Elon Musk recently distanced himself from President Trump, citing his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) as the source of unfair criticism. He feels Doge, and by extension himself, has been unfairly blamed for various issues, becoming a scapegoat for the Trump administration’s actions. This shift follows a global backlash against Tesla stemming from Doge’s involvement in federal worker layoffs. Musk’s complaints coincided with SpaceX’s Starship launch failure, further highlighting the negative press surrounding his ventures.
Read More
Elon Musk is criticizing the Trump administration’s “Big Beautiful Bill” for hindering his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cost-cutting efforts, blaming it for undermining his work and causing a public backlash against his companies. Despite initially aiming to save $2 trillion, DOGE has only identified $170 billion in savings, while the bill adds $3.8 trillion to the national deficit. Musk attributes negative public perception and decreased Tesla sales to this controversy, and plans to refocus his efforts on high-impact projects within DOGE. He acknowledges overspending on political activities and intends to scale back his involvement in the future.
Read More
Despite Elon Musk’s announced reduction in his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) involvement, his influence remains substantial. At least 46 of DOGE’s 110 personnel have direct financial or professional ties to Musk, many holding key positions and exhibiting unwavering loyalty. This deep network of connections, coupled with Musk’s extensive influence within the Trump administration, renders his purported withdrawal largely symbolic. Ultimately, Musk’s continued sway over DOGE officials, stemming from both financial dependence and fear of retaliation, ensures his policies will continue to shape government action.
Read More
Elon Musk’s claims of significant government cost savings through his DOGE initiative have been sharply challenged. Initially boasting of $2 trillion in savings, this figure was revised downward to $1 trillion, then further reduced to a much smaller, unverifiable amount. When questioned about this discrepancy, Musk defensively dismissed the interviewer’s inquiries, attributing the shortfall to limitations on the advisory group’s authority and external opposition. He also engaged in a heated exchange with Bill Gates, employing a controversial personal attack.
Read More
Following over two months of intense collaboration, President Trump and his administration have significantly reduced their public association with Elon Musk. This shift coincides with Musk’s unsuccessful and expensive involvement in a Wisconsin Supreme Court race and declining approval ratings. While Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative initially promised substantial savings, the actual amount realized is far less than projected, and his contributions have diminished. Despite this, Musk maintains a relationship with Trump, attending key events such as a recent Cabinet meeting and international trips.
Read More
For a limited time, an annual subscription to FT Edit is available for $49, a savings of $10.88 from the original price. This provides access to eight curated articles daily, delivered both via a dedicated webpage and newsletter. Subscribers enjoy uninterrupted reading through the FT Edit page on FT.com. The offer includes two months free, making it an exceptional value.
Read More
Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cancelled over $220 million in government contracts, many of which were later reinstated by federal agencies. Despite DOGE’s website inaccurately listing these contracts as terminated, the White House attributes the discrepancies to paperwork delays. While DOGE claims significant savings, the reversals highlight the challenges of making sweeping budget cuts, impacting government services and contractors. These actions have raised concerns about the effectiveness and accuracy of DOGE’s cost-cutting initiatives.
Read More
Despite claiming $160 billion in savings, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has incurred significant costs. A nonpartisan analysis estimates $135 billion in taxpayer expenses this fiscal year due to employee leave, rehires, and productivity losses stemming from DOGE’s actions. These costs, which exclude legal fees and lost tax revenue, are projected to increase. While DOGE anticipates long-term savings, critics argue the short-term costs outweigh any potential benefits, particularly considering the substantial economic ripple effects of reduced funding in key sectors.
Read More
A purported cybersecurity breach at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) allegedly involved Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), granting them extensive access to agency systems and resulting in the export of large amounts of sensitive labor data. An IT staffer’s sworn affidavit details suspicious data spikes and login attempts from a Russian IP address, raising concerns about potential exposure to foreign adversaries and misuse by private companies. While the NLRB denies a breach, the White House acknowledged DOGE’s data access, contradicting the agency’s statement. This incident coincides with Musk’s ongoing legal battle with the NLRB, adding another layer of complexity to the situation.
Read More
A whistleblower accused the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) of exfiltrating sensitive data from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), including disabling security monitoring systems. A subsequent login attempt from a user with a Russian IP address, using a newly created DOGE email account and correct NLRB credentials, was blocked but highlights potential security vulnerabilities. The whistleblower provided forensic evidence and alleges DOGE employed tactics resembling those of foreign hackers, raising serious national security concerns. These accusations are not isolated, with multiple reports suggesting widespread data exfiltration by DOGE across various agencies. The situation is further complicated by Elon Musk’s dual roles in government and at companies under NLRB investigation.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker