Special counsel Jack Smith’s request to pause the criminal case against former President Donald Trump in order to assess an “unprecedented circumstance” has sparked a firestorm of reactions. The move, while seemingly intended to ensure a fair and thorough investigation, has been met with a mix of outrage, resignation, and even a touch of morbid humor.
Many critics see Smith’s request as a sign of weakness, a capitulation to Trump’s penchant for manipulating the legal system to his advantage. They argue that the case should proceed without delay, that any pause only emboldens Trump and his allies. They point to the numerous allegations against Trump, including his alleged involvement in the January 6th Capitol riot and his handling of classified documents, as evidence that a swift resolution is necessary.… Continue reading
With President-elect Trump’s victory, the two federal cases against him are likely to be dismissed or delayed due to a longstanding Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Special counsel Jack Smith is taking steps to conclude both cases before Trump takes office. The cases include charges related to election interference in Washington, D.C., and the alleged mishandling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, Florida. While the latter case presents a more complex situation due to the involvement of other defendants and the potential impact on future special counsel appointments, the Justice Department may choose to abandon the appeal.
Read More
As I delve into the ongoing saga of Special counsel Jack Smith’s appeal regarding the ruling that tossed Trump’s classified documents case, I am astounded by the intricate web of corruption and manipulation that seems to encompass this entire situation. The revelation of Trump’s blatant admission to possessing classified documents that were not declassified, alongside the evident delays and biased judgments made by Judge Cannon, paints a grim picture of a justice system that may be easily swayed by political influence.
The audacity of Trump’s actions, combined with the apparent judicial malpractice exhibited by Judge Cannon, creates a sense of urgency for justice to prevail in this case.… Continue reading
As I read about the latest news regarding former President Trump’s plan to sue the Department of Justice for $100 million over the Mar-a-Lago raid after the classified documents case was dismissed, I cannot help but feel a sense of frustration and disbelief. The fact that he is willing to pursue such a lawsuit, especially considering the circumstances surrounding the case, reflects a level of audacity that is truly astounding.
The case itself was dismissed due to the biased judgment of Judge Cannon, who claimed that Attorney Jack Smith was “illegally appointed by the Justice Department.” However, this dismissal does not absolve Trump of any wrongdoing or justify his decision to pursue legal action against the DOJ.… Continue reading
It is truly disheartening to see the recent decision by Judge Aileen Cannon to dismiss the classified documents indictment against former President Donald Trump. This ruling, handed down on Monday, raises significant concerns about the integrity of our judicial system. In her 93-page order, Cannon argued that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution, a claim that seems to be a thinly veiled attempt to shield Trump from facing accountability for his actions.
The fact that this case was dismissed on such flimsy grounds is deeply troubling. It is clear that Cannon’s decision was politically motivated, rather than based on legal merit.… Continue reading
A federal judge recently dismissed the indictment against former President Trump involving the mishandling of classified documents. The judge argued that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution, citing concerns over the role of Congress in such appointments. This decision has sparked outrage and disbelief among many Americans, including myself. It raises questions about the integrity and fairness of our judicial system, particularly when it comes to high-profile and politically sensitive cases.
The ruling by Judge Cannon, who was a Trump appointee, has been scrutinized for its timing and potential political motivations. Some have speculated that this decision was a deliberate move to benefit Trump and give him a boost during the Republican National Convention.… Continue reading
I can’t help but feel a sense of frustration and disillusionment upon hearing the news that Judge Cannon has dismissed the classified documents case against Trump. It’s disheartening to see the judicial system, a supposed pillar of democracy, being compromised and manipulated for political gains. The fact that Judge Cannon, who was appointed by Trump himself, made this ruling goes to show how deep the roots of corruption have grown within our government institutions.
This ruling not only dismisses a crucial legal threat against Trump but also sets a dangerous precedent for the future. It is a blatant display of favoritism and bias, with the judge seemingly putting her loyalty to Trump above the rule of law.… Continue reading
The recent news about Trump’s concern over returning classified documents after a subpoena raises serious questions about his integrity and the potential criminality of his actions. It’s alarming to think that a former president would be hesitant to comply with the law when it comes to handling sensitive information. The fact that Trump was caught refusing to return the documents in question is troubling enough, but his apparent fear of facing criminal charges only adds another layer of suspicion to the situation.
One can’t help but wonder what kind of information Trump was in possession of that would lead him to believe that returning it could result in legal trouble.… Continue reading
Judge Aileen Cannon is at the forefront of determining the fate of a collection of sealed notes that could unravel the depths of Donald Trump’s alleged criminal activities. The contents of these notes could practically prove Trump’s involvement in stealing and withholding classified documents from the U.S. government – a severe breach of trust and national security. The mere notion that someone who held the highest office in the land could be implicated in such illicit activities is chilling.
The fact that these notes exist and hold potentially damning evidence against Trump raises a myriad of questions. Why would a former President, entrusted with safeguarding national secrets, go to such lengths to retain sensitive information after leaving office?… Continue reading
I can’t wrap my head around the audacity and blatant disregard for the law shown by Donald Trump. The fact that he went to Mar-a-Lago to check on ‘boxes’ before an FBI raid is beyond comprehension. It’s clear that he was trying to cover his tracks, save his own skin, and potentially sell off classified information for personal gain. The level of betrayal and treachery is staggering.
What astounds me even more is the apparent protection that Trump seems to be receiving from Judge Aileen Cannon. A Trump loyalist presiding over his felony case is a direct conflict of interest and further erodes any semblance of justice and fairness in our legal system.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker