President Trump’s denial of signing a proclamation invoking the Alien and Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan gang members caused immediate controversy. His claim, contradicting the digital signature on the Federal Register document, prompted questions about the legality of the process and raised concerns regarding potential procedural irregularities. The White House later clarified that Trump’s statement referred to the original 1798 act, not the recent proclamation, which he did sign. The confusion highlights a discrepancy between Trump’s public statements and official documentation, particularly given his past criticism of autopen usage.
Read More
Following a report questioning the validity of President Biden’s pardons, issued before leaving office, Donald Trump declared them “VOID,” prompting former Rep. Adam Kinzinger to challenge Trump to file criminal charges. Kinzinger, a frequent Trump critic and recipient of one of the pardons, argues that Trump’s actions are a distraction and that the use of an autopen for presidential signatures is not prohibited and has historical precedent. Legal experts have confirmed that a president’s handwritten signature is not required for a pardon to be valid. Kinzinger confidently asserts that any legal challenge would be easily defeated in court.
Read More
Former President Trump declared President Biden’s pardons of January 6th Committee members invalid, citing the use of an autopen for signing the documents. This claim is baseless, as the use of an autopen for signing official documents is legally binding, per Department of Justice guidance. Trump’s assertion ignores the president’s sole authority to issue pardons, and the Constitution provides no mechanism for their reversal. Committee members have publicly dismissed Trump’s pronouncements.
Read More
Trump’s recent claim that President Biden’s pardons are “void” due to the use of an autopen is, frankly, bizarre. It’s a statement that raises more questions than it answers, and highlights the increasingly surreal nature of our current political climate. The sheer audacity of declaring another president’s official actions null and void based on the method of signing is unprecedented.
This assertion seems particularly ironic considering past claims about documents being declassified merely through mental intent. If a president can, in their mind, render something classified or unclassified, why would the use of an autopen, a technology designed to increase efficiency, suddenly invalidate a pardon?… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood