For a limited time, an annual subscription to FT Edit is available for $49, a savings of $10.88 from the original price. This provides access to eight curated articles daily, delivered both via a dedicated webpage and newsletter. Subscribers enjoy uninterrupted reading through the FT Edit page on FT.com. The offer includes two months free, making it an exceptional value.
Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cancelled over $220 million in government contracts, many of which were later reinstated by federal agencies. Despite DOGE’s website inaccurately listing these contracts as terminated, the White House attributes the discrepancies to paperwork delays. While DOGE claims significant savings, the reversals highlight the challenges of making sweeping budget cuts, impacting government services and contractors. These actions have raised concerns about the effectiveness and accuracy of DOGE’s cost-cutting initiatives.
Despite claiming $160 billion in savings, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has incurred significant costs. A nonpartisan analysis estimates $135 billion in taxpayer expenses this fiscal year due to employee leave, rehires, and productivity losses stemming from DOGE’s actions. These costs, which exclude legal fees and lost tax revenue, are projected to increase. While DOGE anticipates long-term savings, critics argue the short-term costs outweigh any potential benefits, particularly considering the substantial economic ripple effects of reduced funding in key sectors.
A purported cybersecurity breach at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) allegedly involved Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), granting them extensive access to agency systems and resulting in the export of large amounts of sensitive labor data. An IT staffer’s sworn affidavit details suspicious data spikes and login attempts from a Russian IP address, raising concerns about potential exposure to foreign adversaries and misuse by private companies. While the NLRB denies a breach, the White House acknowledged DOGE’s data access, contradicting the agency’s statement. This incident coincides with Musk’s ongoing legal battle with the NLRB, adding another layer of complexity to the situation.
A whistleblower accused the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) of exfiltrating sensitive data from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), including disabling security monitoring systems. A subsequent login attempt from a user with a Russian IP address, using a newly created DOGE email account and correct NLRB credentials, was blocked but highlights potential security vulnerabilities. The whistleblower provided forensic evidence and alleges DOGE employed tactics resembling those of foreign hackers, raising serious national security concerns. These accusations are not isolated, with multiple reports suggesting widespread data exfiltration by DOGE across various agencies. The situation is further complicated by Elon Musk’s dual roles in government and at companies under NLRB investigation.
This article is protected by copyright © 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, including a notice regarding the sale or sharing of personal information. FORTUNE is a registered trademark, and the site may contain affiliate links. Finally, all offers are subject to change.
A photograph from a Trump administration cabinet meeting shows Elon Musk with a notepad reading “Top Secret!!” Social media users mocked the billionaire for the childishly written note, highlighting the underlined words and multiple exclamation points. The meeting, the first since the announcement of new tariffs, focused on the achievements of Musk’s department, DOGE, which projects $150 billion in savings. Musk announced these savings during the meeting, while President Trump praised the cabinet’s strong relationships. The image of Musk’s note quickly went viral, generating considerable online commentary.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) is conducting an audit of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), examining its handling of data across multiple federal agencies. The audit, initiated in March, focuses on DOGE’s compliance with privacy and data protection laws, including a detailed review of system access and activity. The investigation encompasses numerous agencies, with a specific focus on “potential or actual misuse of agency systems or data.” The GAO’s findings are expected to be released publicly in a report by the end of spring.
The EPA vehemently denies allegations from anonymous sources claiming that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is using AI to monitor federal worker communications for anti-Trump or anti-Musk sentiment. While Reuters reported these claims, citing unnamed sources within the EPA, the EPA spokesperson stated that the report is categorically false. These allegations, however, underscore concerns about DOGE’s expanding power, its potential overreach into employee privacy, and its controversial role in reshaping the federal bureaucracy. Ongoing legal challenges against DOGE highlight the intense scrutiny surrounding its actions and authority.
Musk’s DOGE using AI to snoop on U.S. federal workers, sources say – that’s a pretty alarming headline, isn’t it? It paints a picture of widespread surveillance, utilizing advanced AI technology to monitor the communications of government employees. The alleged target isn’t just any communication; it’s specifically focused on identifying sentiments considered hostile towards a particular political figure and their agenda.
This isn’t your typical workplace monitoring aimed at ensuring productivity. The scale and intent here are vastly different. We’re talking about a potential chilling effect on free speech within a federal agency, a situation where employees might self-censor their thoughts and opinions for fear of repercussions.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood