NASA has raised the probability of asteroid 2024 YR4 impacting Earth in 2032 to 3.1%, a significant increase from earlier estimates. This 177-foot-diameter asteroid, large enough to destroy a major city, currently holds a Torino Scale rating of 3. While a direct hit remains unlikely (96.9% chance of missing Earth), the potential for localized devastation necessitates further observation. Fortunately, the James Webb Space Telescope will soon study YR4 to refine its trajectory and reduce uncertainty.
Read More
Newly discovered asteroid 2024 YR4 poses a 2.6% chance of impacting Earth in 2032, a slight increase from previous estimations. This sizable asteroid, estimated at 130-300 feet in diameter, has been assigned a Torino Scale level 3 rating due to its size and impact probability. A level 3 indicates a significant risk of localized destruction should an impact occur. Further observation by the James Webb Space Telescope aims to refine impact probability assessments.
Read More
Asteroid 2024 YR4, estimated at 131 to 295 feet wide, has a currently calculated 2% chance of impacting Earth in 2032. Astronomers are utilizing various telescopes, including the James Webb Space Telescope, to refine its trajectory and size estimations before it becomes unobservable in April. More precise data will help determine the potential impact severity, ranging from localized devastation to regional destruction depending on the asteroid’s actual size. The ongoing observations are crucial for planetary defense, as smaller asteroids, while less frequent than larger ones, can still cause significant damage.
Read More
Newly discovered asteroid 2024 YR poses a calculated 2.3% chance of impacting Earth in 2032, prompting a rise in its impact risk ranking. While initially assessed as a low-probability threat by the ESA, NASA’s Cneos now places it at a three on the Torino scale. However, scientists emphasize that these probabilities are subject to change with further observation and data collection on its trajectory and velocity. The likelihood of impact is expected to decrease significantly as more data becomes available.
Read More
A relatively small asteroid recently entered Earth’s atmosphere and burned up over Siberia. While this event caused a stir and understandably generated some alarm, the fact that it disintegrated in the atmosphere highlights the significant difference between a near miss and an actual catastrophic impact. The video footage available online clearly shows the asteroid’s fiery demise, effectively lessening the initial sense of danger. The event serves as a reminder of the constant barrage of space debris entering our atmosphere, most of which poses no real threat.
The near miss over Siberia is only part of a larger story. Another massive asteroid is scheduled to make a close pass to Earth this week.… Continue reading
Asteroid the size of two ducks impacts above Germany. As I read this headline, a wave of amusement washed over me. I couldn’t help but laugh at the absurdity of using ducks as a unit of measurement. I mean, really? Couldn’t they find something more scientifically accurate? It’s as if the scientists wanted to deliberately confuse us with their choice of words.
But then, I started to think deeper about the situation. Maybe the scientists were onto something. After all, using unconventional units of measurement does grab attention and engage the readers. It adds a playful and lighthearted aspect to what could otherwise be a mundane scientific article.… Continue reading
As an avid space enthusiast, I am always intrigued by news about asteroids and their potential impact on Earth. So when I came across the headline “Asteroid the size of 64 Canadian geese to pass Earth Tuesday – NASA,” I couldn’t help but be amused by the unusual unit of measurement used. It seems that scientists have found a way to make even the most serious of subjects, like asteroids, a little more lighthearted and relatable.
Now, I must admit that I had never thought of using Canadian geese as a unit of measurement for anything, let alone asteroids. It’s not exactly a conventional choice, but then again, who am I to question the creativity of the scientific community?… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood