Senator Bernie Sanders asserts that the U.S. is rapidly becoming an oligarchy, dominated by a small number of billionaires wielding immense wealth and political influence. This concentration of power is exemplified by the nearly $2 billion spent by 150 billionaire families in the 2024 election to elect favored candidates, and subsequently, the appointment of billionaires with a combined wealth exceeding the GDP of 172 nations to the Trump administration. This trend, echoed by Senator Chris Murphy, signifies a system where the wealthy leverage government access for personal enrichment at the expense of ordinary citizens. The proposed Department of Government Efficiency, headed by billionaires with vested interests in federal funding, further exemplifies this concerning trajectory.
Read More
Following President-elect Trump’s threat to jail members of the January 6th Committee, Senator Bernie Sanders called the statement “outrageous” and suggested President Biden consider preemptive pardons for the committee members. Sanders described Trump’s actions as characteristic of authoritarianism and dictatorship. This follows Trump’s declaration of intent to pardon his supporters convicted for their involvement in the January 6th Capitol attack. However, not all Republicans support Trump’s position, with Senator Lindsey Graham explicitly disagreeing.
Read More
Senator Bernie Sanders is launching a campaign targeting America’s wealthiest individuals, like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, for their role in a global oligarchy. This oligarchy, Sanders argues, manipulates the economy, influences elections, avoids taxes, and controls the government, hindering democracy and exacerbating global inequalities. He plans a series of discussions exposing this influence and the incoming administration’s ties to the billionaire class. Sanders contends that this oligarchic system undermines crucial issues like climate change and healthcare, ultimately prioritizing the wealthy elite over the common good. He asserts that addressing this oligarchy is paramount to restoring democratic principles and improving societal well-being.
Read More
The recent murder is unequivocally condemned; however, the resulting online anger highlights the deeply flawed and cruel American healthcare system. This system leads to preventable deaths (60,000 annually) and significant life expectancy disparities based on socioeconomic status. Fundamental change requires a political movement prioritizing healthcare as a human right, achievable through eliminating waste and administrative bloat within the current system, not necessarily increasing overall spending. This would allow quality care for all citizens, mirroring systems in other developed nations.
Read More
Senator Sanders opposes the nearly $850 billion National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2025, citing the excessive military spending while many Americans face economic hardship. He highlights the potential for “disastrous misplaced power” within the military-industrial complex, echoing Eisenhower’s warnings. Sanders points to rampant fraud, waste, and cost overruns within the defense industry, citing examples of major contractors’ overcharging and fines. The NDAA’s passage remains uncertain, though opposition is expected less due to the budget size and more because of controversial provisions targeting transgender healthcare for minors.
Read More
Despite their differing political views, Senator Bernie Sanders and Elon Musk surprisingly find common ground on Pentagon spending and prescription drug prices. Both have criticized the Pentagon’s repeated audit failures and billions in unaccounted spending, advocating for greater fiscal responsibility. Furthermore, they share a commitment to lowering the exorbitant costs of medications like Ozempic and Wegovy, citing the ethical implications of price gouging. This unexpected alignment highlights a potential area for bipartisan cooperation, though their broader political differences remain.
Read More
Senator Bernie Sanders attributes President-elect Trump’s victory to a deeply entrenched oligarchy, characterized by extreme wealth inequality and corporate control over media and politics. He highlights the disproportionate influence of billionaire families in elections and the resulting power imbalance favoring the wealthy few over the working class. Sanders calls for a direct confrontation with this oligarchy, emphasizing the need to build a powerful working-class movement to create a more equitable economic and political system. This requires addressing critical issues such as campaign finance reform, expanding grassroots organizing, and recruiting candidates committed to working-class interests.
Read More
Following the 2024 election, Senator Sanders clarified that he is not currently advocating for a new political party, despite recent speculation. However, he emphasized the need for more working-class candidates and suggested that running as an Independent, outside the Democratic primary, might be strategically advantageous in certain situations. Sanders highlighted Dan Osborn’s successful independent campaign as a model, illustrating the potential for candidates who challenge both established parties and resonate with working-class voters. He believes a stronger working-class movement is crucial for achieving meaningful political change.
Read More
Following the 2024 election, Senator Sanders argued that the Democratic Party’s focus on the status quo contributed to their losses, unlike the Republicans’ campaign emphasizing change. He questions whether the Democratic leadership will learn from this defeat and support working-class interests. Sanders highlights the success of independent candidate Dan Osborn, who significantly outperformed the Democratic ticket in Nebraska by running an anti-establishment, pro-union campaign. This, Sanders suggests, demonstrates the potential for independent working-class candidates to challenge both major parties and resonate with voters.
Read More
Despite facing strong opposition from the White House and Senate leadership, Senator Sanders’s effort to halt arms sales to Israel during the Gaza crisis failed. His resolutions, which sought to block the sale of various munitions, garnered minimal support, with not a single Republican vote and less than half of the Democratic caucus voting in favor. This vote reflects the deep partisan divide on the issue and highlights the ongoing debate surrounding U.S. military aid to Israel amidst the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza. The resolutions were ultimately defeated, demonstrating the continued strong support for Israel within the Senate, despite concerns raised by some about human rights violations and the ongoing conflict.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker