatory policies. His administration’s focus on defining sex solely based on biological sex at conception is a thinly veiled attempt to erase transgender and non-binary identities. This approach not only ignores the complexities of gender identity, but also fundamentally disregards the lived experiences and rights of a significant portion of the population.
The impact of this executive order extends far beyond simple definitions. It directly threatens access to healthcare, employment opportunities, and even basic legal protections for LGBTQ+ individuals. The implications for transgender individuals serving in the military, for example, are immediately apparent, creating a hostile and discriminatory environment.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood