A Wall Street Journal analysis reveals a significant increase in government spending. The analysis of Treasury Department data shows outlays $154 billion higher in the current period compared to the same timeframe in 2024 under the Biden administration. This substantial rise occurred since the current administration’s inauguration in January. The findings highlight a considerable shift in fiscal policy.
The House voted to overturn a Biden administration rule limiting bank overdraft fees to $5, a move the Senate previously approved. Republicans argued the rule, projected to save consumers billions annually, would harm access to credit and force banks to eliminate overdraft protection. Democrats countered that the rule targeted exploitative fees impacting vulnerable consumers. The resolution now heads to the President for signature, effectively dismantling the regulation intended to curb excessive bank charges.
Over 900,000 migrants, granted temporary U.S. residency via the CBP One app since January 2023, have been ordered to leave immediately. These individuals, granted parole under a Biden administration initiative, were given two-year stays and work authorization. The Department of Homeland Security cited border security and national security concerns for the decision, urging voluntary self-deportation through the rebranded CBP Home app. The incoming Trump administration plans to impose daily fines of up to $998 on those who fail to depart, marking a significant shift in immigration policy.
The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision temporarily blocking the Biden administration’s freeze on millions in federal grants for teacher shortages, representing the administration’s first high court victory since January. The court reasoned that the states possessed sufficient funds to maintain their programs while litigation continued, allowing recovery of wrongfully withheld funds later. However, the decision was narrow, with dissenting justices highlighting the significant harm caused to states and questioning the court’s handling of a temporary restraining order. The ruling could have broader implications for future challenges to Trump administration policies. The case centers around allegations that grant recipients engaged in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, prompting the administration to freeze the funds.
A proposed U.S.-Ukraine deal to exchange military aid for access to Ukrainian critical minerals, particularly rare earths, proved to be a flawed proposition. Experts revealed that economically viable rare earth deposits in Ukraine are nonexistent, even ignoring the ongoing conflict. The deal’s failure highlights the Trump administration’s potentially misguided approach to securing critical minerals, characterized by strained relationships with allies and a focus on territorial expansion rather than existing domestic or allied resources. This contrasts sharply with the Biden administration’s strategy of collaborating with allied nations to develop domestic rare earth processing capabilities. The underlying reasons for the administration’s actions remain unclear.
Former CIA Director John Ratcliffe defended his use of the Signal messaging app for discussing an impending Yemen military strike, blaming the Biden administration for permitting its prior use, a claim the White House denied. Ratcliffe testified he was unaware of classified details being shared in the group chat, which included several top Trump administration officials and, inadvertently, a journalist. The chat, concerning a military operation, violated intelligence community advisories against using Signal due to security vulnerabilities. Several officials refused to clarify whether they used personal or government phones for the communication.
Readers are encouraged to submit tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is streamlined for ease of use. All tips are reviewed confidentially. Contributions can help shape future reporting. Please use this opportunity to share your information.
Larry Kudlow, a Trump ally, predicts economic hardship for Americans, citing high prices and low job growth. He blames the Biden administration, attributing high costs to factors such as bird flu and new tariffs imposed during the Trump administration. These tariffs, along with cost-cutting measures within the federal government, are projected to further exacerbate the economic downturn. However, Kudlow insists these negative economic trends are unrelated to Trump’s policies, despite evidence suggesting otherwise, such as the immediate stock market decline following the announcement of new tariffs.
The Biden press secretary’s comment, “What we’re looking at is state TV,” regarding Trump’s actions against the Associated Press and the press pool, paints a stark picture. It suggests a deliberate attempt to control information flow, mirroring tactics employed by authoritarian regimes. The statement itself highlights a deeply concerning trend, implying a systematic erosion of journalistic independence.
This characterization isn’t simply hyperbole; it points to a pattern of behavior that erodes the foundation of a free press. Actions taken against established news organizations, particularly those known for their critical reporting, raise serious questions about the administration’s commitment to transparency and accountability.… Continue reading
Republican opposition to the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), citing burdensome requirements for small businesses, resulted in a federal court halting its beneficial ownership rule enforcement. The CTA, enacted by the Biden administration to combat tax evasion and cronyism, directly clashes with the Trump administration’s approach to deregulation. This aligns with Trump’s broader efforts to weaken financial regulations and agencies overseeing corporate power, as evidenced by his recent executive order freezing enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Consequently, reduced scrutiny now facilitates potentially unethical business practices and obscures financial dealings.
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood