Federal Judge Paula Xinis sharply criticized the Trump administration for its handling of Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s deportation, accusing them of ignoring court orders and obstructing justice. The administration defiantly claimed that even if returned, Abrego Garcia would be immediately re-deported due to alleged MS-13 ties, despite accusations of misinterpreting court orders to “facilitate” his return. Judge Xinis rejected the administration’s arguments, ordering two weeks of intensive discovery and emphasizing the urgency of Abrego Garcia’s situation, highlighting the daily harm to him and his family. The judge’s rebuke follows the Supreme Court’s upholding of her previous order mandating the administration facilitate Abrego Garcia’s release from a Salvadoran prison. The administration’s actions have been met with outrage from Abrego Garcia’s wife and widespread protest.
Read More
Aditya Harsono, a 33-year-old Marshall resident with a pending green card application, was arrested by ICE and faces deportation despite possessing a valid student visa. His arrest followed the revocation of his F-1 visa, seemingly linked to a dismissed charge from a 2021 protest. Harsono’s attorney believes the detention is politically motivated, citing the prioritization of the protest charge over a past misdemeanor. He remains in custody despite a granted bond appeal, leaving his wife and infant daughter facing separation.
Read More
Despite a Supreme Court ruling and a court order barring his deportation, Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia remains imprisoned in El Salvador. Senator Chris Van Hollen plans to travel to El Salvador to demand his release, with several other Democratic representatives indicating their intention to join him. The Trump administration claims it cannot compel El Salvador’s president to release Abrego Garcia, despite a Supreme Court order, and the White House continues to falsely label him a terrorist. This action follows a unanimous Supreme Court decision requiring the administration to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return to the United States.
Read More
The Trump administration has emailed hundreds of thousands of immigrants, falsely claiming their permission to remain in the U.S. has been revoked and demanding immediate departure. These mass emails, originating from the Department of Homeland Security, erroneously targeted some U.S. citizens and caused widespread confusion among recipients whose immigration statuses vary. While some parolees may indeed face deportation, others may still qualify for alternative immigration relief, highlighting the inappropriateness of the blanket email approach. Customs and Border Protection acknowledges potential misdirection and plans to address individual cases.
Read More
Federal Judge Paula Xinis sharply criticized the Trump administration for its inaction in returning Kilmar Ábrego García, a Salvadoran national wrongly deported to El Salvador, giving officials two weeks to provide evidence of their efforts. The judge threatened contempt of court charges if the administration fails to demonstrate good faith, demanding sworn testimony from four Homeland Security officials. While the Supreme Court ordered the administration to facilitate Mr. Ábrego García’s return, the government’s actions, including conflicting statements about his potential re-entry, raise concerns about compliance. The case highlights a broader conflict between the judicial and executive branches regarding deportation policy and the Trump administration’s handling of the situation.
Read More
President Trump’s proposal to deport American criminals to the notoriously harsh Salvadoran prison, CECOT, has sparked legal controversy. Attorney General Bondi declined to comment on the legality of the plan, despite legal experts deeming it clearly illegal. This follows the administration’s refusal to repatriate Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a legally protected American mistakenly deported to CECOT, despite a Supreme Court order. The plan also raises concerns regarding the legality of deporting Venezuelans to CECOT, given human rights abuses and the questionable invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. The administration, however, maintains the plan enhances national security.
Read More
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller’s statement that those who “preach hate for America” will face deportation sparked widespread criticism. Miller made the remark while defending the deportation of a Salvadoran gang member and a Hamas-supporting protester, Mahmoud Khalil. This declaration ignited concerns that the administration is undermining First Amendment protections of free speech and dissent. The controversy highlights escalating tensions surrounding immigration enforcement and the potential for suppressing political opposition.
Read More
President Bukele refused President Trump’s request to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the U.S., citing the absurdity of facilitating the man’s re-entry after his deportation, which the Justice Department admits was erroneous. Despite a Supreme Court order deeming the deportation illegal and directing the administration to facilitate Garcia’s return, administration officials, including Stephen Miller, contradicted the Justice Department’s acknowledgment of error, claiming the deportation was justified. This disagreement stems from conflicting views on Garcia’s alleged MS-13 affiliation and the extent of judicial authority over foreign policy.
Read More
Early American colonists vehemently opposed Britain’s practice of transporting convicts to the colonies and the subsequent trial of colonial defendants in England. This opposition is reflected in the Declaration of Independence’s grievances and likely influenced the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, including exile. James Madison strongly condemned deportation, even of non-citizens, highlighting the cruelty inherent in such banishment, particularly when considering the loss of property and connections. Given Madison’s views, the prospect of a U.S. government exiling its own citizens would likely have been seen as exceptionally egregious.
Read More
Photojournalist Philip Holsinger documented the arrival of Venezuelan migrants deported from the U.S. to El Salvador’s notorious CECOT prison. Despite many lacking criminal records, they were subjected to a brutal intake process involving forceful handling, hair shaving, and a stripping of their identity, culminating in a dehumanizing display of forced submission. This occurred amidst El Salvador’s controversial crackdown on gangs, resulting in a massive prison population increase and human rights concerns. Holsinger’s photographs capture the migrants’ despair and highlight the questionable circumstances of their imprisonment. The jarring contrast between the migrants’ perceived innocence and their harsh treatment underscores the larger issues of human rights violations and due process within El Salvador’s intensified security measures.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker