This Giving Tuesday, support the *Washington Monthly*’s mission to promote well-conceived policy ideas amidst a surge of misinformation. Unlike many publications, the *Washington Monthly* prioritizes policy analysis, offering crucial insights into building a better America. In contrast to previous administrations, the Biden administration boasts a remarkable record of ethical conduct, with zero indictments or convictions of any political appointees. This stands in sharp contrast to previous administrations, which faced numerous indictments, convictions, and resignations due to ethical breaches. Support the *Washington Monthly* financially to continue this vital work.
Read More
Biden’s recent move to eliminate subminimum wages for individuals with disabilities marks a significant step toward achieving wage equality. This decision, a fulfillment of a campaign promise, is poised to spark considerable debate and legal challenges. The Department of Labor’s year-long review of the Depression-era program culminated in a proposed rule that would halt the issuance of certificates allowing subminimum wages and initiate a three-year phaseout for existing certificates.
This proposed rule will be subject to a public comment period, extending until January 17, 2025. This timeframe places the final decision in the hands of the incoming administration, leaving the future of the rule uncertain and contingent on their response to public commentary and potential legal challenges.… Continue reading
President Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, citing politically motivated charges and selective prosecution. This action drew swift condemnation from Republicans, who accused the president of hypocrisy and avoiding accountability. Simultaneously, the president-elect, Trump, is reportedly installing loyalists into key positions, including nominating Charles Kushner as Ambassador to France and potentially replacing FBI Director Wray with Kash Patel. These appointments, along with the pardon, demonstrate a pattern of prioritizing personal loyalty and retribution over democratic norms and institutional integrity. The overall narrative highlights a deeply partisan environment characterized by mutual animosity and disregard for established procedures.
Read More
President Biden’s pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, for federal gun and tax charges, issued days before sentencing, sparked immediate outrage among Congressional Republicans. Many Republicans, including House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, accused Biden of lying about his intentions and using his power for familial gain, citing the pardon as an admission of guilt. Criticism also came from some Democrats, who expressed concern over the precedent set by the pardon. The pardon encompassed offenses committed between 2014 and 2024, encompassing those prosecuted by Special Counsel David C. Weiss. The decision contradicts Biden’s previous public statements against pardoning his son.
Read More
President Biden pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, for federal gun and tax charges, prompting immediate outrage from Republican lawmakers. Republicans criticized the pardon as a politically motivated move to avoid accountability, citing perceived hypocrisy given past criticisms of the Justice Department. Some Democrats also expressed disapproval, arguing the pardon set a dangerous precedent. Biden defended his decision, asserting Hunter was unfairly targeted due to his familial connection.
Read More
President Biden’s annual Thanksgiving turkey pardon highlights the underutilization of his broader clemency powers. Over 65 members of Congress urged Biden to employ these powers to address systemic injustices within the criminal justice system, specifically citing mass incarceration and the disproportionate impact on marginalized communities. This call for action emphasizes the potential for pardons to correct inequities and reduce the substantial financial burden of mass incarceration. Advocates argue for a more expansive use of clemency, referencing the historical precedent of presidents granting pardons to thousands, and highlighting the urgent need for action on death row cases.
Read More
Intelligence assessments consistently indicate that providing Ukraine with longer-range U.S. weapons, such as the ATACMS, does not significantly increase the risk of a Russian nuclear attack, despite Kremlin rhetoric to the contrary. This conclusion informed the Biden administration’s decision to authorize their use, a move intended to bolster Ukraine’s negotiating position. However, Russia is anticipated to intensify sabotage efforts against European infrastructure, and a potential Trump presidency poses a considerable threat to continued U.S. support for Ukraine. The ongoing war also presents challenges for Ukraine including battlefield losses and potential foreign troop deployments.
Read More
Biden’s recent announcement of a $725 million arms aid package for Ukraine highlights a complex situation with significant domestic and international implications. This isn’t just a simple transfer of funds; it’s a multifaceted issue involving the replenishment of US military stockpiles, support for a crucial ally in a major conflict, and the ongoing debate over domestic spending priorities.
The fact that Congress approved this package underscores the bipartisan consensus on supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression. This isn’t a rogue action by the President; it’s a deliberate policy decision reflecting a perceived national interest in containing Russian expansionism and upholding democratic principles.… Continue reading
Despite Congressional authorization of billions, the Biden administration will likely not fully utilize the $6.8 billion allocated for arming Ukraine before the end of its term due to limitations in US weapons stockpiles and production capacity. While efforts are underway to increase monthly aid packages to approximately $1 billion, this accelerated pace still leaves significant funds unused. This shortfall comes despite a concerted effort to replenish supplies and a pledge to provide Ukraine with necessary capabilities. The incoming Trump administration will then decide the future of military aid to Ukraine.
Read More
This $725 million military aid package, slated for delivery before President Biden leaves office, will bolster Ukraine’s defenses against Russia. The aid includes advanced weaponry from U.S. stockpiles, such as anti-tank weapons, drones, and HIMARS ammunition. This significant contribution aims to sustain Ukraine’s ongoing fight and mitigate Russia’s military superiority. Congressional notification is expected soon, though final details may be subject to change. The package represents a final push by the Biden administration to support Ukraine.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood