Special Counsel Jack Smith concluded his investigations into Donald Trump, submitting his reports to Attorney General Merrick Garland and subsequently resigning from the Department of Justice. These investigations involved Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election and his mishandling of classified documents. Following Smith’s resignation, the Justice Department is contesting Trump’s efforts to keep the reports sealed. Despite Judge Cannon dismissing the Mar-a-Lago case, the case against Trump’s co-defendants continues. Trump, throughout the process, repeatedly attacked Smith personally and vowed to fire him if re-elected.
Read More
Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade warns that if Donald Trump’s classified documents case is dropped and he returns to the presidency, key American allies may cease sharing sensitive intelligence. This stems from concerns that Trump’s past handling of classified information, much of it originating from foreign governments, demonstrates a lack of trustworthiness. The potential loss of this crucial intelligence sharing would severely compromise national security. Co-hosts of the #SistersInLaw podcast concur, emphasizing the international ramifications of a potential Trump second term and the impact on foreign intelligence cooperation.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith is concluding his investigations into Donald Trump, facing a tight deadline before Trump’s potential inauguration. Two cases are involved: one concerning Trump’s actions related to the January 6th insurrection and another regarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Smith must submit a final report to Attorney General Garland, who will then decide on public release, though Trump’s potential retribution looms large. The reports’ contents, including classified information and grand jury materials, will be closely watched, especially considering Trump’s threats and the uncertain future of the investigations.
Read More
Jack Teixeira, a former Air National Guard member, was sentenced to 15 years in prison for illegally sharing classified documents from the Pentagon on a social media platform. Teixeira pleaded guilty to six counts of espionage-related charges, acknowledging his actions in transmitting sensitive information about matters like military aid to Ukraine and threats against U.S. forces abroad. He was arrested in April 2023 and had been in custody since mid-May. Despite possessing a top-secret security clearance and receiving training on handling classified information, Teixeira began sharing documents online in January 2023, ultimately leading to his arrest and conviction.
Read More
Donald Trump’s two federal criminal cases, stemming from his attempt to overturn the 2020 election and his possession of classified documents, are set to be dropped due to the long-standing precedent that a sitting president cannot be prosecuted for federal crimes. While this decision may protect the Department of Justice as an institution, it will likely be used by Trump to claim that the charges against him were politically motivated, further weaponizing the justice system against it. To counter this, Special Counsel Jack Smith should memorialize the cases in writing, including all evidence and testimony, forcing Trump’s team to publicly end them and exposing their actions. This will allow the public to see the full extent of Trump’s alleged criminal behavior and hold him accountable for his actions.
Read More
Special counsel Jack Smith’s request to pause the criminal case against former President Donald Trump in order to assess an “unprecedented circumstance” has sparked a firestorm of reactions. The move, while seemingly intended to ensure a fair and thorough investigation, has been met with a mix of outrage, resignation, and even a touch of morbid humor.
Many critics see Smith’s request as a sign of weakness, a capitulation to Trump’s penchant for manipulating the legal system to his advantage. They argue that the case should proceed without delay, that any pause only emboldens Trump and his allies. They point to the numerous allegations against Trump, including his alleged involvement in the January 6th Capitol riot and his handling of classified documents, as evidence that a swift resolution is necessary.… Continue reading
With President-elect Trump’s victory, the two federal cases against him are likely to be dismissed or delayed due to a longstanding Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Special counsel Jack Smith is taking steps to conclude both cases before Trump takes office. The cases include charges related to election interference in Washington, D.C., and the alleged mishandling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, Florida. While the latter case presents a more complex situation due to the involvement of other defendants and the potential impact on future special counsel appointments, the Justice Department may choose to abandon the appeal.
Read More
As I delve into the ongoing saga of Special counsel Jack Smith’s appeal regarding the ruling that tossed Trump’s classified documents case, I am astounded by the intricate web of corruption and manipulation that seems to encompass this entire situation. The revelation of Trump’s blatant admission to possessing classified documents that were not declassified, alongside the evident delays and biased judgments made by Judge Cannon, paints a grim picture of a justice system that may be easily swayed by political influence.
The audacity of Trump’s actions, combined with the apparent judicial malpractice exhibited by Judge Cannon, creates a sense of urgency for justice to prevail in this case.… Continue reading
As I read about the latest news regarding former President Trump’s plan to sue the Department of Justice for $100 million over the Mar-a-Lago raid after the classified documents case was dismissed, I cannot help but feel a sense of frustration and disbelief. The fact that he is willing to pursue such a lawsuit, especially considering the circumstances surrounding the case, reflects a level of audacity that is truly astounding.
The case itself was dismissed due to the biased judgment of Judge Cannon, who claimed that Attorney Jack Smith was “illegally appointed by the Justice Department.” However, this dismissal does not absolve Trump of any wrongdoing or justify his decision to pursue legal action against the DOJ.… Continue reading
It is truly disheartening to see the recent decision by Judge Aileen Cannon to dismiss the classified documents indictment against former President Donald Trump. This ruling, handed down on Monday, raises significant concerns about the integrity of our judicial system. In her 93-page order, Cannon argued that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution, a claim that seems to be a thinly veiled attempt to shield Trump from facing accountability for his actions.
The fact that this case was dismissed on such flimsy grounds is deeply troubling. It is clear that Cannon’s decision was politically motivated, rather than based on legal merit.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood