Biden executive orders

Trump Executive Order Sunsets Environmental Regulations: National Emergency Declared

This executive order mandates a “zero-based regulating” approach to energy production regulations, aiming to stimulate innovation and economic growth. Specific agencies are directed to incorporate sunset provisions into existing and new regulations, requiring periodic review and potential rescission by a certain date unless extended. This process will subject regulations to public comment on costs and benefits, ensuring their continued relevance. The order excludes regulatory permitting regimes and clarifies that regulatory expirations will not count towards existing deregulation requirements.

Read More

Trump’s Racist Order: Confederate Statues Return

This executive order mandates a review of all Department of the Interior properties to identify monuments, memorials, etc., removed or altered since January 1, 2020. The review will specifically address whether such removals or changes perpetuate a false narrative of American history, downplay significant events or figures, or reflect partisan bias. A key implication is the potential reinstatement of Confederate statues, many of which were removed following 2020 BLM protests. Furthermore, the order singles out the African American history museum for allegedly promoting harmful ideologies.

Read More

Trump Threatens to Ban Union Representation for 700,000 Federal Workers

Late Thursday, President Trump issued an executive order eliminating collective bargaining rights for approximately 700,000 federal union workers across numerous departments, citing national security concerns and claiming union opposition to his agenda. This action, utilizing a loophole in the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act, represents the most significant attack on federal worker unions in US history. Major unions, including the AFGE and AFSCME, have denounced the order as illegal and vowed immediate legal action. The White House justified the move by alleging that certain federal unions have engaged in actions against the administration.

Read More

Trump’s Order to Purge Museums Sparks Outrage: Echoes of Nazi Book Burning

President Trump signed an executive order, “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” aiming to counter what it terms a biased rewriting of American history. The order specifically targets the Smithsonian Institution, prohibiting funding for exhibits deemed divisive or inconsistent with federal policy, and mandates a review of monuments altered since 2020. Further, the order seeks to prevent the disparagement of Americans in historical displays. This action follows Trump’s recent takeover of the Kennedy Center, resulting in numerous high-profile cancellations.

Read More

Trump’s Voter ID Order: State’s Rights Clash and Potential for Voter Suppression

Trump signs an executive order mandating proof of U.S. citizenship to vote. This action immediately sparks a firestorm of debate, raising questions about its legality, its practicality, and its potential impact on the upcoming elections. Many immediately point out that the Constitution assigns the power to regulate elections to the states, not the federal government. This executive order seems to directly contradict this established principle of states’ rights, a point often emphasized by those who support the order’s intended goals.

The practicality of the order is also heavily questioned. Many wonder how such a requirement would be enforced, especially considering the diverse documentation Americans possess, and the variations in how states manage voter registration and verification processes.… Continue reading

Trump Faces Multiple Legal Setbacks

On Tuesday, President Trump faced multiple legal setbacks. A federal judge blocked his ban on transgender service members, citing a violation of constitutional rights. Another judge ruled the dismantling of USAID likely unconstitutional, ordering the reinstatement of employee access. Further, other rulings prevented the administration from terminating climate grants and education funding, deeming the actions arbitrary and irrational. These decisions represent significant legal challenges to Trump’s executive orders.

Read More

Federal Contract Silence on Segregation Sparks Outrage

A recent change to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) removes the explicit prohibition of segregated facilities in federal contracts. This alteration, prompted by President Trump’s executive orders on diversity and gender identity, rescinds a clause dating back to the 1960s that mandated integrated workplaces for federal contractors. While existing state and federal laws against segregation remain in effect, legal experts deem this change symbolically significant, potentially undermining decades of progress toward racial and gender equality. The removal of the clause occurred without the typical public comment period, raising concerns about transparency and due process.

Read More

Trump Reverses Biden’s $17.75 Federal Contractor Minimum Wage

President Trump rescinded President Biden’s executive order mandating a $17.75 minimum wage for federal contractors, reverting to a pre-2022 standard of $13.30 for existing contracts and the federal minimum wage ($7.25) or applicable state minimums for new ones. This action overturned a significant pay increase impacting roughly 20% of the U.S. workforce employed by federal contractors. The repeal also eliminated Biden’s pro-union and apprenticeship program incentives for federal contracts. This decision follows court rulings upholding Biden’s order, raising the possibility of future executive action by Trump to address other policy priorities.

Read More

Trump’s Assault on Free Speech: A Threat to Democracy

President Trump’s administration is waging a broad assault on free speech, targeting various sectors with executive orders designed to enforce conformity to its viewpoints. This campaign utilizes threats of funding cuts, retaliation, and even deportation, as exemplified by the case of Mahmoud Khalil, a green card holder deported for pro-Palestinian activism. The actions chill free expression, prompting self-censorship among organizations fearful of losing funding, and represent a significant escalation of attacks on First Amendment rights. Legal challenges are mounting against these executive orders, which critics argue are unconstitutionally vague and constitute viewpoint discrimination.

Read More