Shopping Trends operates independently from CTV News journalists. The team’s recommendations may result in commission earnings through affiliated shopping links. Transparency regarding this financial relationship is maintained for readers. Further details about the team and its operations are available via a provided link.
A new poll reveals that 58% of Americans oppose President Trump’s tariffs, with a majority (53%) wanting Congress to intervene. Bipartisan support exists for a bill granting Congress a two-month review period for new tariffs, though its passage remains uncertain due to potential filibusters and a threatened presidential veto. Legal challenges are also underway, arguing that the President’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to justify tariffs is unlawful. The poll further indicates widespread public disapproval of Trump’s broader economic policies, with majorities believing they are increasing grocery prices and harming the stock market.
A new Morning Consult poll reveals that, for the first time since May 2021, Americans trust Democrats more than Republicans to handle the economy. This shift follows President Trump’s implementation of controversial tariffs, which have increased prices and fueled market instability. The poll shows a decline in Trump’s approval rating and reveals a disconnect between public priorities (like lowering costs and improving healthcare affordability) and the President’s perceived actions. These findings coincide with growing criticism from both Republicans and Democrats regarding the economic consequences of the administration’s policies.
On Fox News Sunday, Governor JB Pritzker criticized President Trump’s tariffs, calling them “taxes on working families” and arguing they harm American consumers and farmers. He advocated for targeted tariffs instead of the broad approach taken by the Trump administration, emphasizing the need for policies that lower costs and expand markets. Pritzker also countered arguments that the tariffs boost domestic production, asserting that any potential benefits would be long-term and overshadowed by immediate job losses and economic recession. He further condemned the use of tariffs to punish allies and disrupt existing trade agreements.
Facing immense economic and political backlash following his announcement of sweeping new tariffs, President Trump temporarily suspended the measures for 90 days. This dramatic reversal damaged America’s international standing and his own reputation, prompting concern among Republicans and business leaders. The move came after significant market volatility and widespread condemnation of the tariffs, which were criticized for their flawed methodology and potential to harm the US economy. While the White House attempted to spin the pause as a strategic maneuver, analysts viewed it as a sign of vulnerability and a capitulation to mounting pressure. The conflict with China, however, remains unresolved, leaving the future economic outlook uncertain.
This article is protected by copyright © 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, including a notice regarding the sale or sharing of personal information. FORTUNE is a registered trademark, and the site may contain affiliate links. Finally, all offers are subject to change.
Bessent responded to concerns about a potential recession by arguing that the manufacturing sector was already in a downturn under the previous administration. His administration’s plan, termed “reprivatization,” involves deficit reduction, federal workforce streamlining, and bank deregulation to stimulate private sector growth. Lower interest rates, inflation, and energy prices are anticipated as a result of these policies. This approach aims to create an environment where the private sector can overcome the economic slowdown.
The US’s recent decision to exclude smartphones, computers, and other electronics from reciprocal tariffs is a fascinating development, prompting a flurry of reactions ranging from relief to outright derision. The initial imposition of these tariffs, intended to leverage economic pressure, has clearly backfired, at least in this specific area. The administration’s retreat on this front suggests a significant vulnerability within the US economy’s ability to produce these essential items domestically, forcing a reconsideration of the broader trade strategy.
This exemption highlights a stark reality: the US isn’t currently equipped to manufacture the volume of smartphones and computers consumed domestically, even with increased protectionist measures in place.… Continue reading
The suppression of two pool reports—one detailing the exclusion of AP photographers from a Trump dinner, the other citing the cancellation of a joint press conference—highlights the Trump administration’s efforts to control press coverage. This censorship follows a February ban on the Associated Press from the White House press pool, later overturned by a judge. The administration’s actions underscore its attempts to restrict journalist access and manipulate information dissemination. The White House press pool’s crucial role in national news distribution is directly undermined by these actions. This pattern of censorship represents a significant challenge to press freedom.
This article details allegations of insider trading linked to fluctuating economic policies, specifically citing President Trump’s use of tariffs. The practice, described as a “poop and scoop” strategy, involves deliberately depressing stock prices before strategically buying, profiting from subsequent price increases. Concerns have been raised by Senator Adam Schiff and others regarding potential White House complicity and the use of platforms like Truth Social to facilitate this activity. Investigations are warranted to determine if any individuals profited unjustly from this alleged insider trading.
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood