Trump suggests there won’t be a trade deal with Japan, and it’s hard not to notice the pattern emerging. First, there was a “no deal with Canada,” and now the same seems to be the fate for Japan. It’s a bit bewildering, really. You start to wonder who’s next on the list of countries apparently not worthy of a trade agreement. It’s almost becoming predictable, this string of no-deals.
The whole situation begs the question: what was it about Japan? Did they do something wrong? Were they “nasty,” as the saying goes? The constant shifts in his position make it tough to keep up.… Continue reading
The European Parliament’s decision to resume engagement with China follows the lifting of sanctions imposed on five MEPs in 2021. This resumption, however, is not without caveats, as significant concerns remain regarding China’s trade practices, including market distortions and restrictive access barriers. Despite the renewed dialogue, MEPs maintain their critical stance on China’s human rights record and industrial policies. Obstacles to a positive EU-China trade relationship persist, necessitating further discussions on these key issues.
Read More
President Trump reiterated his desire to bolster domestic auto manufacturing, threatening to increase the 25% tariff on Canadian-made cars. He cited Canada’s significant role in auto production as a reason for this potential increase, despite previously suggesting a temporary exemption. This tariff escalation, if implemented, would further strain the already tense US-Canada trade relationship, impacting auto assembly lines and potentially raising vehicle prices for US consumers. Canadian political leaders have proposed various measures to mitigate the effects of these tariffs on the Canadian auto industry.
Read More
The Shopping Trends team operates independently from CTV News journalists. This team’s recommendations may result in commission earnings through affiliate links. For further transparency regarding our operations, please refer to our “About Us” section.
Read More
The White House announced a potential 245 percent tariff on Chinese imports to the U.S., a significant escalation in the ongoing trade war. This follows President Trump’s executive order investigating national security risks related to imported critical minerals. China’s foreign ministry responded by stating that the U.S. initiated the tariff war and that China’s countermeasures are justified. The increased tariffs on Chinese goods are an exception to a temporary pause on reciprocal tariffs imposed on other countries, reflecting the Trump administration’s hardline stance on trade imbalances with China.
Read More
The US plans to impose a 21% tariff on Mexican tomatoes starting in July. This announcement has sparked considerable debate and uncertainty, particularly given the seemingly arbitrary timing and the history of fluctuating US-Mexico tomato trade relations. The idea of implementing such a tariff in July, a relatively distant date in the context of current political timelines, raises questions about the practicality and potential effectiveness of the measure.
The potential impact on consumers is a significant concern. Increased costs associated with the tariff could lead to higher prices for grocery staples like ketchup and tomato soup, directly impacting the average American household.… Continue reading
Despite President Trump’s assertions, U.S. shippers report no tariff increases on containers as of Thursday. This inconsistency adds to existing confusion surrounding the tariff implementation timeline, fueled by erratic rate changes announced via social media and executive orders. The situation highlights significant challenges for customs brokers in navigating the constantly shifting regulatory landscape. Ultimately, the administration’s inability to effectively implement its own tariffs raises serious questions about the policy’s efficacy.
Read More
Amidst escalating trade tensions, Chinese President Xi Jinping declared that a trade war yields no winners, asserting China’s resilience against unfair pressure. Following President Trump’s tariff increase to 125% on Chinese goods, Beijing retaliated with reciprocal tariffs of 125% on U.S. imports and reduced U.S. film imports. Xi’s statement underscored China’s commitment to self-reliance, while the Chinese Finance Ministry condemned the U.S. actions as damaging to the global trading system. The ongoing trade war’s impact on the global economy remains uncertain.
Read More
In response to the U.S. raising tariffs on Chinese imports to 145%, China retaliated by increasing its tariffs on U.S. goods to 125%, asserting that further tariff increases are economically nonsensical. This action marks the culmination of escalating tariff battles, with both nations signaling an end to further increases. Despite the heightened tensions and lack of immediate negotiation prospects, China’s commerce ministry maintained its openness to future talks on equal terms. However, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent characterized China’s actions as a losing strategy and criticized its trade practices.
Read More
US tariffs on Mexico and Canada remain unchanged despite a recent 90-day pause announced by the administration. A White House official has confirmed that this temporary reprieve does not affect the existing tariffs imposed on these key trading partners. This statement, however, offers little clarity amidst the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the administration’s trade policies.
The inconsistent and unpredictable nature of these tariff decisions is causing significant disruption for businesses. The constant shifting of policies makes it nearly impossible for companies to create long-term plans and maintain stable trade relationships with the US. This volatility is a serious concern, threatening to damage the US economy and its standing in the global marketplace.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker