Trump Threatens Iran Deal Reversal Amidst Criticism
The idea of a deal being so fragile that it hinges on personal liking, with the immediate threat of military action if that personal preference isn’t met, is quite frankly, alarming. It paints a picture of international relations as a playground of whims rather than a carefully constructed arena of diplomacy and mutual understanding. The notion that the cornerstone of a potential agreement could be followed by a stark declaration like, “If I don’t like it, we’ll go back to shooting,” is not just unsettling; it fundamentally undermines the very concept of a negotiation.
It begs the question: what kind of “deal” is this, if it’s not built on any firm ground of commitment or shared principles?… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker